对选定的欧洲屠宰场的生物安全和屠宰做法进行评估,重点是控制沙门氏菌和戊型肝炎病毒污染

IF 3.5 Q1 Social Sciences
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jobb.2025.11.001
Tarmo Niine , Arvo Viltrop , Imbi Nurmoja , Richard Piers Smith , Enrico Pavoni , Giovanni Loris Alborali , Giovanni Ianiro , Ilaria Di Bartolo , Tijs Tobias , Elena Lucia Sassu , Elke Burow
{"title":"对选定的欧洲屠宰场的生物安全和屠宰做法进行评估,重点是控制沙门氏菌和戊型肝炎病毒污染","authors":"Tarmo Niine ,&nbsp;Arvo Viltrop ,&nbsp;Imbi Nurmoja ,&nbsp;Richard Piers Smith ,&nbsp;Enrico Pavoni ,&nbsp;Giovanni Loris Alborali ,&nbsp;Giovanni Ianiro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Di Bartolo ,&nbsp;Tijs Tobias ,&nbsp;Elena Lucia Sassu ,&nbsp;Elke Burow","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2025.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The zoonotic pathogens <em>Salmonella</em> and hepatitis E virus (HEV) are frequently found in domestic pigs. The consumption of contaminated pig meat products is one of the most common routes of such infections in humans. Accordingly, it is important for abattoirs to implement adequate biosecurity and slaughter practises (BSPs) to control these microorganisms during production. However, checklists that abattoir staff or officials can use to assess whether BSPs are being implemented are not freely available. In the current study, which was conducted under the Biosecurity Practises for Pig Farming across Europe (BIOPIGEE) project as part of the European Joint Programme under Horizon 2020, we developed a questionnaire based on research published in recent decades and conducted an online survey of European abattoirs to determine which BSPs were being implemented to avoid pig carcass contamination with <em>Salmonella</em> and HEV. We received and analysed a total of 32 responses from Austria (3), Czechia (10), Estonia (2), Germany (6), Italy (5), the Netherlands (2), and the UK (4). The results revealed that most of the abattoirs adhered to well-established practises, such as hygienic evisceration, scalding, and controlled singeing. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified. The small abattoirs reported the less consistent use of effective scalding procedures and relied more frequently on the manual removal of visible carcass contamination, whereas in the large abattoirs, standardised trimming or hot water washing was applied more often. These differences highlight the areas where targeted interventions, particularly improved cleaning methods for visibly contaminated carcasses, could substantially reduce the risk of <em>Salmonella</em> contamination. The results of this study could help abattoirs benchmark their current BSPs against those of their peers. Additionally, the questionnaire developed for this study may provide a useful checklist of practises and ideas to enhance BSP implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 168-179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the biosecurity and slaughter practises in selected European abattoirs with a focus on the control of Salmonella and hepatitis E virus contamination\",\"authors\":\"Tarmo Niine ,&nbsp;Arvo Viltrop ,&nbsp;Imbi Nurmoja ,&nbsp;Richard Piers Smith ,&nbsp;Enrico Pavoni ,&nbsp;Giovanni Loris Alborali ,&nbsp;Giovanni Ianiro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Di Bartolo ,&nbsp;Tijs Tobias ,&nbsp;Elena Lucia Sassu ,&nbsp;Elke Burow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobb.2025.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The zoonotic pathogens <em>Salmonella</em> and hepatitis E virus (HEV) are frequently found in domestic pigs. The consumption of contaminated pig meat products is one of the most common routes of such infections in humans. Accordingly, it is important for abattoirs to implement adequate biosecurity and slaughter practises (BSPs) to control these microorganisms during production. However, checklists that abattoir staff or officials can use to assess whether BSPs are being implemented are not freely available. In the current study, which was conducted under the Biosecurity Practises for Pig Farming across Europe (BIOPIGEE) project as part of the European Joint Programme under Horizon 2020, we developed a questionnaire based on research published in recent decades and conducted an online survey of European abattoirs to determine which BSPs were being implemented to avoid pig carcass contamination with <em>Salmonella</em> and HEV. We received and analysed a total of 32 responses from Austria (3), Czechia (10), Estonia (2), Germany (6), Italy (5), the Netherlands (2), and the UK (4). The results revealed that most of the abattoirs adhered to well-established practises, such as hygienic evisceration, scalding, and controlled singeing. