根源与影响:南非农村多中心治理的基于地方的进程

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Rural Studies Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054
Anthony St Leger Fry
{"title":"根源与影响:南非农村多中心治理的基于地方的进程","authors":"Anthony St Leger Fry","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104054"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Anthony St Leger Fry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000562\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于制度薄弱、腐败以及传统和民主治理体系之间复杂的重叠,南非前家园的农村人口面临着持续的边缘化。多中心治理的特点是跨层次的半自治节点,促进问责和适应,为应对这些挑战提供了一个框架,但关于民间社会组织如何做出贡献的研究仍然有限。本研究考察了在这种背景下,基于地方的公民社会组织如何出现并生存下来,从而实现理想的系统性变革。通过与7家知名机构建立研究实践伙伴关系,通过160份组织文件和20次对高级员工的半结构化访谈收集了数据。归纳主题分析、时间轴映射和变化图理论揭示了由两个核心主题:关系和影响构成的九个相互关联的基于地点的过程。这些过程形成了一个核心轨迹,从集中精力到培养可信度和促进学习,通过强化反馈循环(例如,重新构建农村地区功能性机构的潜力)放大了这一轨迹,并以自主与嵌入、成长与扎根等紧张关系为特征。研究结果强调了新兴组织的实际经验教训,并强调了对这些组织进行持续投资的必要性,这些组织是系统学习、农村代理和多中心的关键节点。这项工作通过阐明被低估的创新领域,倡导采用实践为依据的方法,使农村主导的解决方案合法化和规模化,为治理文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa

Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa
Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书