新型氟化物-稀土胶合剂对正畸带固位的影响

D. Stephen Norris D.D.S. , Pamela McInnes-Ledoux B.D.S., M.Sc.(Dent.) , Bernhard Schwaninger D.D.S., Dr. Med. Dent. , Roger Weinberg Ph.D.
{"title":"新型氟化物-稀土胶合剂对正畸带固位的影响","authors":"D. Stephen Norris D.D.S. ,&nbsp;Pamela McInnes-Ledoux B.D.S., M.Sc.(Dent.) ,&nbsp;Bernhard Schwaninger D.D.S., Dr. Med. Dent. ,&nbsp;Roger Weinberg Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/0002-9416(86)90033-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prevalence of enamel decalcification beneath orthodontic bands has indicated the need for a fluoride-releasing, enamel-adhesive orthodontic luting cement. The purpose of this study was to compare the retentive bond strengths of orthodontic bands cemented with two new fluoride-releasing cements, a zinc polycarboxylate and a glass ionomer, with the retentive bond strength of bands cemented with the standard orthodontic cement zinc phosphate. The site of cement failure was also evaluated. One hundred eighty extracted human molar teeth were embedded in resin blocks and randomly assigned to three cement groups. Adapted bands were cemented by a clinically acceptable technique. The cemented teeth were then assigned to one of three time intervals-24 hours, 7 days, and 60 days-and thermocycled in synthetic saliva. The force required to initially fracture the cement bond was used as a measure of cement retention. By means of the Instron, a tensile load was applied to each cemented band. The maximum retentive strength (cement failure) was interpreted from the stress-strain curve at the point where linearity deviated. The failure site was judged subjectively: between cement and enamel, within the cement, or between cement and the band. Using stress at failure, an analysis of variance showed no significant differences among the retentive strengths of the three cements. The chi-square test revealed a significant difference (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) between failure sites of the zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cements. Significantly more bands cemented with the glass ionomer failed at the cement/band interface, leaving the cement adhered to the tooth. Both the glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate cements tested were found to be suitable as orthodontic luting agents. In addition, the favorable failure site of the glass ionomer (cement adhered to enamel) may offer clinical protection against decalcification under loose bands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75476,"journal":{"name":"American journal of orthodontics","volume":"89 3","pages":"Pages 206-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90033-3","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-re leasing cements\",\"authors\":\"D. Stephen Norris D.D.S. ,&nbsp;Pamela McInnes-Ledoux B.D.S., M.Sc.(Dent.) ,&nbsp;Bernhard Schwaninger D.D.S., Dr. Med. Dent. ,&nbsp;Roger Weinberg Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0002-9416(86)90033-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The prevalence of enamel decalcification beneath orthodontic bands has indicated the need for a fluoride-releasing, enamel-adhesive orthodontic luting cement. The purpose of this study was to compare the retentive bond strengths of orthodontic bands cemented with two new fluoride-releasing cements, a zinc polycarboxylate and a glass ionomer, with the retentive bond strength of bands cemented with the standard orthodontic cement zinc phosphate. The site of cement failure was also evaluated. One hundred eighty extracted human molar teeth were embedded in resin blocks and randomly assigned to three cement groups. Adapted bands were cemented by a clinically acceptable technique. The cemented teeth were then assigned to one of three time intervals-24 hours, 7 days, and 60 days-and thermocycled in synthetic saliva. The force required to initially fracture the cement bond was used as a measure of cement retention. By means of the Instron, a tensile load was applied to each cemented band. The maximum retentive strength (cement failure) was interpreted from the stress-strain curve at the point where linearity deviated. The failure site was judged subjectively: between cement and enamel, within the cement, or between cement and the band. Using stress at failure, an analysis of variance showed no significant differences among the retentive strengths of the three cements. The chi-square test revealed a significant difference (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) between failure sites of the zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cements. Significantly more bands cemented with the glass ionomer failed at the cement/band interface, leaving the cement adhered to the tooth. Both the glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate cements tested were found to be suitable as orthodontic luting agents. In addition, the favorable failure site of the glass ionomer (cement adhered to enamel) may offer clinical protection against decalcification under loose bands.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"89 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 206-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90033-3\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002941686900333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0002941686900333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

正畸带下牙釉质脱钙的流行表明需要一种释放氟化物的牙釉质粘接剂正畸骨水泥。本研究的目的是比较两种新型氟释放胶合剂(聚羧酸锌和玻璃离子聚合物)与标准磷酸锌正畸胶合剂粘合带的固位结合强度。并对水泥破坏部位进行了评价。180颗拔除的人类磨牙用树脂嵌套,随机分为3组。采用临床可接受的技术对适应的腕带进行骨水泥。然后将粘合的牙齿分配到三个时间间隔中的一个-24小时,7天和60天-在合成唾液中进行热循环。最初破坏水泥胶结所需的力被用作水泥保留度的度量。通过Instron,对每个胶结带施加拉伸载荷。最大保留强度(水泥破坏)由线性偏离点的应力-应变曲线解释。破坏部位主观判断:骨水泥与牙釉质之间、骨水泥内、骨水泥与牙带之间。利用破坏应力,方差分析显示三种胶结物的固位强度没有显著差异。卡方检验显示差异有统计学意义(P <0.01),磷酸锌和玻璃离子水合物的破坏位点之间存在差异。使用玻璃离聚体胶结的骨箍在骨水泥/骨箍界面失效,导致骨水泥粘附在牙齿上。玻璃离聚体和聚羧酸锌胶合剂均适合作为正畸固牙剂。此外,玻璃离聚体(粘接在牙釉质上的骨水泥)的有利失效部位可以提供临床保护,防止松动带下的脱钙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-re leasing cements

The prevalence of enamel decalcification beneath orthodontic bands has indicated the need for a fluoride-releasing, enamel-adhesive orthodontic luting cement. The purpose of this study was to compare the retentive bond strengths of orthodontic bands cemented with two new fluoride-releasing cements, a zinc polycarboxylate and a glass ionomer, with the retentive bond strength of bands cemented with the standard orthodontic cement zinc phosphate. The site of cement failure was also evaluated. One hundred eighty extracted human molar teeth were embedded in resin blocks and randomly assigned to three cement groups. Adapted bands were cemented by a clinically acceptable technique. The cemented teeth were then assigned to one of three time intervals-24 hours, 7 days, and 60 days-and thermocycled in synthetic saliva. The force required to initially fracture the cement bond was used as a measure of cement retention. By means of the Instron, a tensile load was applied to each cemented band. The maximum retentive strength (cement failure) was interpreted from the stress-strain curve at the point where linearity deviated. The failure site was judged subjectively: between cement and enamel, within the cement, or between cement and the band. Using stress at failure, an analysis of variance showed no significant differences among the retentive strengths of the three cements. The chi-square test revealed a significant difference (P < 0.01) between failure sites of the zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cements. Significantly more bands cemented with the glass ionomer failed at the cement/band interface, leaving the cement adhered to the tooth. Both the glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate cements tested were found to be suitable as orthodontic luting agents. In addition, the favorable failure site of the glass ionomer (cement adhered to enamel) may offer clinical protection against decalcification under loose bands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信