原发性痛经妇女内皮功能障碍的评估。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1080/14017431.2026.2613540
Betül Sarıbıyık Çakmak, Ahmet Can Çakmak, Yusuf Can, Harun Kilic
{"title":"原发性痛经妇女内皮功能障碍的评估。","authors":"Betül Sarıbıyık Çakmak, Ahmet Can Çakmak, Yusuf Can, Harun Kilic","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2026.2613540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea is a common condition characterized by cramp-like menstrual pain in young women. Recently, its effects on the cardiovascular system have garnered attention. Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of cardiovascular risk; however, its relationship with primary dysmenorrhea remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate endothelial function in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea using post-ischemic flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and volumetric flow (VolFlow) methods, and to compare the results with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study included 31 women with a clinical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea and 31 healthy control women. Endothelial function was assessed using Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) and VolFlow methods. FMD measures the dilation of the brachial artery, while VolFlow evaluates arterial blood flow volume. Differences between the groups were analyzed using SPSS, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and between-group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The FMD values were significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (5.97 ± 5.29 vs. 10.95 ± 3.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the proportion of individuals with endothelial dysfunction was higher (%51.6 vs. %6.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the dysmenorrhea group, the baseline VolFlow value was 77.4 ± 24.1 ml/min, which increased to 81.4 ± 25.1 ml/min after cuff inflation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In healthy controls, the VolFlow increased from 69.8 ± 15.3 ml/min to 92.0 ± 15.3 ml/min, but this change was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.08). The change in VolFlow (ΔVF) was significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate a significant impairment of endothelial function in the primary dysmenorrhea group compared to the control group. Specifically, individuals with primary dysmenorrhea exhibited lower flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and Δ vascular function (ΔVF) values. To further investigate this relationship, large-scale studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2613540"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of endothelial dysfunction in women with primary dysmenorrhea.\",\"authors\":\"Betül Sarıbıyık Çakmak, Ahmet Can Çakmak, Yusuf Can, Harun Kilic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14017431.2026.2613540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea is a common condition characterized by cramp-like menstrual pain in young women. Recently, its effects on the cardiovascular system have garnered attention. Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of cardiovascular risk; however, its relationship with primary dysmenorrhea remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate endothelial function in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea using post-ischemic flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and volumetric flow (VolFlow) methods, and to compare the results with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study included 31 women with a clinical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea and 31 healthy control women. Endothelial function was assessed using Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) and VolFlow methods. FMD measures the dilation of the brachial artery, while VolFlow evaluates arterial blood flow volume. Differences between the groups were analyzed using SPSS, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and between-group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The FMD values were significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (5.97 ± 5.29 vs. 10.95 ± 3.78, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and the proportion of individuals with endothelial dysfunction was higher (%51.6 vs. %6.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the dysmenorrhea group, the baseline VolFlow value was 77.4 ± 24.1 ml/min, which increased to 81.4 ± 25.1 ml/min after cuff inflation (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In healthy controls, the VolFlow increased from 69.8 ± 15.3 ml/min to 92.0 ± 15.3 ml/min, but this change was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.08). The change in VolFlow (ΔVF) was significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate a significant impairment of endothelial function in the primary dysmenorrhea group compared to the control group. Specifically, individuals with primary dysmenorrhea exhibited lower flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and Δ vascular function (ΔVF) values. To further investigate this relationship, large-scale studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2613540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2026.2613540\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2026.2613540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:原发性痛经是年轻女性以痉挛样月经疼痛为特征的一种常见疾病。最近,它对心血管系统的影响引起了人们的关注。内皮功能障碍是心血管风险的早期指标;然而,其与原发性痛经的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用缺血后血流介导扩张(FMD)和容量血流(VolFlow)方法评估原发性痛经患者的内皮功能,并将结果与健康对照进行比较。设计:本研究包括31名临床诊断为原发性痛经的女性和31名健康对照女性。采用血流介导扩张(FMD)和VolFlow方法评估内皮功能。FMD测量肱动脉的扩张,而VolFlow评估动脉血流量。组间差异采用SPSS分析,p值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估正态性,并使用适当的参数和非参数方法进行组间比较。结果:痛经组FMD值明显低于痛经组(5.97±5.29比10.95±3.78,p < 0.001),内皮功能障碍患者比例高于痛经组(51.6%比6.45,p < 0.001)。痛经组VolFlow基线值为77.4±24.1 ml/min,袖带充气后升高至81.4±25.1 ml/min (p < 0.001)。健康对照组VolFlow由69.8±15.3 ml/min升高至92.0±15.3 ml/min,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.08)。痛经组VolFlow (ΔVF)的变化明显低于痛经组(p < 0.001)。结果:我们的研究结果表明,与对照组相比,原发性痛经组内皮功能明显受损。具体来说,原发性痛经患者表现出较低的血流介导扩张(FMD)和Δ血管功能(ΔVF)值。为了进一步研究这种关系,需要进行大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of endothelial dysfunction in women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Objectives: Primary dysmenorrhea is a common condition characterized by cramp-like menstrual pain in young women. Recently, its effects on the cardiovascular system have garnered attention. Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of cardiovascular risk; however, its relationship with primary dysmenorrhea remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate endothelial function in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea using post-ischemic flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and volumetric flow (VolFlow) methods, and to compare the results with healthy controls.

Design: This study included 31 women with a clinical diagnosis of primary dysmenorrhea and 31 healthy control women. Endothelial function was assessed using Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) and VolFlow methods. FMD measures the dilation of the brachial artery, while VolFlow evaluates arterial blood flow volume. Differences between the groups were analyzed using SPSS, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and between-group comparisons were performed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric methods.

Findings: The FMD values were significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (5.97 ± 5.29 vs. 10.95 ± 3.78, p < 0.001), and the proportion of individuals with endothelial dysfunction was higher (%51.6 vs. %6.45, p < 0.001). In the dysmenorrhea group, the baseline VolFlow value was 77.4 ± 24.1 ml/min, which increased to 81.4 ± 25.1 ml/min after cuff inflation (p < 0.001). In healthy controls, the VolFlow increased from 69.8 ± 15.3 ml/min to 92.0 ± 15.3 ml/min, but this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). The change in VolFlow (ΔVF) was significantly lower in the dysmenorrhea group (p < 0.001).

Results: Our findings indicate a significant impairment of endothelial function in the primary dysmenorrhea group compared to the control group. Specifically, individuals with primary dysmenorrhea exhibited lower flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and Δ vascular function (ΔVF) values. To further investigate this relationship, large-scale studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书