基于三维景观视角的多山城市生态脆弱性诊断

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107920
Peijia Peng , Xun Lin , Yu Bao
{"title":"基于三维景观视角的多山城市生态脆弱性诊断","authors":"Peijia Peng ,&nbsp;Xun Lin ,&nbsp;Yu Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In fragile karst mountain cities, the conflict between intense development activities and ecosystem integrity poses significant challenges to sustainable design. Although urban expansion is often studied through two-dimensional landscape patterns, the critical role of three-dimensional spatial structures remains poorly understood, limiting effective ecological engineering interventions. This study focuses on Guiyang's built-up area from 2010 to 2023, establishing a foundation for ecosystem restoration planning by diagnosing ecological vulnerability mechanisms. By integrating the PSR model with spatial analysis techniques (geodetector, bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis, and GTWR), we quantified the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological vulnerability and elucidated the influence mechanisms of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional landscape patterns. The findings provide actionable insights for ecological engineering practice: (1) From 2010 to 2023, Guiyang's built-up area exhibited a distinct landscape pattern characterized by intensive, orderly development in the core zone and fragmented expansion in peripheral areas. Overall ecological vulnerability intensified, manifesting as a spatiotemporal pattern of expansion from the center to the periphery. (2) Three-dimensional building indicators—BN, BCR, FAR, and BRI—exhibit stronger explanatory power for ecological vulnerability, indicating that vertical urban expansion is the dominant driver of ecological fragility; (3) Natural topography exhibits a double-edged sword effect: contiguous vegetation in complex terrain can serve as natural buffers, while specific topographies in southern and peripheral areas require targeted engineering measures to prevent exacerbating anthropogenic pressures. (4) While two-dimensional landscape patterns are not direct pressure sources, high concentrations of developed land significantly amplify vulnerability. Landscape composition uniformity shows a significant negative correlation with ecological vulnerability, with high-vulnerability zones consistently occurring in overlapping areas of high building density and spatial concentration. The mechanism revealed in this study—“three-dimensional building drivers—two-dimensional pattern regulation—natural topography constraints”—provides a scientific framework for future ecological engineering practices. This framework aims to mitigate ecological vulnerability in karst mountain cities and promote sustainable ecosystem design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 107920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing urban ecological vulnerability in multi-mountainous city from a 3D landscape perspective\",\"authors\":\"Peijia Peng ,&nbsp;Xun Lin ,&nbsp;Yu Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In fragile karst mountain cities, the conflict between intense development activities and ecosystem integrity poses significant challenges to sustainable design. Although urban expansion is often studied through two-dimensional landscape patterns, the critical role of three-dimensional spatial structures remains poorly understood, limiting effective ecological engineering interventions. This study focuses on Guiyang's built-up area from 2010 to 2023, establishing a foundation for ecosystem restoration planning by diagnosing ecological vulnerability mechanisms. By integrating the PSR model with spatial analysis techniques (geodetector, bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis, and GTWR), we quantified the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological vulnerability and elucidated the influence mechanisms of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional landscape patterns. The findings provide actionable insights for ecological engineering practice: (1) From 2010 to 2023, Guiyang's built-up area exhibited a distinct landscape pattern characterized by intensive, orderly development in the core zone and fragmented expansion in peripheral areas. Overall ecological vulnerability intensified, manifesting as a spatiotemporal pattern of expansion from the center to the periphery. (2) Three-dimensional building indicators—BN, BCR, FAR, and BRI—exhibit stronger explanatory power for ecological vulnerability, indicating