用一种新型稳定校准器评价血清游离Kappa轻链参考区间。

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Derek Waggoner, Katie Thoren, Robert Maynard, Kwaku Twum, Nichole Korpi-Steiner
{"title":"用一种新型稳定校准器评价血清游离Kappa轻链参考区间。","authors":"Derek Waggoner, Katie Thoren, Robert Maynard, Kwaku Twum, Nichole Korpi-Steiner","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement of serum free light chains (FLC) including kappa FLC, lambda FLC, and calculated kappa to lambda FLC ratio play a vital role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of plasma cell disorders. Recent concerns regarding upward drift in The Binding Site's kappa FLC measurements have prompted a reformulation of the kappa FLC calibrator by the manufacturer. This study aims to assess the impact of the reformulated/new kappa FLC calibrator on both the kappa FLC reference interval (RI) and the FLC ratio diagnostic range.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers (n = 124) from 3 tertiary care medical centers had FLCs measured using both the new and the prior lot of kappa FLC calibrators on an Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site). All samples were screened for monoclonal proteins using capillary electrophoresis. Creatinine was measured to confirm renal function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of kappa FLC values from the new vs prior calibrator demonstrated minimal differences. Neither calibrator was able to verify manufacturer-suggested RI in our study population. The proportion of samples that had FLC ratios within the manufacturer's claimed diagnostic range was equivalent between calibrators, with roughly 6% to 7% of study participants falling above the diagnostic range of 0.26 to 1.65.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new reformulated kappa FLC calibrator from The Binding Site does not support verification of the manufacturer's claimed kappa FLC RI or improve the number of healthy patients falling within the FLC ratio diagnostic range. Both the kappa FLC RI and diagnostic range for FLC ratio should be reevaluated and updated in consensus guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"599-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Reference Interval Using a New Stabilized Calibrator.\",\"authors\":\"Derek Waggoner, Katie Thoren, Robert Maynard, Kwaku Twum, Nichole Korpi-Steiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfaf208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measurement of serum free light chains (FLC) including kappa FLC, lambda FLC, and calculated kappa to lambda FLC ratio play a vital role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of plasma cell disorders. Recent concerns regarding upward drift in The Binding Site's kappa FLC measurements have prompted a reformulation of the kappa FLC calibrator by the manufacturer. This study aims to assess the impact of the reformulated/new kappa FLC calibrator on both the kappa FLC reference interval (RI) and the FLC ratio diagnostic range.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy volunteers (n = 124) from 3 tertiary care medical centers had FLCs measured using both the new and the prior lot of kappa FLC calibrators on an Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site). All samples were screened for monoclonal proteins using capillary electrophoresis. Creatinine was measured to confirm renal function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of kappa FLC values from the new vs prior calibrator demonstrated minimal differences. Neither calibrator was able to verify manufacturer-suggested RI in our study population. The proportion of samples that had FLC ratios within the manufacturer's claimed diagnostic range was equivalent between calibrators, with roughly 6% to 7% of study participants falling above the diagnostic range of 0.26 to 1.65.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new reformulated kappa FLC calibrator from The Binding Site does not support verification of the manufacturer's claimed kappa FLC RI or improve the number of healthy patients falling within the FLC ratio diagnostic range. Both the kappa FLC RI and diagnostic range for FLC ratio should be reevaluated and updated in consensus guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"599-605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血清游离轻链(FLC)的测定包括kappa FLC、lambda FLC以及kappa / lambda FLC比值的计算在浆细胞疾病的诊断、预后和监测中具有重要作用。最近对结合位点kappa FLC测量值向上漂移的担忧促使制造商重新制定了kappa FLC校准器。本研究旨在评估重新配制/新的kappa FLC校准器对kappa FLC参考区间(RI)和FLC比率诊断范围的影响。方法:来自3个三级医疗中心的健康志愿者(n = 124)在Optilite分析仪(the Binding Site)上使用新批和旧批kappa FLC校定器测量FLC。所有样品均采用毛细管电泳法筛选单克隆蛋白。测定肌酐以确认肾功能。结果:新校准器与旧校准器的kappa FLC值比较显示差异极小。在我们的研究人群中,两种校准器都无法验证制造商建议的RI。FLC比率在制造商声称的诊断范围内的样品比例在校校器之间是相等的,大约6%到7%的研究参与者落在0.26到1.65的诊断范围以上。结论:来自The Binding Site的新配方kappa FLC校定仪不支持验证制造商声称的kappa FLC RI或提高处于FLC比率诊断范围内的健康患者的数量。kappa FLC RI和FLC比值的诊断范围都应重新评估并在共识指南中更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Serum Kappa Free Light Chain Reference Interval Using a New Stabilized Calibrator.

Background: Measurement of serum free light chains (FLC) including kappa FLC, lambda FLC, and calculated kappa to lambda FLC ratio play a vital role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of plasma cell disorders. Recent concerns regarding upward drift in The Binding Site's kappa FLC measurements have prompted a reformulation of the kappa FLC calibrator by the manufacturer. This study aims to assess the impact of the reformulated/new kappa FLC calibrator on both the kappa FLC reference interval (RI) and the FLC ratio diagnostic range.

Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 124) from 3 tertiary care medical centers had FLCs measured using both the new and the prior lot of kappa FLC calibrators on an Optilite analyzer (The Binding Site). All samples were screened for monoclonal proteins using capillary electrophoresis. Creatinine was measured to confirm renal function.

Results: Comparison of kappa FLC values from the new vs prior calibrator demonstrated minimal differences. Neither calibrator was able to verify manufacturer-suggested RI in our study population. The proportion of samples that had FLC ratios within the manufacturer's claimed diagnostic range was equivalent between calibrators, with roughly 6% to 7% of study participants falling above the diagnostic range of 0.26 to 1.65.

Conclusion: The new reformulated kappa FLC calibrator from The Binding Site does not support verification of the manufacturer's claimed kappa FLC RI or improve the number of healthy patients falling within the FLC ratio diagnostic range. Both the kappa FLC RI and diagnostic range for FLC ratio should be reevaluated and updated in consensus guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书