{"title":"基于相似度的三向决策方法及其在矿山潜力评价中的应用","authors":"Tianli Su, Yanling Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many existing interval-valued three-way decision methods primarily rely on crisp similarity assessments. Besides, they usually focus on single-objective modeling based on utility maximization or loss minimization, which may lead to conservative and biased outcomes. To address these issues, this paper develops a similarity degree-based interval-valued three-way decision method that integrates utilities and losses within a unified framework. Specifically, we define similarity degrees between interval values by a distance function, and further derive similarity-driven conditional probabilities, relative utility and loss functions. On this basis, we compute expected utilities and expected losses. Furthermore, we combine them via a risk-preference coefficient to obtain the expected values of alternatives, which can be used to reasonably categorize and rank alternatives. Moreover, the proposed method is applied in mine potential evaluation, and the evaluation results exhibit a high level of agreement with practical exploitation outcomes. What’s more, comparative analyses and sensitivity experiments further confirm that the method achieves more accurate and robust decision performance than some representative methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 109639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A similarity degree-based three-way decision method with application to mine potential evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Tianli Su, Yanling Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many existing interval-valued three-way decision methods primarily rely on crisp similarity assessments. Besides, they usually focus on single-objective modeling based on utility maximization or loss minimization, which may lead to conservative and biased outcomes. To address these issues, this paper develops a similarity degree-based interval-valued three-way decision method that integrates utilities and losses within a unified framework. Specifically, we define similarity degrees between interval values by a distance function, and further derive similarity-driven conditional probabilities, relative utility and loss functions. On this basis, we compute expected utilities and expected losses. Furthermore, we combine them via a risk-preference coefficient to obtain the expected values of alternatives, which can be used to reasonably categorize and rank alternatives. Moreover, the proposed method is applied in mine potential evaluation, and the evaluation results exhibit a high level of agreement with practical exploitation outcomes. What’s more, comparative analyses and sensitivity experiments further confirm that the method achieves more accurate and robust decision performance than some representative methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X26000150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X26000150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A similarity degree-based three-way decision method with application to mine potential evaluation
Many existing interval-valued three-way decision methods primarily rely on crisp similarity assessments. Besides, they usually focus on single-objective modeling based on utility maximization or loss minimization, which may lead to conservative and biased outcomes. To address these issues, this paper develops a similarity degree-based interval-valued three-way decision method that integrates utilities and losses within a unified framework. Specifically, we define similarity degrees between interval values by a distance function, and further derive similarity-driven conditional probabilities, relative utility and loss functions. On this basis, we compute expected utilities and expected losses. Furthermore, we combine them via a risk-preference coefficient to obtain the expected values of alternatives, which can be used to reasonably categorize and rank alternatives. Moreover, the proposed method is applied in mine potential evaluation, and the evaluation results exhibit a high level of agreement with practical exploitation outcomes. What’s more, comparative analyses and sensitivity experiments further confirm that the method achieves more accurate and robust decision performance than some representative methods.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest.
Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning.
Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.