{"title":"通过集成辐射和环境驱动因素的机器学习,从瞬时观测中稳健估计每日光合作用","authors":"Yanan Zhou, Xing Li, Jingyu Lin, Xi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Remote sensing (RS) facilitates large-scale estimation of vegetation carbon and water fluxes, yet temporal mismatches persist between its instantaneous observations and the daily flux mean or sum required for ecological modeling. Traditional upscaling methods typically convert instantaneous flux observations to daily values through assuming that diurnal flux patterns are mainly driven by solar radiation, failing to capture real dynamics induced by other environmental factors (e.g., temperature and moisture). This introduces substantial errors, particularly in daily carbon flux estimation. To address this issue, we focus on gross primary production (GPP) and develop a new conversion factor model that integrates solar radiation and other key environmental drivers, enabling robust upscaling from instantaneous to daily scales. Using the FLUXNET2015 dataset, the conversion factor <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, defined as the ratio of instantaneous to daily GPP, was modeled using random forest, with vapor pressure deficit, soil water content, air temperature, and shortwave radiation as predictors. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to evaluate predictors’ contribution and response mechanisms. Results show that the proposed model outperformed traditional upscaling methods in daily GPP estimation, improving R² by up to 39% and reducing RMSE by up to 82%. Validation across diverse ecosystems, environmental stress levels, and drought conditions further confirmed its superior generalizability over conventional methods. Critically, <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> retained high accuracy when driven by ERA5-Land reanalysis data instead of site-level tower measurements and reliably upscaled satellite-based instantaneous GPP snapshots to daily estimates, demonstrating scalability for large-scale applications. Moreover, <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> effectively captured complex diurnal dynamics of vegetation photosynthesis under environmental stress, and through SHAP, revealed the growing role of water or temperature-related drivers in regulating GPP diurnal patterns as stress intensified. Overall, this study presents a structurally simple yet ecologically grounded solution to the temporal mismatch in RS-based GPP estimation, and offers valuable insights for upscaling other ecosystem fluxes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 111064"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust estimation of daily photosynthesis from instantaneous observations through machine-learning integration of radiation and environmental drivers\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Zhou, Xing Li, Jingyu Lin, Xi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2026.111064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Remote sensing (RS) facilitates large-scale estimation of vegetation carbon and water fluxes, yet temporal mismatches persist between its instantaneous observations and the daily flux mean or sum required for ecological modeling. Traditional upscaling methods typically convert instantaneous flux observations to daily values through assuming that diurnal flux patterns are mainly driven by solar radiation, failing to capture real dynamics induced by other environmental factors (e.g., temperature and moisture). This introduces substantial errors, particularly in daily carbon flux estimation. To address this issue, we focus on gross primary production (GPP) and develop a new conversion factor model that integrates solar radiation and other key environmental drivers, enabling robust upscaling from instantaneous to daily scales. Using the FLUXNET2015 dataset, the conversion factor <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, defined as the ratio of instantaneous to daily GPP, was modeled using random forest, with vapor pressure deficit, soil water content, air temperature, and shortwave radiation as predictors. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to evaluate predictors’ contribution and response mechanisms. Results show that the proposed model outperformed traditional upscaling methods in daily GPP estimation, improving R² by up to 39% and reducing RMSE by up to 82%. Validation across diverse ecosystems, environmental stress levels, and drought conditions further confirmed its superior generalizability over conventional methods. Critically, <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> retained high accuracy when driven by ERA5-Land reanalysis data instead of site-level tower measurements and reliably upscaled satellite-based instantaneous GPP snapshots to daily estimates, demonstrating scalability for large-scale applications. Moreover, <span><math><msub><mi>γ</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>v</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> effectively captured complex diurnal dynamics of vegetation photosynthesis under environmental stress, and through SHAP, revealed the growing role of water or temperature-related drivers in regulating GPP diurnal patterns as stress intensified. Overall, this study presents a structurally simple yet ecologically grounded solution to the temporal mismatch in RS-based GPP estimation, and offers valuable insights for upscaling other ecosystem fluxes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"380 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192326000493\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192326000493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robust estimation of daily photosynthesis from instantaneous observations through machine-learning integration of radiation and environmental drivers
Remote sensing (RS) facilitates large-scale estimation of vegetation carbon and water fluxes, yet temporal mismatches persist between its instantaneous observations and the daily flux mean or sum required for ecological modeling. Traditional upscaling methods typically convert instantaneous flux observations to daily values through assuming that diurnal flux patterns are mainly driven by solar radiation, failing to capture real dynamics induced by other environmental factors (e.g., temperature and moisture). This introduces substantial errors, particularly in daily carbon flux estimation. To address this issue, we focus on gross primary production (GPP) and develop a new conversion factor model that integrates solar radiation and other key environmental drivers, enabling robust upscaling from instantaneous to daily scales. Using the FLUXNET2015 dataset, the conversion factor , defined as the ratio of instantaneous to daily GPP, was modeled using random forest, with vapor pressure deficit, soil water content, air temperature, and shortwave radiation as predictors. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to evaluate predictors’ contribution and response mechanisms. Results show that the proposed model outperformed traditional upscaling methods in daily GPP estimation, improving R² by up to 39% and reducing RMSE by up to 82%. Validation across diverse ecosystems, environmental stress levels, and drought conditions further confirmed its superior generalizability over conventional methods. Critically, retained high accuracy when driven by ERA5-Land reanalysis data instead of site-level tower measurements and reliably upscaled satellite-based instantaneous GPP snapshots to daily estimates, demonstrating scalability for large-scale applications. Moreover, effectively captured complex diurnal dynamics of vegetation photosynthesis under environmental stress, and through SHAP, revealed the growing role of water or temperature-related drivers in regulating GPP diurnal patterns as stress intensified. Overall, this study presents a structurally simple yet ecologically grounded solution to the temporal mismatch in RS-based GPP estimation, and offers valuable insights for upscaling other ecosystem fluxes.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.