特大城市群海岸带生态网络建设与弹性优化——以粤港澳大湾区为例

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107916
Yilin Huang , Hui Li , Yun He , Qing Xu , Lixia Liao , Han Sheng , Jiaheng Du
{"title":"特大城市群海岸带生态网络建设与弹性优化——以粤港澳大湾区为例","authors":"Yilin Huang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Yun He ,&nbsp;Qing Xu ,&nbsp;Lixia Liao ,&nbsp;Han Sheng ,&nbsp;Jiaheng Du","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal zones in rapidly urbanizing regions are increasingly threatened by climate change and human activities, yet conventional static ecological network planning inadequately addresses future dynamic risks. Focusing on the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), we present a resilience-oriented optimization framework that couples dynamic ecosystem-service projections with multi-scenario climate stressors (sea-level rise, storm surges, and pluvial flooding). The framework integrates risk forecasting, spatial optimization, and dual resilience assessment based on complex-network metrics and simulated attack models. Results show that the optimized network substantially improved structural connectivity and functional redundancy: key and important corridors increased by 133.3% and 348.7%, respectively; robustness and redundancy rose by 11% and 30%. Under simulated dynamic attacks, the optimized network tolerated a substantially higher proportion of critical-node failures before functional collapse compared with the pre-optimization network. Our approach demonstrates that incorporating dynamic risk projections into ecological-network planning markedly enhances system resilience and provides transferable spatial solutions for balancing conservation and climate adaptation in densely urbanized coastal regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 107916"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological network construction and resilience optimization of coastal zones in megacity clusters: A case study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area\",\"authors\":\"Yilin Huang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Yun He ,&nbsp;Qing Xu ,&nbsp;Lixia Liao ,&nbsp;Han Sheng ,&nbsp;Jiaheng Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coastal zones in rapidly urbanizing regions are increasingly threatened by climate change and human activities, yet conventional static ecological network planning inadequately addresses future dynamic risks. Focusing on the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), we present a resilience-oriented optimization framework that couples dynamic ecosystem-service projections with multi-scenario climate stressors (sea-level rise, storm surges, and pluvial flooding). The framework integrates risk forecasting, spatial optimization, and dual resilience assessment based on complex-network metrics and simulated attack models. Results show that the optimized network substantially improved structural connectivity and functional redundancy: key and important corridors increased by 133.3% and 348.7%, respectively; robustness and redundancy rose by 11% and 30%. Under simulated dynamic attacks, the optimized network tolerated a substantially higher proportion of critical-node failures before functional collapse compared with the pre-optimization network. Our approach demonstrates that incorporating dynamic risk projections into ecological-network planning markedly enhances system resilience and provides transferable spatial solutions for balancing conservation and climate adaptation in densely urbanized coastal regions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000261\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857426000261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速城市化地区海岸带日益受到气候变化和人类活动的威胁,而传统的静态生态网络规划不足以应对未来的动态风险。以粤港澳大湾区(GBA)为研究对象,提出了一个以弹性为导向的优化框架,该框架将动态生态系统服务预测与多情景气候压力因素(海平面上升、风暴潮和洪水)相结合。该框架集成了基于复杂网络指标和模拟攻击模型的风险预测、空间优化和双重弹性评估。结果表明:优化后的网络结构连通性和功能冗余度显著提高,关键通道和重要通道分别提高了133.3%和348.7%;健壮性和冗余度分别提高了11%和30%。在模拟的动态攻击下,与优化前的网络相比,优化后的网络在功能崩溃前容忍的关键节点故障比例要高得多。我们的方法表明,将动态风险预测纳入生态网络规划显著提高了系统弹性,并为在城市化密集的沿海地区平衡保护和气候适应提供了可转移的空间解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological network construction and resilience optimization of coastal zones in megacity clusters: A case study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area
Coastal zones in rapidly urbanizing regions are increasingly threatened by climate change and human activities, yet conventional static ecological network planning inadequately addresses future dynamic risks. Focusing on the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), we present a resilience-oriented optimization framework that couples dynamic ecosystem-service projections with multi-scenario climate stressors (sea-level rise, storm surges, and pluvial flooding). The framework integrates risk forecasting, spatial optimization, and dual resilience assessment based on complex-network metrics and simulated attack models. Results show that the optimized network substantially improved structural connectivity and functional redundancy: key and important corridors increased by 133.3% and 348.7%, respectively; robustness and redundancy rose by 11% and 30%. Under simulated dynamic attacks, the optimized network tolerated a substantially higher proportion of critical-node failures before functional collapse compared with the pre-optimization network. Our approach demonstrates that incorporating dynamic risk projections into ecological-network planning markedly enhances system resilience and provides transferable spatial solutions for balancing conservation and climate adaptation in densely urbanized coastal regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书