that vertical urban expansion is the dominant driver of ecological fragility; (3) Natural topography exhibits a double-edged sword effect: contiguous vegetation in complex terrain can serve as natural buffers, while specific topographies in southern and peripheral areas require targeted engineering measures to prevent exacerbating anthropogenic pressures. (4) While two-dimensional landscape patterns are not direct pressure sources, high concentrations of developed land significantly amplify vulnerability. Landscape composition uniformity shows a significant negative correlation with ecological vulnerability, with high-vulnerability zones consistently occurring in overlapping areas of high building density and spatial concentration. The mechanism revealed in this study—“three-dimensional building drivers—two-dimensional pattern regulation—natural topography constraints”—provides a scientific framework for future ecological engineering practices. This framework aims to mitigate ecological vulnerability in karst mountain cities and promote sustainable ecosystem design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在脆弱的喀斯特山区城市,激烈的开发活动与生态系统完整性之间的冲突对可持续设计提出了重大挑战。虽然城市扩张通常通过二维景观模式进行研究,但三维空间结构的关键作用仍然知之甚少,限制了有效的生态工程干预。本研究以贵阳市2010 - 2023年建成区为研究对象,通过对生态脆弱性机制的诊断,为生态系统恢复规划奠定基础。通过将PSR模型与空间分析技术(地理探测器、二元空间自相关分析和GTWR)相结合,量化了生态脆弱性的时空动态,并阐明了二维和三维景观格局的影响机制。结果表明:①2010—2023年,贵阳市建成区景观格局呈现出核心区集约有序发展、外围破碎扩张的明显特征;整体生态脆弱性加剧,呈现由中心向外围扩展的时空格局。(2)三维建筑指标bn、BCR、FAR和bri对生态脆弱性的解释能力更强,表明城市垂直扩张是生态脆弱性的主导驱动力;(3)自然地形具有双刃剑效应,复杂地形中的连片植被具有天然缓冲作用,而南部和周边地区的特定地形则需要有针对性的工程措施,以防止人为压力的加剧。(4)虽然二维景观格局不是直接压力源,但高度集中的已开发土地显著放大了脆弱性。景观组成均匀性与生态脆弱性呈显著负相关,高脆弱性区始终出现在建筑密度高、空间集中度高的重叠区域。该研究揭示的机制——“三维建筑驱动因素-二维格局调节-自然地形约束”——为未来的生态工程实践提供了科学框架。该框架旨在缓解喀斯特山地城市的生态脆弱性,促进可持续的生态系统设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnosing urban ecological vulnerability in multi-mountainous city from a 3D landscape perspective

Diagnosing urban ecological vulnerability in multi-mountainous city from a 3D landscape perspective
In fragile karst mountain cities, the conflict between intense development activities and ecosystem integrity poses significant challenges to sustainable design. Although urban expansion is often studied through two-dimensional landscape patterns, the critical role of three-dimensional spatial structures remains poorly understood, limiting effective ecological engineering interventions. This study focuses on Guiyang's built-up area from 2010 to 2023, establishing a foundation for ecosystem restoration planning by diagnosing ecological vulnerability mechanisms. By integrating the PSR model with spatial analysis techniques (geodetector, bivariate spatial autocorrelation analysis, and GTWR), we quantified the spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological vulnerability and elucidated the influence mechanisms of both two-dimensional and three-dimensional landscape patterns. The findings provide actionable insights for ecological engineering practice: (1) From 2010 to 2023, Guiyang's built-up area exhibited a distinct landscape pattern characterized by intensive, orderly development in the core zone and fragmented expansion in peripheral areas. Overall ecological vulnerability intensified, manifesting as a spatiotemporal pattern of expansion from the center to the periphery. (2) Three-dimensional building indicators—BN, BCR, FAR, and BRI—exhibit stronger explanatory power for ecological vulnerability, indicating that vertical urban expansion is the dominant driver of ecological fragility; (3) Natural topography exhibits a double-edged sword effect: contiguous vegetation in complex terrain can serve as natural buffers, while specific topographies in southern and peripheral areas require targeted engineering measures to prevent exacerbating anthropogenic pressures. (4) While two-dimensional landscape patterns are not direct pressure sources, high concentrations of developed land significantly amplify vulnerability. Landscape composition uniformity shows a significant negative correlation with ecological vulnerability, with high-vulnerability zones consistently occurring in overlapping areas of high building density and spatial concentration. The mechanism revealed in this study—“three-dimensional building drivers—two-dimensional pattern regulation—natural topography constraints”—provides a scientific framework for future ecological engineering practices. This framework aims to mitigate ecological vulnerability in karst mountain cities and promote sustainable ecosystem design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书