日本人群社交焦虑障碍二价恐惧评估模型的心理测量特征及网络结构研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103128
Shota Noda , Sho Okawa , Motohiro Nishiuchi , Maaya Kobayashi , Justin W. Weeks , Stefan G. Hofmann
{"title":"日本人群社交焦虑障碍二价恐惧评估模型的心理测量特征及网络结构研究。","authors":"Shota Noda ,&nbsp;Sho Okawa ,&nbsp;Motohiro Nishiuchi ,&nbsp;Maaya Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Justin W. Weeks ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the psychometric properties and network structures of the bivalent fear of evaluation model of social anxiety disorder in a Japanese population\",\"authors\":\"Shota Noda ,&nbsp;Sho Okawa ,&nbsp;Motohiro Nishiuchi ,&nbsp;Maaya Kobayashi ,&nbsp;Justin W. Weeks ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618526000204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618526000204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交焦虑障碍(social anxiety disorder, SAD)的双价评价恐惧(BFOE)模型认为,评价恐惧由两种不同的效价组成:消极评价恐惧(FNE)和积极评价恐惧(FPE)。为了反映这一模型,BFOE量表(BFOE Scale)通过将已建立的FNE和FPE测量中的项目合并为一个综合量表而开发出来。本研究旨在(1)评估日本版bfoe的心理测量特性,(2)研究日本有和没有SAD的个体的FNE、FPE和SAD症状的网络结构。共有401名自我报告诊断为SAD的个体和373名未自我报告诊断为SAD的个体完成了评估FNE、FPE、SAD症状、自我集中注意力、事件后加工和抑郁症状的问卷调查。验证性因素分析支持bfoe的相关双因素模型(FNE和FPE因素)。探索性图分析揭示了bfoe的二维结构。Cronbach’s α和McDonald’s ω系数表明内部一致性高。相关分析显示bfoe因素与sad相关构念之间存在小到中度的正相关。部分相关分析表明,FNE和FPE因素与抑郁相关构念的相关性比与抑郁症状的相关性更强,支持收敛效度和判别效度。网络比较测试显示,SAD和非SAD群体在全球网络结构和连通性方面没有显著差异。然而,两组之间的核心症状略有不同:在SAD患者中,“担心他人的想法和自己留下的印象”和“害怕与陌生人交谈”是最核心的。相比之下,在非sad组中,“避免尴尬”和“因心悸而苦恼”是最重要的。这些发现在SAD的BFOE模型框架内进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the psychometric properties and network structures of the bivalent fear of evaluation model of social anxiety disorder in a Japanese population
The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书