基于学习分析的排行榜反馈方法促进在线协作学习中学生的认知参与和学习表现

IF 8.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Shuang Yu, Junmin Ye, Xinghan Yin, Linjing Wu, Shufan Yu, Mengting Nan, Sheng Luo
{"title":"基于学习分析的排行榜反馈方法促进在线协作学习中学生的认知参与和学习表现","authors":"Shuang Yu,&nbsp;Junmin Ye,&nbsp;Xinghan Yin,&nbsp;Linjing Wu,&nbsp;Shufan Yu,&nbsp;Mengting Nan,&nbsp;Sheng Luo","doi":"10.1111/bjet.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>Cognitive engagement is crucial for achieving positive learning outcomes. However, it is often inadequate in online collaborative learning. While learning analytics feedback can promote learners' engagement, it may have limitations in motivating students to continue participating. As a gamification element, the leaderboard has been shown to boost learning motivation, but its effects in conjunction with learning analytics feedback have not been extensively investigated. This study proposed a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF) and conducted a quasi-experimental study involving 32 engineering students to assess the impact of this approach on student cognitive engagement and their learning performance. The experimental group received LALF, while the control group only received the learning analytics feedback. Utilizing chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and auto-recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), we examined the effects of LALF on the distributions, patterns, and dynamics of cognitive engagement. The results indicated that students in the experimental group exhibited significantly higher high-level cognitive engagement behaviours than those in the control group. Furthermore, students in the experimental group who engaged with the LALF tended to exhibit stronger connections among high-level cognitive engagement behaviours and more stable cognitive engagement patterns than those in the control group. Additionally, the results showed that students in the experimental group achieved higher learning performance than those in the control group. These findings reveal the critical role of combining learning analytics feedback with leaderboards in enhancing cognitive engagement in online collaborative learning, providing important guidance for designing efficient online learning experiences and improving educational quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Cognitive engagement is essential for achieving positive learning outcomes, particularly in online collaborative learning environments.</li>\n \n <li>Learning analytics feedback can enhance learner engagement, but may lack elements that stimulate motivation among students.</li>\n \n <li>The leaderboard is considered a gamification element, potentially boosting learning motivation by fostering a competitive atmosphere.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds?\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>This study introduces a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF), which combines learning analytics feedback and leaderboards.</li>\n \n <li>It provides empirical evidence from a quasi-experimental design involving 32 engineering students, indicating that students who engaged with the LALF demonstrated higher levels of cognitive engagement behaviours compared to those who only received traditional learning analytics feedback.</li>\n \n <li>The study employs various analytical methods, including chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and automated recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), to explore the distributions, patterns and dynamics of cognitive engagement associated with the LALF.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Educators may want to consider integrating leaderboards with learning analytics feedback to foster a competitive yet supportive online learning environment that has the potential to enhance cognitive engagement.</li>\n \n <li>The study highlights the importance of using diverse analytical methods such as ENA and aRQA. Researchers may consider employing these methods to gain deeper insights into student engagement patterns and the efficacy of different instructional strategies.</li>\n \n <li>Institutions could consider offering professional development programs focused on the effective use of learning analytics and various analytical methods. Training educators on how to interpret and apply these analyses can enhance their instructional strategies and improve student engagement.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"57 2","pages":"579-605"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach for promoting student cognitive engagement and learning performance in online collaborative learning\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Yu,&nbsp;Junmin Ye,&nbsp;Xinghan Yin,&nbsp;Linjing Wu,&nbsp;Shufan Yu,&nbsp;Mengting Nan,&nbsp;Sheng Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Cognitive engagement is crucial for achieving positive learning outcomes. However, it is often inadequate in online collaborative learning. While learning analytics feedback can promote learners' engagement, it may have limitations in motivating students to continue participating. As a gamification element, the leaderboard has been shown to boost learning motivation, but its effects in conjunction with learning analytics feedback have not been extensively investigated. This study proposed a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF) and conducted a quasi-experimental study involving 32 engineering students to assess the impact of this approach on student cognitive engagement and their learning performance. The experimental group received LALF, while the control group only received the learning analytics feedback. Utilizing chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and auto-recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), we examined the effects of LALF on the distributions, patterns, and dynamics of cognitive engagement. The results indicated that students in the experimental group exhibited significantly higher high-level cognitive engagement behaviours than those in the control group. Furthermore, students in the experimental group who engaged with the LALF tended to exhibit stronger connections among high-level cognitive engagement behaviours and more stable cognitive engagement patterns than those in the control group. Additionally, the results showed that students in the experimental group achieved higher learning performance than those in the control group. These findings reveal the critical role of combining learning analytics feedback with leaderboards in enhancing cognitive engagement in online collaborative learning, providing important guidance for designing efficient online learning experiences and improving educational quality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\\n <p>What is already known about this topic?\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Cognitive engagement is essential for achieving positive learning outcomes, particularly in online collaborative learning environments.</li>\\n \\n <li>Learning analytics feedback can enhance learner engagement, but may lack elements that stimulate motivation among students.</li>\\n \\n <li>The leaderboard is considered a gamification element, potentially boosting learning motivation by fostering a competitive atmosphere.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>What this paper adds?\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>This study introduces a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF), which combines learning analytics feedback and leaderboards.</li>\\n \\n <li>It provides empirical evidence from a quasi-experimental design involving 32 engineering students, indicating that students who engaged with the LALF demonstrated higher levels of cognitive engagement behaviours compared to those who only received traditional learning analytics feedback.</li>\\n \\n <li>The study employs various analytical methods, including chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and automated recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), to explore the distributions, patterns and dynamics of cognitive engagement associated with the LALF.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Implications for practice and policy\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Educators may want to consider integrating leaderboards with learning analytics feedback to foster a competitive yet supportive online learning environment that has the potential to enhance cognitive engagement.</li>\\n \\n <li>The study highlights the importance of using diverse analytical methods such as ENA and aRQA. Researchers may consider employing these methods to gain deeper insights into student engagement patterns and the efficacy of different instructional strategies.</li>\\n \\n <li>Institutions could consider offering professional development programs focused on the effective use of learning analytics and various analytical methods. Training educators on how to interpret and apply these analyses can enhance their instructional strategies and improve student engagement.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"579-605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知参与对于取得积极的学习成果至关重要。然而,在网络协作学习中,它往往是不够的。虽然学习分析反馈可以提高学习者的参与度,但它在激励学生继续参与方面可能存在局限性。作为一种游戏化元素,排行榜能够提升学习动机,但其与学习分析反馈相结合的效果尚未得到广泛研究。本研究提出了一种基于学习分析的排行榜反馈方法(LALF),并对32名工科学生进行了准实验研究,以评估该方法对学生认知投入和学习表现的影响。实验组接受LALF,对照组只接受学习分析反馈。利用卡方检验、认知网络分析(ENA)和自递归量化分析(aRQA),我们研究了LALF对认知参与的分布、模式和动态的影响。结果表明,实验组学生表现出的高层次认知投入行为显著高于对照组。此外,与对照组相比,参与LALF的实验组学生表现出更强的高水平认知参与行为之间的联系和更稳定的认知参与模式。此外,实验结果显示实验组学生的学习成绩高于对照组学生。这些发现揭示了将学习分析反馈与排行榜相结合在增强在线协作学习中的认知参与方面的关键作用,为设计高效的在线学习体验和提高教育质量提供了重要指导。关于这个主题我们已经知道了什么?认知参与对于取得积极的学习成果至关重要,尤其是在在线协作学习环境中。学习分析反馈可以提高学习者的参与度,但可能缺乏激发学生动机的元素。排行榜被认为是一种游戏化元素,可以通过营造竞争氛围来促进学习动机。这篇文章补充了什么?本研究介绍了一种基于学习分析的排行榜反馈方法(LALF),它将学习分析反馈与排行榜相结合。它提供了一项涉及32名工程专业学生的准实验设计的经验证据,表明与那些只接受传统学习分析反馈的学生相比,参与LALF的学生表现出更高水平的认知参与行为。本研究采用多种分析方法,包括卡方检验、认知网络分析(ENA)和自动递归量化分析(aRQA),探讨与LALF相关的认知参与的分布、模式和动态。教育工作者可能会考虑将排行榜与学习分析反馈相结合,以营造一个有竞争力但又有支持性的在线学习环境,从而有可能提高认知参与度。该研究强调了使用ENA和aRQA等多种分析方法的重要性。研究人员可以考虑采用这些方法来深入了解学生的参与模式和不同教学策略的效果。机构可以考虑提供专业发展项目,重点关注学习分析和各种分析方法的有效使用。培训教育工作者如何解释和应用这些分析可以增强他们的教学策略,提高学生的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach for promoting student cognitive engagement and learning performance in online collaborative learning

