用药错误报告与分析:沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院推进用药安全实践的比较研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saleh A Alghamdi
{"title":"用药错误报告与分析:沙特阿拉伯卫生部医院推进用药安全实践的比较研究。","authors":"Saleh A Alghamdi","doi":"10.15537/smj.2026.47.1.20250755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze and compare these stages, types, frequency, causes, and corrective actions related to medication errors (MEs) reported in Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia, and thereby enhance medication safety through data driven decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using ME reports submitted to the Saudi MOH national reporting system from January 2023 to December 2024.Data were collected from nine hospitals, covering medication involved, reporting personnel, level of harm and corrective actions. A novel stratification framework (NSF) was used to visualize emerging risks and protective trends. Statistical analyses were conducted using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), Cohen's [h], Pearson's Chi-square test, and Z-adjusted column proportion comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 19,645 MEs was analyzed with almost equal gender proportions (<i>p</i> = 0.976). MEs reporting remained stable in hospitals between years, while a few showed an upward trend (<i>p</i> < 10<sup>-111</sup>). Most of the reported errors (69.1%) were intercepted before reaching the patients with no harmful effects. Prescribing (94.8%) with wrong or missed dose (18.6%) remained the leading cause. Pharmacists were at the forefront of reporting these cases (>90%). Improved documentation (<i>p</i> < 10<sup>-300</sup>) and enhanced physician involvement were also observed in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of continuous evaluation and rigorous analysis of MEs data and the design of novel quantifiable tools for benchmarking safety and guiding targeted interventions in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"102-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication Errors Reporting and Analysis: <i>A Comparative Study for Advancing Medication Safety Practices in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Saleh A Alghamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.15537/smj.2026.47.1.20250755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze and compare these stages, types, frequency, causes, and corrective actions related to medication errors (MEs) reported in Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia, and thereby enhance medication safety through data driven decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using ME reports submitted to the Saudi MOH national reporting system from January 2023 to December 2024.Data were collected from nine hospitals, covering medication involved, reporting personnel, level of harm and corrective actions. A novel stratification framework (NSF) was used to visualize emerging risks and protective trends. Statistical analyses were conducted using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), Cohen's [h], Pearson's Chi-square test, and Z-adjusted column proportion comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 19,645 MEs was analyzed with almost equal gender proportions (<i>p</i> = 0.976). MEs reporting remained stable in hospitals between years, while a few showed an upward trend (<i>p</i> < 10<sup>-111</sup>). Most of the reported errors (69.1%) were intercepted before reaching the patients with no harmful effects. Prescribing (94.8%) with wrong or missed dose (18.6%) remained the leading cause. Pharmacists were at the forefront of reporting these cases (>90%). Improved documentation (<i>p</i> < 10<sup>-300</sup>) and enhanced physician involvement were also observed in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of continuous evaluation and rigorous analysis of MEs data and the design of novel quantifiable tools for benchmarking safety and guiding targeted interventions in healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"102-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2026.47.1.20250755\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2026.47.1.20250755","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析和比较沙特阿拉伯卫生部(MOH)医院报告的与用药错误(MEs)相关的阶段、类型、频率、原因和纠正措施,从而通过数据驱动的决策提高用药安全性。方法:对2023年1月至2024年12月提交给沙特卫生部国家报告系统的ME报告进行回顾性横断面研究。从9家医院收集数据,包括涉及的药物、报告人员、伤害程度和纠正措施。一种新的分层框架(NSF)被用于可视化新出现的风险和保护趋势。采用相对危险度(RR)、风险差(RD)、Cohen’s [h]、Pearson’s卡方检验和z校正列比例比较进行统计学分析。结果:19645名MEs样本的性别比例基本相等(p = 0.976)。各年医院的MEs报告保持稳定,而少数医院呈上升趋势(p < 10-111)。大多数报告的错误(69.1%)在到达患者之前被拦截,没有造成不良影响。处方错误或漏给剂量(18.6%)仍是主要原因。药剂师是报告这些病例的最前线(60% - 90%)。在本研究中还观察到改进的文献记录(p < 10-300)和增强的医生参与。结论:研究结果强调了持续评估和严格分析MEs数据以及设计新的可量化工具的重要性,这些工具可以对医疗保健环境中的安全性进行基准测试,并指导有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Medication Errors Reporting and Analysis: <i>A Comparative Study for Advancing Medication Safety Practices in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia</i>.

Medication Errors Reporting and Analysis: A Comparative Study for Advancing Medication Safety Practices in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Objectives: To analyze and compare these stages, types, frequency, causes, and corrective actions related to medication errors (MEs) reported in Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals in Saudi Arabia, and thereby enhance medication safety through data driven decisions.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using ME reports submitted to the Saudi MOH national reporting system from January 2023 to December 2024.Data were collected from nine hospitals, covering medication involved, reporting personnel, level of harm and corrective actions. A novel stratification framework (NSF) was used to visualize emerging risks and protective trends. Statistical analyses were conducted using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), Cohen's [h], Pearson's Chi-square test, and Z-adjusted column proportion comparisons.

Results: A sample of 19,645 MEs was analyzed with almost equal gender proportions (p = 0.976). MEs reporting remained stable in hospitals between years, while a few showed an upward trend (p < 10-111). Most of the reported errors (69.1%) were intercepted before reaching the patients with no harmful effects. Prescribing (94.8%) with wrong or missed dose (18.6%) remained the leading cause. Pharmacists were at the forefront of reporting these cases (>90%). Improved documentation (p < 10-300) and enhanced physician involvement were also observed in this study.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of continuous evaluation and rigorous analysis of MEs data and the design of novel quantifiable tools for benchmarking safety and guiding targeted interventions in healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书