Shota Noda , Sho Okawa , Motohiro Nishiuchi , Maaya Kobayashi , Justin W. Weeks , Stefan G. Hofmann
{"title":"日本人群社交焦虑障碍二价恐惧评估模型的心理测量特征及网络结构研究。","authors":"Shota Noda , Sho Okawa , Motohiro Nishiuchi , Maaya Kobayashi , Justin W. Weeks , Stefan G. Hofmann","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the psychometric properties and network structures of the bivalent fear of evaluation model of social anxiety disorder in a Japanese population\",\"authors\":\"Shota Noda , Sho Okawa , Motohiro Nishiuchi , Maaya Kobayashi , Justin W. Weeks , Stefan G. Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.janxdis.2026.103128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anxiety Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618526000204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618526000204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the psychometric properties and network structures of the bivalent fear of evaluation model of social anxiety disorder in a Japanese population
The bivalent fear of evaluation (BFOE) model of social anxiety disorder (SAD) posits that fear of evaluation consists of two distinct valences: fear of negative evaluation (FNE) and fear of positive evaluation (FPE). Reflecting this model, the BFOE Scale (BFOES) was developed by combining items from established FNE and FPE measures into a single integrated scale. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the BFOES, and (2) examine the network structures of FNE, FPE, and SAD symptoms among Japanese individuals with and without SAD. A total of 401 individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of SAD and 373 without a self-reported diagnosis of SAD completed questionnaires assessing FNE, FPE, SAD symptoms, self-focused attention, post-event processing, and depressive symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a correlated two-factor model for the BFOES (FNE and FPE factors). Exploratory graph analyses revealed a two-dimensional structure for the BFOES. Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω coefficients indicated high internal consistency. Correlational analyses showed small to moderate positive associations between BFOES factors and SAD-related constructs. Partial correlational analyses indicated that the FNE and FPE factors were more strongly associated with SAD-related constructs than with depressive symptoms, supporting convergent and discriminant validity. A network comparison test revealed no significant differences between SAD and non-SAD groups in the global network structure and connectivity. However, central symptoms differed slightly between the groups: among individuals with SAD, “concern about others’ thoughts and the impressions one leaves” and “fear of talking to strangers” were most central. In contrast, in the non-SAD group, “avoidance of embarrassment” and “distress over palpitations” were most central. These findings were discussed within the framework of the BFOE model of SAD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.