预防新生儿败血症的疫苗:重点关注B群链球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌,以应对日益严重的抗菌素耐药性。

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2026.2622690
Francesca Micoli, Simona Rondini, Francesco Berlanda Scorza, Roberto Adamo
{"title":"预防新生儿败血症的疫苗:重点关注B群链球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌,以应对日益严重的抗菌素耐药性。","authors":"Francesca Micoli, Simona Rondini, Francesco Berlanda Scorza, Roberto Adamo","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2026.2622690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal sepsis, a systemic infection occurring in infants within their first 28 days of life, is a leading cause of mortality globally. The burden is especially severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where incidence and mortality rates are higher than in high-resource settings. Antimicrobial resistance, driven by multidrug-resistant pathogens prevalent in LMICs, further complicates its effective management. Vaccination offers a promising strategy to prevent infections caused by common neonatal sepsis pathogens, potentially reducing sepsis incidence and mitigating resistance.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>This review examines the burden of bacterial pathogens, specifically Group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i>, responsible for neonatal sepsis, drawing from a comprehensive literature search focusing on the last ten years across major databases. It provides an overview of vaccine candidates in clinical development, highlights innovative approaches in preclinical research, and discusses the key challenges associated with vaccine strategies preventing neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Given the multivalency of vaccines for neonatal sepsis, innovative technologies are under investigation. Defining correlate of protections has been critical for GBS vaccine development, and may pave the way for vaccines against <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>E. coli</i>. Novel regulatory and clinical strategies, including disease-based rather than pathogen-specific approaches, should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"2622690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccines preventing neonatal sepsis: focus on Group B <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> to combat rising antimicrobial resistance.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Micoli, Simona Rondini, Francesco Berlanda Scorza, Roberto Adamo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14760584.2026.2622690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal sepsis, a systemic infection occurring in infants within their first 28 days of life, is a leading cause of mortality globally. The burden is especially severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where incidence and mortality rates are higher than in high-resource settings. Antimicrobial resistance, driven by multidrug-resistant pathogens prevalent in LMICs, further complicates its effective management. Vaccination offers a promising strategy to prevent infections caused by common neonatal sepsis pathogens, potentially reducing sepsis incidence and mitigating resistance.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>This review examines the burden of bacterial pathogens, specifically Group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS), <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i>, responsible for neonatal sepsis, drawing from a comprehensive literature search focusing on the last ten years across major databases. It provides an overview of vaccine candidates in clinical development, highlights innovative approaches in preclinical research, and discusses the key challenges associated with vaccine strategies preventing neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Given the multivalency of vaccines for neonatal sepsis, innovative technologies are under investigation. Defining correlate of protections has been critical for GBS vaccine development, and may pave the way for vaccines against <i>K. pneumoniae</i> and <i>E. coli</i>. Novel regulatory and clinical strategies, including disease-based rather than pathogen-specific approaches, should be explored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2622690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2622690\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2026.2622690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新生儿败血症是一种发生在婴儿出生后28天内的全身性感染,是全球死亡的主要原因。这种负担在低收入和中等收入国家尤其严重,这些国家的发病率和死亡率高于资源丰富的国家。由中低收入国家普遍存在的耐多药病原体驱动的抗微生物药物耐药性进一步使其有效管理复杂化。疫苗接种为预防常见新生儿败血症病原体引起的感染提供了一种有希望的策略,有可能减少败血症的发生率并减轻耐药性。涵盖领域:本综述研究了细菌性病原体的负担,特别是B族链球菌(GBS),肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌,负责新生儿败血症,从主要数据库中近十年的综合文献检索中得出。它概述了临床开发中的候选疫苗,重点介绍了临床前研究中的创新方法,并讨论了与预防新生儿败血症的疫苗策略相关的关键挑战。专家意见:鉴于新生儿败血症疫苗的多价性,正在研究创新技术。确定保护的相关性对GBS疫苗的开发至关重要,并可能为针对肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌的疫苗铺平道路。应该探索新的管理和临床策略,包括基于疾病而不是针对病原体的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccines preventing neonatal sepsis: focus on Group B Streptococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli to combat rising antimicrobial resistance.

Introduction: Neonatal sepsis, a systemic infection occurring in infants within their first 28 days of life, is a leading cause of mortality globally. The burden is especially severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where incidence and mortality rates are higher than in high-resource settings. Antimicrobial resistance, driven by multidrug-resistant pathogens prevalent in LMICs, further complicates its effective management. Vaccination offers a promising strategy to prevent infections caused by common neonatal sepsis pathogens, potentially reducing sepsis incidence and mitigating resistance.

Area covered: This review examines the burden of bacterial pathogens, specifically Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli, responsible for neonatal sepsis, drawing from a comprehensive literature search focusing on the last ten years across major databases. It provides an overview of vaccine candidates in clinical development, highlights innovative approaches in preclinical research, and discusses the key challenges associated with vaccine strategies preventing neonatal sepsis.

Expert opinion: Given the multivalency of vaccines for neonatal sepsis, innovative technologies are under investigation. Defining correlate of protections has been critical for GBS vaccine development, and may pave the way for vaccines against K. pneumoniae and E. coli. Novel regulatory and clinical strategies, including disease-based rather than pathogen-specific approaches, should be explored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书