Polo Barajas-Girón , Miguel Á. Gamboa-Álvarez , Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell , Unai Markaida , Saul Pensamiento-Villarauz , José F. Chávez-Villegas , Lorena Rocha-Tejeda , Alesa Flores-Guzmán , Carlos E. Novelo-Villanueva , Francisco J. Vergara-Solana
{"title":"在墨西哥坎佩切河岸的手工章鱼玛雅渔业中,人工诱饵减少了诱饵的使用","authors":"Polo Barajas-Girón , Miguel Á. Gamboa-Álvarez , Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell , Unai Markaida , Saul Pensamiento-Villarauz , José F. Chávez-Villegas , Lorena Rocha-Tejeda , Alesa Flores-Guzmán , Carlos E. Novelo-Villanueva , Francisco J. Vergara-Solana","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates artificial lures as a sustainable alternative to natural bait in the small-scale red octopus (<em>Octopus maya</em>) fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico. An experiment with 21 fishing trips compared both methods. Lures yielded 26.5 octopuses and 13.7 kg per trip, versus 23.9 octopuses and 12.6 kg with bait. No differences in weight (p = 0.6) or number (p = 0.54) were found, indicating lures are as effective as bait. Based on operational data from three fishing seasons (2021–2023) and interviews with experienced fishers, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of both strategies. Lures are more cost-efficient, mainly due to their reusability. Lure-based operations had an average daily lure cost of 2.12 USD, representing a cost of 0.013USD per kg of octopus. In contrast, bait costs were estimated at USD 31.8 per day per vessel, and USD 0.46 per kg of octopus. Using artificial lures could save approximately half a ton of crabs per vessel, as each vessel typically requires around 6 kg of bait per fishing day over the 90 days commonly fished in a season, thereby significantly reducing fishing pressure on crab populations. Additional benefits of lures include improved hygiene, and no need for refrigeration for bait storing. Although made of plastic, lures contribute to reducing waste by lowering the frequency of line replacement, as bait is often discarded with the tying line. Although potential negative externalities are recognized—requiring monitoring and intervention when justified—lures present a viable solution aligned with broader local fisheries sustainability initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial lures to reduce bait use in the artisanal Octopus maya fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Polo Barajas-Girón , Miguel Á. Gamboa-Álvarez , Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell , Unai Markaida , Saul Pensamiento-Villarauz , José F. Chávez-Villegas , Lorena Rocha-Tejeda , Alesa Flores-Guzmán , Carlos E. Novelo-Villanueva , Francisco J. Vergara-Solana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates artificial lures as a sustainable alternative to natural bait in the small-scale red octopus (<em>Octopus maya</em>) fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico. An experiment with 21 fishing trips compared both methods. Lures yielded 26.5 octopuses and 13.7 kg per trip, versus 23.9 octopuses and 12.6 kg with bait. No differences in weight (p = 0.6) or number (p = 0.54) were found, indicating lures are as effective as bait. Based on operational data from three fishing seasons (2021–2023) and interviews with experienced fishers, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of both strategies. Lures are more cost-efficient, mainly due to their reusability. Lure-based operations had an average daily lure cost of 2.12 USD, representing a cost of 0.013USD per kg of octopus. In contrast, bait costs were estimated at USD 31.8 per day per vessel, and USD 0.46 per kg of octopus. Using artificial lures could save approximately half a ton of crabs per vessel, as each vessel typically requires around 6 kg of bait per fishing day over the 90 days commonly fished in a season, thereby significantly reducing fishing pressure on crab populations. Additional benefits of lures include improved hygiene, and no need for refrigeration for bait storing. Although made of plastic, lures contribute to reducing waste by lowering the frequency of line replacement, as bait is often discarded with the tying line. Although potential negative externalities are recognized—requiring monitoring and intervention when justified—lures present a viable solution aligned with broader local fisheries sustainability initiatives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425001230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425001230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial lures to reduce bait use in the artisanal Octopus maya fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico
This study evaluates artificial lures as a sustainable alternative to natural bait in the small-scale red octopus (Octopus maya) fishery of the Campeche Bank, Mexico. An experiment with 21 fishing trips compared both methods. Lures yielded 26.5 octopuses and 13.7 kg per trip, versus 23.9 octopuses and 12.6 kg with bait. No differences in weight (p = 0.6) or number (p = 0.54) were found, indicating lures are as effective as bait. Based on operational data from three fishing seasons (2021–2023) and interviews with experienced fishers, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of both strategies. Lures are more cost-efficient, mainly due to their reusability. Lure-based operations had an average daily lure cost of 2.12 USD, representing a cost of 0.013USD per kg of octopus. In contrast, bait costs were estimated at USD 31.8 per day per vessel, and USD 0.46 per kg of octopus. Using artificial lures could save approximately half a ton of crabs per vessel, as each vessel typically requires around 6 kg of bait per fishing day over the 90 days commonly fished in a season, thereby significantly reducing fishing pressure on crab populations. Additional benefits of lures include improved hygiene, and no need for refrigeration for bait storing. Although made of plastic, lures contribute to reducing waste by lowering the frequency of line replacement, as bait is often discarded with the tying line. Although potential negative externalities are recognized—requiring monitoring and intervention when justified—lures present a viable solution aligned with broader local fisheries sustainability initiatives.