在有和没有双重任务的计时起跑测试中,转弯时间和步长参数能区分不同认知能力的个体吗?探索性研究。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Niklas Löfgren, Lars Berglund, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Erik Rosendahl, Anna Cristina Åberg
{"title":"在有和没有双重任务的计时起跑测试中,转弯时间和步长参数能区分不同认知能力的个体吗?探索性研究。","authors":"Niklas Löfgren, Lars Berglund, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Erik Rosendahl, Anna Cristina Åberg","doi":"10.1177/10731911251410337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore if turn duration and the performance of step parameters during segments of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with and without cognitive dual-tasking (TUGdt) can discriminate between individuals with different cognitive ability. Participants were divided into groups (dementia = 57, mild cognitive impairment = 126, subjective cognitive impairment = 71, and controls = 50) and performed TUG and TUGdt (naming animals and reciting months in reverse order, respectively). Turn duration and <i>forward</i> and <i>return walk (step parameters)</i> were compared between adjacent groups for all conditions. Results were analyzed with logistic regression models, presented with standardized odds ratios, and generally showed longer turn duration during TUGdt for groups with lower levels of cognitive ability, whereas a small tendency was observed for step length/body height. While these results need to be confirmed, they may indicate the potential of assessing TUG segments, particularly turn duration, to identify risk of cognitive impairment.Trial registration numberNCT05893524.</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911251410337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Turn Duration and Step Parameters During the Timed Up and Go Test With and Without a Dual-Task Discriminate Between Individuals With Different Cognitive Abilities? An Explorative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Löfgren, Lars Berglund, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Erik Rosendahl, Anna Cristina Åberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911251410337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore if turn duration and the performance of step parameters during segments of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with and without cognitive dual-tasking (TUGdt) can discriminate between individuals with different cognitive ability. Participants were divided into groups (dementia = 57, mild cognitive impairment = 126, subjective cognitive impairment = 71, and controls = 50) and performed TUG and TUGdt (naming animals and reciting months in reverse order, respectively). Turn duration and <i>forward</i> and <i>return walk (step parameters)</i> were compared between adjacent groups for all conditions. Results were analyzed with logistic regression models, presented with standardized odds ratios, and generally showed longer turn duration during TUGdt for groups with lower levels of cognitive ability, whereas a small tendency was observed for step length/body height. While these results need to be confirmed, they may indicate the potential of assessing TUG segments, particularly turn duration, to identify risk of cognitive impairment.Trial registration numberNCT05893524.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911251410337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251410337\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251410337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨在有和没有认知双重任务(TUGdt)的情况下,转弯时间和步骤参数的表现是否可以区分不同认知能力的个体。参与者被分成小组(痴呆= 57人,轻度认知障碍= 126人,主观认知障碍= 71人,对照组= 50人),并进行TUG和TUGdt(分别按倒序命名动物和背诵月份)。在所有条件下,比较相邻组之间的转弯时间和前进和返回行走(步参数)。结果采用logistic回归模型进行分析,采用标准化的优势比,结果表明认知能力水平较低的组在TUGdt期间的转身时间更长,而步长/身高的趋势较小。虽然这些结果有待证实,但它们可能表明评估TUG节段,特别是转弯持续时间,以识别认知障碍风险的潜力。试验注册号:bernct05893524。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Turn Duration and Step Parameters During the Timed Up and Go Test With and Without a Dual-Task Discriminate Between Individuals With Different Cognitive Abilities? An Explorative Study.

The aim of this study was to explore if turn duration and the performance of step parameters during segments of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test with and without cognitive dual-tasking (TUGdt) can discriminate between individuals with different cognitive ability. Participants were divided into groups (dementia = 57, mild cognitive impairment = 126, subjective cognitive impairment = 71, and controls = 50) and performed TUG and TUGdt (naming animals and reciting months in reverse order, respectively). Turn duration and forward and return walk (step parameters) were compared between adjacent groups for all conditions. Results were analyzed with logistic regression models, presented with standardized odds ratios, and generally showed longer turn duration during TUGdt for groups with lower levels of cognitive ability, whereas a small tendency was observed for step length/body height. While these results need to be confirmed, they may indicate the potential of assessing TUG segments, particularly turn duration, to identify risk of cognitive impairment.Trial registration numberNCT05893524.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书