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified. The small abattoirs reported the less consistent use of effective scalding procedures and relied more frequently on the manual removal of visible carcass contamination, whereas in the large abattoirs, standardised trimming or hot water washing was applied more often. These differences highlight the areas where targeted interventions, particularly improved cleaning methods for visibly contaminated carcasses, could substantially reduce the risk of <em>Salmonella</em> contamination. The results of this study could help abattoirs benchmark their current BSPs against those of their peers. Additionally, the questionnaire developed for this study may provide a useful checklist of practises and ideas to enhance BSP implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 168-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258893382500041X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258893382500041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人畜共患病原体沙门氏菌和戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)常在家猪中发现。食用受污染的猪肉产品是人类感染这种疾病的最常见途径之一。因此,重要的是屠宰场在生产过程中实施适当的生物安全和屠宰规范(BSPs)来控制这些微生物。然而,屠宰场工作人员或官员可以用来评估是否实施了生物检疫措施的检查清单并不是免费提供的。目前的研究是在欧洲养猪业生物安全实践(BIOPIGEE)项目下进行的,该项目是地平线2020下欧洲联合计划的一部分,我们根据近几十年发表的研究编写了一份问卷,并对欧洲屠宰场进行了在线调查,以确定正在实施哪些BSPs以避免猪胴体受到沙门氏菌和HEV污染。我们共收到并分析了来自奥地利(3)、捷克(10)、爱沙尼亚(2)、德国(6)、意大利(5)、荷兰(2)和英国(4)的32份回复。结果显示,大多数屠宰场都遵循公认的做法,如卫生的内脏取出、烫伤和控制烧灼。尽管如此,还是发现了明显的差距。小型屠宰场报告说,不太经常使用有效的烫伤程序,更多地依赖于人工清除可见的胴体污染,而在大型屠宰场,标准化修剪或热水洗涤更经常使用。这些差异突出了有针对性的干预措施,特别是改进对明显受污染的胴体的清洁方法,可以大大降低沙门氏菌污染风险的领域。这项研究的结果可以帮助屠宰场将他们目前的BSPs与同行进行比较。此外,为本研究开发的问卷可能提供有用的实践和想法清单,以加强BSP的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the biosecurity and slaughter practises in selected European abattoirs with a focus on the control of Salmonella and hepatitis E virus contamination
The zoonotic pathogens Salmonella and hepatitis E virus (HEV) are frequently found in domestic pigs. The consumption of contaminated pig meat products is one of the most common routes of such infections in humans. Accordingly, it is important for abattoirs to implement adequate biosecurity and slaughter practises (BSPs) to control these microorganisms during production. However, checklists that abattoir staff or officials can use to assess whether BSPs are being implemented are not freely available. In the current study, which was conducted under the Biosecurity Practises for Pig Farming across Europe (BIOPIGEE) project as part of the European Joint Programme under Horizon 2020, we developed a questionnaire based on research published in recent decades and conducted an online survey of European abattoirs to determine which BSPs were being implemented to avoid pig carcass contamination with Salmonella and HEV. We received and analysed a total of 32 responses from Austria (3), Czechia (10), Estonia (2), Germany (6), Italy (5), the Netherlands (2), and the UK (4). The results revealed that most of the abattoirs adhered to well-established practises, such as hygienic evisceration, scalding, and controlled singeing. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified. The small abattoirs reported the less consistent use of effective scalding procedures and relied more frequently on the manual removal of visible carcass contamination, whereas in the large abattoirs, standardised trimming or hot water washing was applied more often. These differences highlight the areas where targeted interventions, particularly improved cleaning methods for visibly contaminated carcasses, could substantially reduce the risk of Salmonella contamination. The results of this study could help abattoirs benchmark their current BSPs against those of their peers. Additionally, the questionnaire developed for this study may provide a useful checklist of practises and ideas to enhance BSP implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书