{"title":"欧盟碳排放交易体系下的碳农业市场连通性:部门异质性和市场状态的证据","authors":"Kejia Yan , Boqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the dynamic connectedness structure between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and agricultural commodity futures, with the aim of assessing how climate policy–related unintended economic impacts may be reflected across different agricultural sectors and market states. Rather than focusing on causal transmission, the analysis adopts a connectedness-based monitoring perspective, using futures markets as forward-looking indicators of evolving cost pressures and market sensitivities associated with climate policy implementation. Using daily data spanning all four trading phases of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) from 2007 to 2024, we document pronounced sectoral heterogeneity and state dependence in carbon–agriculture market linkages. Grain futures consistently exhibit directional dominance in their bilateral connectedness with EUA futures across market conditions, indicating strong structural resilience in staple food markets. In contrast, non-grain agricultural futures display greater heterogeneity, with their directional exposure to carbon market dynamics becoming more pronounced in later trading phases and under specific quantile conditions. These findings suggest that climate policy–related unintended economic impacts are unlikely to manifest uniformly across food systems, but may emerge more selectively along specific segments of the agricultural value chain and under particular market states. By highlighting where and when such sensitivities become more visible within market interactions, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the broader economic implications of climate policy implementation, while offering a policy-relevant diagnostic framework that complements traditional price- or outcome-based evaluations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 109160"},"PeriodicalIF":13.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon–agriculture market connectedness under the EU ETS: Evidence on sectoral heterogeneity and market states\",\"authors\":\"Kejia Yan , Boqiang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the dynamic connectedness structure between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and agricultural commodity futures, with the aim of assessing how climate policy–related unintended economic impacts may be reflected across different agricultural sectors and market states. Rather than focusing on causal transmission, the analysis adopts a connectedness-based monitoring perspective, using futures markets as forward-looking indicators of evolving cost pressures and market sensitivities associated with climate policy implementation. Using daily data spanning all four trading phases of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) from 2007 to 2024, we document pronounced sectoral heterogeneity and state dependence in carbon–agriculture market linkages. Grain futures consistently exhibit directional dominance in their bilateral connectedness with EUA futures across market conditions, indicating strong structural resilience in staple food markets. In contrast, non-grain agricultural futures display greater heterogeneity, with their directional exposure to carbon market dynamics becoming more pronounced in later trading phases and under specific quantile conditions. These findings suggest that climate policy–related unintended economic impacts are unlikely to manifest uniformly across food systems, but may emerge more selectively along specific segments of the agricultural value chain and under particular market states. By highlighting where and when such sensitivities become more visible within market interactions, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the broader economic implications of climate policy implementation, while offering a policy-relevant diagnostic framework that complements traditional price- or outcome-based evaluations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326000393\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988326000393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbon–agriculture market connectedness under the EU ETS: Evidence on sectoral heterogeneity and market states
This study examines the dynamic connectedness structure between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and agricultural commodity futures, with the aim of assessing how climate policy–related unintended economic impacts may be reflected across different agricultural sectors and market states. Rather than focusing on causal transmission, the analysis adopts a connectedness-based monitoring perspective, using futures markets as forward-looking indicators of evolving cost pressures and market sensitivities associated with climate policy implementation. Using daily data spanning all four trading phases of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) from 2007 to 2024, we document pronounced sectoral heterogeneity and state dependence in carbon–agriculture market linkages. Grain futures consistently exhibit directional dominance in their bilateral connectedness with EUA futures across market conditions, indicating strong structural resilience in staple food markets. In contrast, non-grain agricultural futures display greater heterogeneity, with their directional exposure to carbon market dynamics becoming more pronounced in later trading phases and under specific quantile conditions. These findings suggest that climate policy–related unintended economic impacts are unlikely to manifest uniformly across food systems, but may emerge more selectively along specific segments of the agricultural value chain and under particular market states. By highlighting where and when such sensitivities become more visible within market interactions, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the broader economic implications of climate policy implementation, while offering a policy-relevant diagnostic framework that complements traditional price- or outcome-based evaluations.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.