[虚拟现实(VR)支持的正念干预对化疗期间癌症患者的可行性]。

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
André Karger, Steffen Holsteg, Tanja N Fehm, Norbert Gattermann, Sebastian Sage, Ulrike Dinger, Nora K Schaal, Luisa Ernsten
{"title":"[虚拟现实(VR)支持的正念干预对化疗期间癌症患者的可行性]。","authors":"André Karger, Steffen Holsteg, Tanja N Fehm, Norbert Gattermann, Sebastian Sage, Ulrike Dinger, Nora K Schaal, Luisa Ernsten","doi":"10.1055/a-2748-3269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological interventions delivered during chemotherapy can help cancer patients reduce their subjective distress. The use of virtual reality (VR) may enhance their effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a VR-based mindfulness intervention during outpatient chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a monocentric, three-arm randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer undergoing treatment in the outpatient chemotherapy unit of an oncology center were randomized to one of three groups: (a) VR-based mindfulness intervention, (b) receptive music intervention, or (c) control group. Interventions were delivered during two consecutive chemotherapy sessions. Feasibility was assessed through standardized screening information collected prior to recruitment and structured participant observation during the interventions; acceptability was measured using a post-intervention questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,072 patients approached, 1,590 formally met the inclusion criteria, and <i>N</i>=85 were enrolled (participation rate: 5.4%). Common reasons for non-participation included wearing a cooling cap, language barriers, lack of interest, and reliance on personal coping strategies. Both interventions were feasible; disruptions during sessions were common. The VR-based mindfulness intervention required substantial personnel support. Despite overall positive ratings from participants, VR mindfulness did not show higher acceptability than music.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The high proportion of non-participating patients may indicate that an active VR-based mindfulness intervention during chemotherapy infusion is not well aligned with patient needs and may be experienced as potentially overwhelming. Its benefits might be better realized at a different point in the care trajectory (e. g., at home, between sessions) or later after treatment completion (survivorship phase). For immediate relief during chemotherapy, music interventions appear to be a simpler, more easily implemented alternative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating digital psychological interventions into routine oncology care requires stronger consideration of patients' specific needs and the situational and organizational contexts in which these interventions are delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"388-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Feasibility of a virtual reality (VR)-supported mindfulness intervention for patients with cancer during chemotherapy].\",\"authors\":\"André Karger, Steffen Holsteg, Tanja N Fehm, Norbert Gattermann, Sebastian Sage, Ulrike Dinger, Nora K Schaal, Luisa Ernsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2748-3269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological interventions delivered during chemotherapy can help cancer patients reduce their subjective distress. The use of virtual reality (VR) may enhance their effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a VR-based mindfulness intervention during outpatient chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a monocentric, three-arm randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer undergoing treatment in the outpatient chemotherapy unit of an oncology center were randomized to one of three groups: (a) VR-based mindfulness intervention, (b) receptive music intervention, or (c) control group. Interventions were delivered during two consecutive chemotherapy sessions. Feasibility was assessed through standardized screening information collected prior to recruitment and structured participant observation during the interventions; acceptability was measured using a post-intervention questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,072 patients approached, 1,590 formally met the inclusion criteria, and <i>N</i>=85 were enrolled (participation rate: 5.4%). Common reasons for non-participation included wearing a cooling cap, language barriers, lack of interest, and reliance on personal coping strategies. Both interventions were feasible; disruptions during sessions were common. The VR-based mindfulness intervention required substantial personnel support. Despite overall positive ratings from participants, VR mindfulness did not show higher acceptability than music.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The high proportion of non-participating patients may indicate that an active VR-based mindfulness intervention during chemotherapy infusion is not well aligned with patient needs and may be experienced as potentially overwhelming. Its benefits might be better realized at a different point in the care trajectory (e. g., at home, between sessions) or later after treatment completion (survivorship phase). For immediate relief during chemotherapy, music interventions appear to be a simpler, more easily implemented alternative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating digital psychological interventions into routine oncology care requires stronger consideration of patients' specific needs and the situational and organizational contexts in which these interventions are delivered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"388-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2748-3269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2748-3269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化疗期间的心理干预可以帮助癌症患者减少主观痛苦。使用虚拟现实(VR)可以提高他们的有效性。本研究旨在评估基于vr的正念干预在门诊化疗中的可行性和可接受性。在一项单中心、三组随机对照试验中,在肿瘤中心门诊化疗单元接受治疗的癌症患者被随机分为三组:(a)基于vr的正念干预,(b)接受性音乐干预,或(c)对照组。干预措施在连续两次化疗期间进行。通过招募前收集的标准化筛选信息和干预期间的结构化参与者观察来评估可行性;采用干预后问卷测量可接受性。在3072例患者中,1590例符合纳入标准,N=85例入组(参与率5.4%)。不参加的常见原因包括戴冷却帽、语言障碍、缺乏兴趣以及依赖个人应对策略。两种干预措施均可行;会议期间的中断很常见。基于vr的正念干预需要大量的人员支持。尽管参与者的总体评价是积极的,但VR正念并没有表现出比音乐更高的接受度。高比例的未参与患者可能表明,在化疗输注期间,积极的基于vr的正念干预与患者的需求不太一致,可能会被认为是潜在的压倒性的。它的好处可能在护理轨迹的不同点得到更好的实现(例如:(在家里,疗程之间)或治疗完成后(生存期)。在化疗期间,音乐干预似乎是一种更简单、更容易实施的替代方案。将数字心理干预整合到常规肿瘤护理中,需要更多地考虑患者的具体需求以及提供这些干预的情境和组织背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Feasibility of a virtual reality (VR)-supported mindfulness intervention for patients with cancer during chemotherapy].

Objective: Psychological interventions delivered during chemotherapy can help cancer patients reduce their subjective distress. The use of virtual reality (VR) may enhance their effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a VR-based mindfulness intervention during outpatient chemotherapy.

Methods: In a monocentric, three-arm randomized controlled trial, patients with cancer undergoing treatment in the outpatient chemotherapy unit of an oncology center were randomized to one of three groups: (a) VR-based mindfulness intervention, (b) receptive music intervention, or (c) control group. Interventions were delivered during two consecutive chemotherapy sessions. Feasibility was assessed through standardized screening information collected prior to recruitment and structured participant observation during the interventions; acceptability was measured using a post-intervention questionnaire.

Results: Of 3,072 patients approached, 1,590 formally met the inclusion criteria, and N=85 were enrolled (participation rate: 5.4%). Common reasons for non-participation included wearing a cooling cap, language barriers, lack of interest, and reliance on personal coping strategies. Both interventions were feasible; disruptions during sessions were common. The VR-based mindfulness intervention required substantial personnel support. Despite overall positive ratings from participants, VR mindfulness did not show higher acceptability than music.

Discussion: The high proportion of non-participating patients may indicate that an active VR-based mindfulness intervention during chemotherapy infusion is not well aligned with patient needs and may be experienced as potentially overwhelming. Its benefits might be better realized at a different point in the care trajectory (e. g., at home, between sessions) or later after treatment completion (survivorship phase). For immediate relief during chemotherapy, music interventions appear to be a simpler, more easily implemented alternative.

Conclusion: Integrating digital psychological interventions into routine oncology care requires stronger consideration of patients' specific needs and the situational and organizational contexts in which these interventions are delivered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书