{"title":"三维非对称载荷作用下裸眼的热-水-力耦合解析解","authors":"Weizhe Qiu, Bo Zhou, Xiaotian Li, Jiahao Li, Xudong Zhang, Xiuxing Zhu, Peng Jia","doi":"10.1016/j.gete.2026.100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integrity of open-hole wellbores in deep, high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT), and unconventional reservoirs is critically affected by the coupled interactions of mechanical loads, temperature variations, and pore fluid seepage. This Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical (T–H–M) coupling governs the evolution of the near-wellbore stress field and plays a decisive role in maintaining wellbore stability under complex geological conditions However, existing studies often rely on two-dimensional simplifications or slow numerical models, and lack a generalized analytical framework to characterize three-dimensional (3D) asymmetric T–H–M coupling. To address this limitation, this study develops a 3D steady-state analytical solution for the T–H–M coupled near-wellbore stress field in open-hole formations. Using the linear superposition principle, we decompose the coupled system into three independent subproblems… and superimpose their analytical solutions to obtain the total stress field under linearly depth-dependent loads. The results reveal a pronounced non-axisymmetric stress distribution governed by horizontal stress anisotropy, with the maximum circumferential compression occurring in the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress. Temperature differentials between the drilling fluid and the formation exert a dominant influence on wellbore stability: fluid cooling—occurring when the drilling-fluid temperature is lower than the formation temperature—induces thermal tensile stresses that mitigate compressive stress concentrations and thereby suppress shear failure; in contrast, fluid heating exacerbates compressive stresses and promotes wellbore instability. Seepage-induced tensile stresses near the wellbore wall counteract mechanical and thermal compression, resulting in radial stress reversal in the near-wellbore zone. The proposed analytical solution provides an accurate, computationally efficient, and physically interpretable framework for predicting near-wellbore stress distributions under complex three-dimensional thermal–mechanical–hydraulic coupling conditions; it delivers both theoretical insight and actionable guidance for temperature management, drilling-fluid system optimization, and wellbore integrity design in deep, high-pressure high-temperature, and geothermal drilling applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56008,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical (T–H–M) coupled analytical solution for an open-hole under 3D asymmetric loads\",\"authors\":\"Weizhe Qiu, Bo Zhou, Xiaotian Li, Jiahao Li, Xudong Zhang, Xiuxing Zhu, Peng Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gete.2026.100802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The integrity of open-hole wellbores in deep, high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT), and unconventional reservoirs is critically affected by the coupled interactions of mechanical loads, temperature variations, and pore fluid seepage. This Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical (T–H–M) coupling governs the evolution of the near-wellbore stress field and plays a decisive role in maintaining wellbore stability under complex geological conditions However, existing studies often rely on two-dimensional simplifications or slow numerical models, and lack a generalized analytical framework to characterize three-dimensional (3D) asymmetric T–H–M coupling. To address this limitation, this study develops a 3D steady-state analytical solution for the T–H–M coupled near-wellbore stress field in open-hole formations. Using the linear superposition principle, we decompose the coupled system into three independent subproblems… and superimpose their analytical solutions to obtain the total stress field under linearly depth-dependent loads. The results reveal a pronounced non-axisymmetric stress distribution governed by horizontal stress anisotropy, with the maximum circumferential compression occurring in the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress. Temperature differentials between the drilling fluid and the formation exert a dominant influence on wellbore stability: fluid cooling—occurring when the drilling-fluid temperature is lower than the formation temperature—induces thermal tensile stresses that mitigate compressive stress concentrations and thereby suppress shear failure; in contrast, fluid heating exacerbates compressive stresses and promotes wellbore instability. Seepage-induced tensile stresses near the wellbore wall counteract mechanical and thermal compression, resulting in radial stress reversal in the near-wellbore zone. The proposed analytical solution provides an accurate, computationally efficient, and physically interpretable framework for predicting near-wellbore stress distributions under complex three-dimensional thermal–mechanical–hydraulic coupling conditions; it delivers both theoretical insight and actionable guidance for temperature management, drilling-fluid system optimization, and wellbore integrity design in deep, high-pressure high-temperature, and geothermal drilling applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380826000171\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380826000171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical (T–H–M) coupled analytical solution for an open-hole under 3D asymmetric loads
The integrity of open-hole wellbores in deep, high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT), and unconventional reservoirs is critically affected by the coupled interactions of mechanical loads, temperature variations, and pore fluid seepage. This Thermo–Hydro–Mechanical (T–H–M) coupling governs the evolution of the near-wellbore stress field and plays a decisive role in maintaining wellbore stability under complex geological conditions However, existing studies often rely on two-dimensional simplifications or slow numerical models, and lack a generalized analytical framework to characterize three-dimensional (3D) asymmetric T–H–M coupling. To address this limitation, this study develops a 3D steady-state analytical solution for the T–H–M coupled near-wellbore stress field in open-hole formations. Using the linear superposition principle, we decompose the coupled system into three independent subproblems… and superimpose their analytical solutions to obtain the total stress field under linearly depth-dependent loads. The results reveal a pronounced non-axisymmetric stress distribution governed by horizontal stress anisotropy, with the maximum circumferential compression occurring in the direction of the minimum horizontal principal stress. Temperature differentials between the drilling fluid and the formation exert a dominant influence on wellbore stability: fluid cooling—occurring when the drilling-fluid temperature is lower than the formation temperature—induces thermal tensile stresses that mitigate compressive stress concentrations and thereby suppress shear failure; in contrast, fluid heating exacerbates compressive stresses and promotes wellbore instability. Seepage-induced tensile stresses near the wellbore wall counteract mechanical and thermal compression, resulting in radial stress reversal in the near-wellbore zone. The proposed analytical solution provides an accurate, computationally efficient, and physically interpretable framework for predicting near-wellbore stress distributions under complex three-dimensional thermal–mechanical–hydraulic coupling conditions; it delivers both theoretical insight and actionable guidance for temperature management, drilling-fluid system optimization, and wellbore integrity design in deep, high-pressure high-temperature, and geothermal drilling applications.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to publish research results of the highest quality and of lasting importance on the subject of geomechanics, with the focus on applications to geological energy production and storage, and the interaction of soils and rocks with the natural and engineered environment. Special attention is given to concepts and developments of new energy geotechnologies that comprise intrinsic mechanisms protecting the environment against a potential engineering induced damage, hence warranting sustainable usage of energy resources.
The scope of the journal is broad, including fundamental concepts in geomechanics and mechanics of porous media, the experiments and analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Of special interest are issues resulting from coupling of particular physics, chemistry and biology of external forcings, as well as of pore fluid/gas and minerals to the solid mechanics of the medium skeleton and pore fluid mechanics. The multi-scale and inter-scale interactions between the phenomena and the behavior representations are also of particular interest. Contributions to general theoretical approach to these issues, but of potential reference to geomechanics in its context of energy and the environment are also most welcome.