Cognitive engagement is crucial for achieving positive learning outcomes. However, it is often inadequate in online collaborative learning. While learning analytics feedback can promote learners' engagement, it may have limitations in motivating students to continue participating. As a gamification element, the leaderboard has been shown to boost learning motivation, but its effects in conjunction with learning analytics feedback have not been extensively investigated. This study proposed a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF) and conducted a quasi-experimental study involving 32 engineering students to assess the impact of this approach on student cognitive engagement and their learning performance. The experimental group received LALF, while the control group only received the learning analytics feedback. Utilizing chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and auto-recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), we examined the effects of LALF on the distributions, patterns, and dynamics of cognitive engagement. The results indicated that students in the experimental group exhibited significantly higher high-level cognitive engagement behaviours than those in the control group. Furthermore, students in the experimental group who engaged with the LALF tended to exhibit stronger connections among high-level cognitive engagement behaviours and more stable cognitive engagement patterns than those in the control group. Additionally, the results showed that students in the experimental group achieved higher learning performance than those in the control group. These findings reveal the critical role of combining learning analytics feedback with leaderboards in enhancing cognitive engagement in online collaborative learning, providing important guidance for designing efficient online learning experiences and improving educational quality.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic?

  • Cognitive engagement is essential for achieving positive learning outcomes, particularly in online collaborative learning environments.
  • Learning analytics feedback can enhance learner engagement, but may lack elements that stimulate motivation among students.
  • The leaderboard is considered a gamification element, potentially boosting learning motivation by fostering a competitive atmosphere.

What this paper adds?

  • This study introduces a learning analytics-based leaderboard feedback approach (LALF), which combines learning analytics feedback and leaderboards.
  • It provides empirical evidence from a quasi-experimental design involving 32 engineering students, indicating that students who engaged with the LALF demonstrated higher levels of cognitive engagement behaviours compared to those who only received traditional learning analytics feedback.
  • The study employs various analytical methods, including chi-squared tests, epistemic network analysis (ENA) and automated recurrence quantification analysis (aRQA), to explore the distributions, patterns and dynamics of cognitive engagement associated with the LALF.

Implications for practice and policy

  • Educators may want to consider integrating leaderboards with learning analytics feedback to foster a competitive yet supportive online learning environment that has the potential to enhance cognitive engagement.
  • The study highlights the importance of using diverse analytical methods such as ENA and aRQA. Researchers may consider employing these methods to gain deeper insights into student engagement patterns and the efficacy of different instructional strategies.
  • Institutions could consider offering professional development programs focused on the effective use of learning analytics and various analytical methods. Training educators on how to interpret and apply these analyses can enhance their instructional strategies and improve student engagement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书