{"title":"根源与影响:南非农村多中心治理的基于地方的进程","authors":"Anthony St Leger Fry","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104054"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Anthony St Leger Fry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000562\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016726000562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa
Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.