nirseimab存在时RSV抗原诊断试验的可靠性。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-06 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000005119
Sarah R Sincero, Kelly Ann Mahool, Emma Schaefer, Carolina S Caceres, Elizabeth J Kelly, Deidre Wilkins, Kevin M Tuffy
{"title":"nirseimab存在时RSV抗原诊断试验的可靠性。","authors":"Sarah R Sincero, Kelly Ann Mahool, Emma Schaefer, Carolina S Caceres, Elizabeth J Kelly, Deidre Wilkins, Kevin M Tuffy","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000005119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nirsevimab is approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants. Although nucleic acid detection by polymerase chain reaction is primarily utilized for the clinical diagnosis of RSV, antigen detection is still routinely used and primarily relies on direct interaction with the RSV F protein in patient nasal samples. While expected monoclonal antibody (mAb) levels in nasal samples are typically <1 μg/mL following administration, some mAbs targeting the RSV F protein, such as palivizumab, have been shown to interfere with antigen detection. We assessed whether the presence of nirsevimab in nasal samples may interfere with RSV detection by antigen tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RSV detection was evaluated in 6 antigen detection tests utilizing contrived samples containing RSV A or B, and nirsevimab at 2 concentrations (1 or 10 µg/mL) chosen to estimate and exceed physiologically relevant concentrations. To better simulate real-world diagnostic specimens, RSV-positive nasal samples were pooled and assessed in the presence of nirsevimab in 2 frequently utilized detection tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSV was detected in contrived samples by all diagnostic kits evaluated in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations. Furthermore, RSV was detected in all nasal specimen pools by both diagnostic tests and remained detectable in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations tested, displaying 100% agreement with nonspiked pools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nirsevimab did not interfere with RSV detection with any of the antigen tests evaluated, suggesting patients who receive nirsevimab are unlikely to require alternative assays for clinical RSV diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"549-553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13148500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of RSV Antigen Diagnostic Tests in the Presence of Nirsevimab.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah R Sincero, Kelly Ann Mahool, Emma Schaefer, Carolina S Caceres, Elizabeth J Kelly, Deidre Wilkins, Kevin M Tuffy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/INF.0000000000005119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nirsevimab is approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants. Although nucleic acid detection by polymerase chain reaction is primarily utilized for the clinical diagnosis of RSV, antigen detection is still routinely used and primarily relies on direct interaction with the RSV F protein in patient nasal samples. While expected monoclonal antibody (mAb) levels in nasal samples are typically <1 μg/mL following administration, some mAbs targeting the RSV F protein, such as palivizumab, have been shown to interfere with antigen detection. We assessed whether the presence of nirsevimab in nasal samples may interfere with RSV detection by antigen tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RSV detection was evaluated in 6 antigen detection tests utilizing contrived samples containing RSV A or B, and nirsevimab at 2 concentrations (1 or 10 µg/mL) chosen to estimate and exceed physiologically relevant concentrations. To better simulate real-world diagnostic specimens, RSV-positive nasal samples were pooled and assessed in the presence of nirsevimab in 2 frequently utilized detection tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSV was detected in contrived samples by all diagnostic kits evaluated in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations. Furthermore, RSV was detected in all nasal specimen pools by both diagnostic tests and remained detectable in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations tested, displaying 100% agreement with nonspiked pools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nirsevimab did not interfere with RSV detection with any of the antigen tests evaluated, suggesting patients who receive nirsevimab are unlikely to require alternative assays for clinical RSV diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"549-553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13148500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000005119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000005119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Nirsevimab被批准用于预防新生儿和婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)下呼吸道疾病。尽管聚合酶链反应核酸检测主要用于RSV的临床诊断,但抗原检测仍是常规使用,主要依赖于与患者鼻样本中RSV F蛋白的直接相互作用。方法:在6个抗原检测试验中评估RSV检测,使用人造样本含有RSV A或B,并选择2种浓度(1或10 μ g/mL)的nirsevimab来估计和超过生理相关浓度。为了更好地模拟真实世界的诊断标本,在两种常用的检测试验中,在nirsevimab存在的情况下,对rsv阳性鼻腔样本进行汇总和评估。结果:在两种浓度的尼瑟维单抗存在下,所有诊断试剂盒都能在人造样品中检测到RSV。此外,两种诊断试验在所有鼻标本池中都检测到RSV,并且在两种浓度的检测中都存在nirsevimab,与未加标的样品池显示100%的一致性。结论:Nirsevimab对RSV检测没有任何干扰,这表明接受Nirsevimab治疗的患者不太可能需要其他检测方法来诊断RSV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of RSV Antigen Diagnostic Tests in the Presence of Nirsevimab.

Background: Nirsevimab is approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract disease in neonates and infants. Although nucleic acid detection by polymerase chain reaction is primarily utilized for the clinical diagnosis of RSV, antigen detection is still routinely used and primarily relies on direct interaction with the RSV F protein in patient nasal samples. While expected monoclonal antibody (mAb) levels in nasal samples are typically <1 μg/mL following administration, some mAbs targeting the RSV F protein, such as palivizumab, have been shown to interfere with antigen detection. We assessed whether the presence of nirsevimab in nasal samples may interfere with RSV detection by antigen tests.

Methods: RSV detection was evaluated in 6 antigen detection tests utilizing contrived samples containing RSV A or B, and nirsevimab at 2 concentrations (1 or 10 µg/mL) chosen to estimate and exceed physiologically relevant concentrations. To better simulate real-world diagnostic specimens, RSV-positive nasal samples were pooled and assessed in the presence of nirsevimab in 2 frequently utilized detection tests.

Results: RSV was detected in contrived samples by all diagnostic kits evaluated in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations. Furthermore, RSV was detected in all nasal specimen pools by both diagnostic tests and remained detectable in the presence of nirsevimab at both concentrations tested, displaying 100% agreement with nonspiked pools.

Conclusions: Nirsevimab did not interfere with RSV detection with any of the antigen tests evaluated, suggesting patients who receive nirsevimab are unlikely to require alternative assays for clinical RSV diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书