TBM运行参数一维估计的可靠性分析

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Underground Space Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.undsp.2025.10.004
Oveis Farzay, Marilena Cardu
{"title":"TBM运行参数一维估计的可靠性分析","authors":"Oveis Farzay,&nbsp;Marilena Cardu","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate TBM performance estimation is essential for effective tunnel design and planning. This study introduces a one-dimensional (1D) estimation model that estimates thrust, torque, power, cutterhead speed, and tool count using only excavation diameter. The model was developed across four TBM types—open, single shield (SS), double shield (DS), and earth pressure balance (EPB)—to isolate the influence of diameter from other variables. Validation against existing models and a 52-case independent dataset confirmed strong correlations: torque scales with the cube of the excavation diameter (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.89 for EPB), power grows faster than linearly (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.83 for EPB), thrust increases supra-linearly (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.79 for EPB), and cutterhead speed decreases with diameter (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.87 for open TBM). Tool count grows proportionally. A reliability matrix compares model accuracy and data support, aiding selection based on both fitness and robustness. This 1D model offers fast, consistent estimates for early-stage assessments. While it excludes detailed geological input, it is suited for feasibility studies and preliminary design. Future work will incorporate additional ground and machine parameters and extend validation across a broader range of tunneling conditions to enhance generalizability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 72-91"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability analysis of 1D estimation for TBM operational parameters\",\"authors\":\"Oveis Farzay,&nbsp;Marilena Cardu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2025.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate TBM performance estimation is essential for effective tunnel design and planning. This study introduces a one-dimensional (1D) estimation model that estimates thrust, torque, power, cutterhead speed, and tool count using only excavation diameter. The model was developed across four TBM types—open, single shield (SS), double shield (DS), and earth pressure balance (EPB)—to isolate the influence of diameter from other variables. Validation against existing models and a 52-case independent dataset confirmed strong correlations: torque scales with the cube of the excavation diameter (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.89 for EPB), power grows faster than linearly (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.83 for EPB), thrust increases supra-linearly (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.79 for EPB), and cutterhead speed decreases with diameter (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.87 for open TBM). Tool count grows proportionally. A reliability matrix compares model accuracy and data support, aiding selection based on both fitness and robustness. This 1D model offers fast, consistent estimates for early-stage assessments. While it excludes detailed geological input, it is suited for feasibility studies and preliminary design. Future work will incorporate additional ground and machine parameters and extend validation across a broader range of tunneling conditions to enhance generalizability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425001394\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425001394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的隧道掘进机性能评估对有效的隧道设计和规划至关重要。本研究引入了一维(1D)估算模型,该模型仅使用开挖直径估算推力、扭矩、功率、刀盘速度和刀具数量。该模型建立在四种掘进机类型(开式、单盾构(SS)、双盾构(DS)和土压平衡(EPB))上,以隔离直径对其他变量的影响。对现有模型和52例独立数据集的验证证实了强相关性:扭矩与开挖直径的立方呈正相关(对于EPB, R2 = 0.89),功率增长快于线性(对于EPB, R2 = 0.83),推力增加超线性(对于EPB, R2 = 0.79),刀盘速度随直径减小(对于开式TBM, R2 = 0.87)。工具数量按比例增长。可靠性矩阵比较模型的准确性和数据支持度,帮助基于适应度和鲁棒性的选择。这种一维模型为早期评估提供了快速、一致的估计。虽然它不包括详细的地质输入,但它适合于可行性研究和初步设计。未来的工作将纳入更多的地面和机器参数,并在更广泛的隧道条件下扩展验证,以提高通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability analysis of 1D estimation for TBM operational parameters
Accurate TBM performance estimation is essential for effective tunnel design and planning. This study introduces a one-dimensional (1D) estimation model that estimates thrust, torque, power, cutterhead speed, and tool count using only excavation diameter. The model was developed across four TBM types—open, single shield (SS), double shield (DS), and earth pressure balance (EPB)—to isolate the influence of diameter from other variables. Validation against existing models and a 52-case independent dataset confirmed strong correlations: torque scales with the cube of the excavation diameter (R2 = 0.89 for EPB), power grows faster than linearly (R2 = 0.83 for EPB), thrust increases supra-linearly (R2 = 0.79 for EPB), and cutterhead speed decreases with diameter (R2 = 0.87 for open TBM). Tool count grows proportionally. A reliability matrix compares model accuracy and data support, aiding selection based on both fitness and robustness. This 1D model offers fast, consistent estimates for early-stage assessments. While it excludes detailed geological input, it is suited for feasibility studies and preliminary design. Future work will incorporate additional ground and machine parameters and extend validation across a broader range of tunneling conditions to enhance generalizability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Underground Space
Underground Space ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书