兔肝区给药顺铂的药理作用。

R Kar, R W Opfell, A G Wile
{"title":"兔肝区给药顺铂的药理作用。","authors":"R Kar,&nbsp;R W Opfell,&nbsp;A G Wile","doi":"10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacology of hepatic regional administration of CisplatinR (DDP) was examined in a rabbit model. Routes and modes of administration were: IV, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), HAI with stopflow, HAI with microembolic material [collagen for embolization (CFE)], and portal vein (PV). DDP was rapidly administered, blood samples were drawn over 45 minutes, and hepatic tissue was obtained. Filterable plasma DDP levels were measured by HPLC. Hepatic DDP levels were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. All modes of regional administration yielded significantly higher hepatic DDP levels when compared to tissue levels following IV administration. Only the PV and HACFE routes resulted in significantly less systemic drug exposure (AUC) when compared to IV administration. These data indicate a relative pharmacologic advantage of 1.8 for HAI, 3.4 for PV, 1.8 for HAI stopflow, and 4.3 for HACFE compared to IV DDP administration. This pre-clinical study demonstrates substantial pharmacologic advantage for PV and HACFE routes of DDP administration and suggests that clinical trials based on this information be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":77686,"journal":{"name":"Cancer drug delivery","volume":"4 4","pages":"225-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pharmacology of hepatic regional administration of cisplatin in a rabbit model.\",\"authors\":\"R Kar,&nbsp;R W Opfell,&nbsp;A G Wile\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pharmacology of hepatic regional administration of CisplatinR (DDP) was examined in a rabbit model. Routes and modes of administration were: IV, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), HAI with stopflow, HAI with microembolic material [collagen for embolization (CFE)], and portal vein (PV). DDP was rapidly administered, blood samples were drawn over 45 minutes, and hepatic tissue was obtained. Filterable plasma DDP levels were measured by HPLC. Hepatic DDP levels were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. All modes of regional administration yielded significantly higher hepatic DDP levels when compared to tissue levels following IV administration. Only the PV and HACFE routes resulted in significantly less systemic drug exposure (AUC) when compared to IV administration. These data indicate a relative pharmacologic advantage of 1.8 for HAI, 3.4 for PV, 1.8 for HAI stopflow, and 4.3 for HACFE compared to IV DDP administration. This pre-clinical study demonstrates substantial pharmacologic advantage for PV and HACFE routes of DDP administration and suggests that clinical trials based on this information be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer drug delivery\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"225-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cdd.1987.4.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

用家兔模型研究了顺铂肝区给药的药理作用。给药途径和方式为:静脉、肝动脉输注(HAI)、肝动脉输注(HAI)联合停流、肝动脉输注(HAI)联合微栓塞材料[胶原蛋白栓塞(CFE)]、门静脉输注(PV)。迅速给予DDP,在45分钟内抽取血液样本,并获得肝组织。采用高效液相色谱法测定可过滤血浆DDP水平。用原子吸收光谱法测定肝脏DDP水平。与静脉给药后的组织水平相比,所有区域给药模式均产生显著更高的肝脏DDP水平。与静脉给药相比,只有PV和HACFE途径显著降低了全身药物暴露(AUC)。这些数据表明,与静脉注射DDP相比,HAI的相对药理学优势为1.8,PV为3.4,HAI停流为1.8,HACFE为4.3。这项临床前研究表明,DDP给药的PV和HACFE途径具有实质性的药理学优势,并建议考虑基于这一信息进行临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The pharmacology of hepatic regional administration of cisplatin in a rabbit model.

The pharmacology of hepatic regional administration of CisplatinR (DDP) was examined in a rabbit model. Routes and modes of administration were: IV, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), HAI with stopflow, HAI with microembolic material [collagen for embolization (CFE)], and portal vein (PV). DDP was rapidly administered, blood samples were drawn over 45 minutes, and hepatic tissue was obtained. Filterable plasma DDP levels were measured by HPLC. Hepatic DDP levels were determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. All modes of regional administration yielded significantly higher hepatic DDP levels when compared to tissue levels following IV administration. Only the PV and HACFE routes resulted in significantly less systemic drug exposure (AUC) when compared to IV administration. These data indicate a relative pharmacologic advantage of 1.8 for HAI, 3.4 for PV, 1.8 for HAI stopflow, and 4.3 for HACFE compared to IV DDP administration. This pre-clinical study demonstrates substantial pharmacologic advantage for PV and HACFE routes of DDP administration and suggests that clinical trials based on this information be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信