澳大利亚复苏在败血症评估中的统计分析计划:急诊科败血症中的液体或血管加压剂(ARISE FLUid)试验

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100157
Elissa M. Milford BSc, MBBS, PhD, FCICM , Stephen P.J. Macdonald BSc (Hons), MBChB, PhD, DCH, FRCP (Edin), FACEM , Ary Serpa-Neto MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM , Anthony Delaney FCICM, FACEM, PhD , Alisa M. Higgins PhD, MPH, BPhysio (Hons) , Belinda Howe RN, BAppSc (Nursing), CCCert, MPH , Sandra L. Peake FCICM, PhD , ARISE FLUIDS Investigators
{"title":"澳大利亚复苏在败血症评估中的统计分析计划:急诊科败血症中的液体或血管加压剂(ARISE FLUid)试验","authors":"Elissa M. Milford BSc, MBBS, PhD, FCICM ,&nbsp;Stephen P.J. Macdonald BSc (Hons), MBChB, PhD, DCH, FRCP (Edin), FACEM ,&nbsp;Ary Serpa-Neto MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM ,&nbsp;Anthony Delaney FCICM, FACEM, PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa M. Higgins PhD, MPH, BPhysio (Hons) ,&nbsp;Belinda Howe RN, BAppSc (Nursing), CCCert, MPH ,&nbsp;Sandra L. Peake FCICM, PhD ,&nbsp;ARISE FLUIDS Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal approach to haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock is uncertain and will be evaluated in The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to describe the prespecified ARISE FLUIDS statistical analysis plan (SAP).</div></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants, and interventions</h3><div>The ARISE FLUIDS trial is a 1000-participant international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing restricted intravenous fluid volume and earlier introduction of vasopressors (vasopressor strategy) to larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later introduction of vasopressors if required (fluids strategy) in adults with early septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at 90 days post randomisation, and the difference in medians between the two treatment groups will be estimated using a linear quantile mixed-effect regression model. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival censored at day 90, ventilator-, vasopressor-, and acute renal replacement–free days censored at day 28 and death or disability at 6 and 12 months</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ARISE FLUIDS will compare the effects of a vasopressor vs. fluids strategy on days alive and out of hospital at 90 days in adults with early septic shock. The prespecified SAP is reported here to mitigate analysis bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analysis plan for the Australasian Resuscitation in sepsis evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors in emergency department sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial\",\"authors\":\"Elissa M. Milford BSc, MBBS, PhD, FCICM ,&nbsp;Stephen P.J. Macdonald BSc (Hons), MBChB, PhD, DCH, FRCP (Edin), FACEM ,&nbsp;Ary Serpa-Neto MD, MSc, PhD, FCICM ,&nbsp;Anthony Delaney FCICM, FACEM, PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa M. Higgins PhD, MPH, BPhysio (Hons) ,&nbsp;Belinda Howe RN, BAppSc (Nursing), CCCert, MPH ,&nbsp;Sandra L. Peake FCICM, PhD ,&nbsp;ARISE FLUIDS Investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal approach to haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock is uncertain and will be evaluated in The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to describe the prespecified ARISE FLUIDS statistical analysis plan (SAP).</div></div><div><h3>Design, setting, participants, and interventions</h3><div>The ARISE FLUIDS trial is a 1000-participant international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing restricted intravenous fluid volume and earlier introduction of vasopressors (vasopressor strategy) to larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later introduction of vasopressors if required (fluids strategy) in adults with early septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at 90 days post randomisation, and the difference in medians between the two treatment groups will be estimated using a linear quantile mixed-effect regression model. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival censored at day 90, ventilator-, vasopressor-, and acute renal replacement–free days censored at day 28 and death or disability at 6 and 12 months</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ARISE FLUIDS will compare the effects of a vasopressor vs. fluids strategy on days alive and out of hospital at 90 days in adults with early septic shock. The prespecified SAP is reported here to mitigate analysis bias.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277225000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脓毒性休克患者血流动力学复苏的最佳方法尚不确定,将在澳大利亚败血症复苏评估:急诊科败血症(ARISE FLUid)试验中进行评估。目的描述预先设定的ARISE流体统计分析计划(SAP)。设计、环境、参与者和干预措施ARISE流体试验是一项有1000名参与者的国际多中心随机对照试验,比较澳大利亚各试验点急诊就诊的早期感染性休克成人的静脉输液量受限并早期引入血管加压剂(血管加压剂策略)与初始静脉输液量较大并在需要时再引入血管加压剂(液体策略)的情况。新西兰和爱尔兰。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为随机化后90天的存活天数和出院天数,使用线性分位数混合效应回归模型估计两个治疗组之间的中位数差异。次要结局包括第90天的生存时间,第28天无呼吸机、无血管加压剂和无急性肾代用品的天数,以及第6个月和第12个月的死亡或残疾。结论:arise流体将比较血管加压剂与液体策略对早期感染性休克成人存活天数和出院天数的影响。这里报告预先指定的SAP是为了减轻分析偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical analysis plan for the Australasian Resuscitation in sepsis evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors in emergency department sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial

Background

The optimal approach to haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock is uncertain and will be evaluated in The Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis (ARISE FLUIDS) trial.

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the prespecified ARISE FLUIDS statistical analysis plan (SAP).

Design, setting, participants, and interventions

The ARISE FLUIDS trial is a 1000-participant international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing restricted intravenous fluid volume and earlier introduction of vasopressors (vasopressor strategy) to larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later introduction of vasopressors if required (fluids strategy) in adults with early septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at 90 days post randomisation, and the difference in medians between the two treatment groups will be estimated using a linear quantile mixed-effect regression model. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival censored at day 90, ventilator-, vasopressor-, and acute renal replacement–free days censored at day 28 and death or disability at 6 and 12 months

Conclusion

ARISE FLUIDS will compare the effects of a vasopressor vs. fluids strategy on days alive and out of hospital at 90 days in adults with early septic shock. The prespecified SAP is reported here to mitigate analysis bias.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书