美国胸科医师学会肺切除手术算法:现实验证。

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonology Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-09 DOI:10.1080/25310429.2026.2625574
Luis Puente-Maestu, Paola Benedetti, Julia Garcia de Pedro, Javier García, Christian Castro, Ignacio Garutti, Carlos Simon
{"title":"美国胸科医师学会肺切除手术算法:现实验证。","authors":"Luis Puente-Maestu, Paola Benedetti, Julia Garcia de Pedro, Javier García, Christian Castro, Ignacio Garutti, Carlos Simon","doi":"10.1080/25310429.2026.2625574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The preoperative evaluation of candidates for resective surgery has been addressed in several guidelines, the most recent is the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) algorithm; however, validating information in routine clinical practice is scant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study based on an ongoing registry of candidates for thoracic surgery that began in 2011; therefore, relevant data were prospectively collected. This study is based on patients who operated from January 2011 to 16 December 2023. The last survival update was done on 16 March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, postoperative mortality increased from 3.1% at 30 days to 5.5% at 90 days. Factors associated with mortality included age, predicted-postoperative (PPO) FEV<sub>1</sub>, PPO-DLco, intermediate ACCP risk and pneumonectomy. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) reduced risk. When adjusted for covariates, independent risk factors were age, ACCP intermediate risk and pneumonectomy. Thirty-day mortality: age >70 years OR = 7.5 (95% CI 2.1-26.6), ACCP intermediate risk = 5.6 (1.2-25.8) and pneumonectomy = 6.5 (1.7-24.8); 60-day mortality: age >70 = 10.5 (3.0-37.1), ACCP intermediate risk = 4.5 (1.22-16.33) and pneumonectomy = 8.2 (2.2-29.3); 90-day mortality, age >70 = 6.5 (1.1-24.8), ACCP intermediate risk = 8.2 (2.3-29.26), pneumonectomy = 8.1 (2.78-24.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACCP algorithm remains a valid tool for the assessment of fitness for anatomical lung resection. Our data support some reworking of the algorithm (i.e. considering age >70 years and pneumonectomy in the decision algorithm as intermediate-risk determinants). Mortality continues to increase from 30 to 90 days with higher risk, and this should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis of therapeutic alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"32 1","pages":"2625574"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American College of Chest Physicians algorithm for lung resective surgery: Real-life validation.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Puente-Maestu, Paola Benedetti, Julia Garcia de Pedro, Javier García, Christian Castro, Ignacio Garutti, Carlos Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25310429.2026.2625574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The preoperative evaluation of candidates for resective surgery has been addressed in several guidelines, the most recent is the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) algorithm; however, validating information in routine clinical practice is scant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study based on an ongoing registry of candidates for thoracic surgery that began in 2011; therefore, relevant data were prospectively collected. This study is based on patients who operated from January 2011 to 16 December 2023. The last survival update was done on 16 March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, postoperative mortality increased from 3.1% at 30 days to 5.5% at 90 days. Factors associated with mortality included age, predicted-postoperative (PPO) FEV<sub>1</sub>, PPO-DLco, intermediate ACCP risk and pneumonectomy. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) reduced risk. When adjusted for covariates, independent risk factors were age, ACCP intermediate risk and pneumonectomy. Thirty-day mortality: age >70 years OR = 7.5 (95% CI 2.1-26.6), ACCP intermediate risk = 5.6 (1.2-25.8) and pneumonectomy = 6.5 (1.7-24.8); 60-day mortality: age >70 = 10.5 (3.0-37.1), ACCP intermediate risk = 4.5 (1.22-16.33) and pneumonectomy = 8.2 (2.2-29.3); 90-day mortality, age >70 = 6.5 (1.1-24.8), ACCP intermediate risk = 8.2 (2.3-29.26), pneumonectomy = 8.1 (2.78-24.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACCP algorithm remains a valid tool for the assessment of fitness for anatomical lung resection. Our data support some reworking of the algorithm (i.e. considering age >70 years and pneumonectomy in the decision algorithm as intermediate-risk determinants). Mortality continues to increase from 30 to 90 days with higher risk, and this should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis of therapeutic alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"2625574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2026.2625574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25310429.2026.2625574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:切除手术候选人的术前评估已经在几个指南中得到解决,最近的是美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)算法;然而,在常规临床实践中验证的信息是缺乏的。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,基于2011年开始进行的胸外科候选人注册;因此,我们前瞻性地收集了相关资料。本研究基于2011年1月至2023年12月16日手术的患者。最后一次生存更新是在2024年3月16日完成的。结果:总体而言,术后死亡率从30天的3.1%上升到90天的5.5%。与死亡率相关的因素包括年龄、预测术后(PPO) FEV1、PPO- dlco、中度ACCP风险和全肺切除术。视频辅助胸外科手术(VATS)降低了风险。校正协变量后,独立危险因素为年龄、ACCP中度危险和全肺切除术。30天死亡率:年龄bb0 ~ 70岁OR = 7.5 (95% CI 2.1 ~ 26.6), ACCP中危= 5.6(1.2 ~ 25.8),全肺切除术= 6.5 (1.7 ~ 24.8);60天死亡率:年龄bbb70 = 10.5 (3.0-37.1), ACCP中危= 4.5(1.22-16.33),全肺切除术= 8.2 (2.2-29.3);90天死亡率,年龄bbb70 = 6.5 (1.1 ~ 24.8), ACCP中危= 8.2(2.3 ~ 29.26),全肺切除= 8.1(2.78 ~ 24.3)。结论:ACCP算法仍然是评估解剖肺切除术适应度的有效工具。我们的数据支持对算法进行一些修改(即将决策算法中的年龄和肺切除术考虑为中等风险决定因素)。死亡率从30天到90天继续增加,风险更高,这应在治疗替代方案的风险/效益分析中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
American College of Chest Physicians algorithm for lung resective surgery: Real-life validation.

Rationale: The preoperative evaluation of candidates for resective surgery has been addressed in several guidelines, the most recent is the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) algorithm; however, validating information in routine clinical practice is scant.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study based on an ongoing registry of candidates for thoracic surgery that began in 2011; therefore, relevant data were prospectively collected. This study is based on patients who operated from January 2011 to 16 December 2023. The last survival update was done on 16 March 2024.

Results: Overall, postoperative mortality increased from 3.1% at 30 days to 5.5% at 90 days. Factors associated with mortality included age, predicted-postoperative (PPO) FEV1, PPO-DLco, intermediate ACCP risk and pneumonectomy. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) reduced risk. When adjusted for covariates, independent risk factors were age, ACCP intermediate risk and pneumonectomy. Thirty-day mortality: age >70 years OR = 7.5 (95% CI 2.1-26.6), ACCP intermediate risk = 5.6 (1.2-25.8) and pneumonectomy = 6.5 (1.7-24.8); 60-day mortality: age >70 = 10.5 (3.0-37.1), ACCP intermediate risk = 4.5 (1.22-16.33) and pneumonectomy = 8.2 (2.2-29.3); 90-day mortality, age >70 = 6.5 (1.1-24.8), ACCP intermediate risk = 8.2 (2.3-29.26), pneumonectomy = 8.1 (2.78-24.3).

Conclusions: The ACCP algorithm remains a valid tool for the assessment of fitness for anatomical lung resection. Our data support some reworking of the algorithm (i.e. considering age >70 years and pneumonectomy in the decision algorithm as intermediate-risk determinants). Mortality continues to increase from 30 to 90 days with higher risk, and this should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis of therapeutic alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书