正能量区是否在较富裕的欧洲地区更为普遍?

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2026.104603
Drilona Shtjefni , Giulia Ulpiani , Andreas Uihlein , Silvia Bossi , Christopher Gollner , Giorgos Koukoufikis , Paolo Bertoldi
{"title":"正能量区是否在较富裕的欧洲地区更为普遍?","authors":"Drilona Shtjefni ,&nbsp;Giulia Ulpiani ,&nbsp;Andreas Uihlein ,&nbsp;Silvia Bossi ,&nbsp;Christopher Gollner ,&nbsp;Giorgos Koukoufikis ,&nbsp;Paolo Bertoldi","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the spatial relationship between renewable energy potential, economic prosperity, and the establishment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) across European regions. PEDs are connected clusters of buildings that generate a surplus of renewable energy on a yearly basis through local energy production and consumption, energy storage, and direct management of renewable energy sources. Beyond their technical contribution to energy transitions, PEDs are also positioned as mechanisms for economic development, energy citizenship, democracy, and energy justice. While existing literature has predominantly focused on the technical dimensions of PEDs (e.g., energy efficiency, renewables, flexibility), little attention has been devoted to their territorial dimensions, specifically, where PEDs are implemented and under what local conditions they emerge. This study aims to investigate whether PEDs are more frequently installed in areas with higher GDP per capita and/or renewable energy potential compared to non-PED areas. A comparative analysis using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests indicates that PEDs are primarily concentrated in areas with high GDP per capita, but not necessarily in regions with high renewable energy potential. These findings underscore the need to investigate further on the enabling conditions which shape the design and geographic distribution of PEDs, ensuring that their benefits extend beyond high-income regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104603"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are positive energy districts more prevalent in wealthier European regions?\",\"authors\":\"Drilona Shtjefni ,&nbsp;Giulia Ulpiani ,&nbsp;Andreas Uihlein ,&nbsp;Silvia Bossi ,&nbsp;Christopher Gollner ,&nbsp;Giorgos Koukoufikis ,&nbsp;Paolo Bertoldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the spatial relationship between renewable energy potential, economic prosperity, and the establishment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) across European regions. PEDs are connected clusters of buildings that generate a surplus of renewable energy on a yearly basis through local energy production and consumption, energy storage, and direct management of renewable energy sources. Beyond their technical contribution to energy transitions, PEDs are also positioned as mechanisms for economic development, energy citizenship, democracy, and energy justice. While existing literature has predominantly focused on the technical dimensions of PEDs (e.g., energy efficiency, renewables, flexibility), little attention has been devoted to their territorial dimensions, specifically, where PEDs are implemented and under what local conditions they emerge. This study aims to investigate whether PEDs are more frequently installed in areas with higher GDP per capita and/or renewable energy potential compared to non-PED areas. A comparative analysis using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests indicates that PEDs are primarily concentrated in areas with high GDP per capita, but not necessarily in regions with high renewable energy potential. These findings underscore the need to investigate further on the enabling conditions which shape the design and geographic distribution of PEDs, ensuring that their benefits extend beyond high-income regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000745\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626000745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了欧洲地区可再生能源潜力、经济繁荣和正能量区(PEDs)建立之间的空间关系。PEDs是连接在一起的建筑群,通过当地的能源生产和消费、能源储存和可再生能源的直接管理,每年产生过剩的可再生能源。除了对能源转型的技术贡献外,ped还被定位为经济发展、能源公民、民主和能源正义的机制。虽然现有的文献主要集中在可持续发展的技术层面(例如,能源效率、可再生能源、灵活性),但很少关注其地域层面,特别是在哪里实施可持续发展以及在什么当地条件下出现。本研究旨在调查与非ped地区相比,ped是否更频繁地安装在人均GDP和/或可再生能源潜力较高的地区。使用描述性统计和非参数检验的比较分析表明,发展中国家主要集中在人均国内总产值高的地区,但不一定集中在可再生能源潜力大的地区。这些发现强调有必要进一步调查影响公共发展项目设计和地理分布的有利条件,以确保其效益超出高收入地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are positive energy districts more prevalent in wealthier European regions?
This study investigates the spatial relationship between renewable energy potential, economic prosperity, and the establishment of Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) across European regions. PEDs are connected clusters of buildings that generate a surplus of renewable energy on a yearly basis through local energy production and consumption, energy storage, and direct management of renewable energy sources. Beyond their technical contribution to energy transitions, PEDs are also positioned as mechanisms for economic development, energy citizenship, democracy, and energy justice. While existing literature has predominantly focused on the technical dimensions of PEDs (e.g., energy efficiency, renewables, flexibility), little attention has been devoted to their territorial dimensions, specifically, where PEDs are implemented and under what local conditions they emerge. This study aims to investigate whether PEDs are more frequently installed in areas with higher GDP per capita and/or renewable energy potential compared to non-PED areas. A comparative analysis using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests indicates that PEDs are primarily concentrated in areas with high GDP per capita, but not necessarily in regions with high renewable energy potential. These findings underscore the need to investigate further on the enabling conditions which shape the design and geographic distribution of PEDs, ensuring that their benefits extend beyond high-income regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书