通过物质流分析对食品系统的可持续性的物理理解:一个重要的回顾

IF 9.6 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Zhuang Qian , Wu Chen , Li Xue , Andrea Adelmo Della Penna , Jeanine Ammann , Carole Liechti , Dario Dongo , Gang Liu
{"title":"通过物质流分析对食品系统的可持续性的物理理解:一个重要的回顾","authors":"Zhuang Qian ,&nbsp;Wu Chen ,&nbsp;Li Xue ,&nbsp;Andrea Adelmo Della Penna ,&nbsp;Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Carole Liechti ,&nbsp;Dario Dongo ,&nbsp;Gang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transforming food systems is essential for global sustainability and requires understanding from both socioeconomic and physical dimensions. However, sustainable food systems literature is largely dominated by socioeconomic dimension, while physical understanding of food systems remains limited. Such physical characterisation is often done using material flow analysis (MFA) to explore and quantify flows from farm to fork. This quantification translates food system dynamics into comparable and transparent metrics, making MFA a crucial tool in driving an efficient transformation. Here, using a critical literature review, we analysed 127 agrifood MFA studies on their systems, data, and indicators. We characterized food supply chain into five stages (primary production, processing and manufacturing, trade, distribution and retailing, and public and household consumption) and found very few covered all stages (16 studies). Among all stages, primary production was the most studied (99 studies), while distribution and retailing was the least studied (33 studies). Existing studies covered 12 food categories, primarily focusing on cereals (52 %), vegetables (46 %), and meats (43 %), with less attention on dairy products (34 %). Only 34 studies have a single food category resolution, while most aggregated multiple categories together. We found that over half of agrifood MFAs used data only from secondary sources (e.g., statistics), whereas less than 20 % used exclusively primary data. Agrifood MFAs commonly used indicators of substance, food, and bio-nutrient to quantify biomass associated flows, informing key food systems issues like nutrient circularity and waste management. Accordingly, we call for research on full chain MFAs, single food category analyses, and the use of more targeted datasets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100896"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical understanding of food systems towards sustainability with material flow analysis: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"Zhuang Qian ,&nbsp;Wu Chen ,&nbsp;Li Xue ,&nbsp;Andrea Adelmo Della Penna ,&nbsp;Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Carole Liechti ,&nbsp;Dario Dongo ,&nbsp;Gang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transforming food systems is essential for global sustainability and requires understanding from both socioeconomic and physical dimensions. However, sustainable food systems literature is largely dominated by socioeconomic dimension, while physical understanding of food systems remains limited. Such physical characterisation is often done using material flow analysis (MFA) to explore and quantify flows from farm to fork. This quantification translates food system dynamics into comparable and transparent metrics, making MFA a crucial tool in driving an efficient transformation. Here, using a critical literature review, we analysed 127 agrifood MFA studies on their systems, data, and indicators. We characterized food supply chain into five stages (primary production, processing and manufacturing, trade, distribution and retailing, and public and household consumption) and found very few covered all stages (16 studies). Among all stages, primary production was the most studied (99 studies), while distribution and retailing was the least studied (33 studies). Existing studies covered 12 food categories, primarily focusing on cereals (52 %), vegetables (46 %), and meats (43 %), with less attention on dairy products (34 %). Only 34 studies have a single food category resolution, while most aggregated multiple categories together. We found that over half of agrifood MFAs used data only from secondary sources (e.g., statistics), whereas less than 20 % used exclusively primary data. Agrifood MFAs commonly used indicators of substance, food, and bio-nutrient to quantify biomass associated flows, informing key food systems issues like nutrient circularity and waste management. Accordingly, we call for research on full chain MFAs, single food category analyses, and the use of more targeted datasets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912425000719\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912425000719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

粮食系统转型对全球可持续性至关重要,需要从社会经济和物质两方面进行理解。然而,可持续粮食系统的文献在很大程度上是由社会经济维度主导的,而对粮食系统的物理理解仍然有限。这种物理特征通常使用物料流分析(MFA)来探索和量化从农场到餐桌的流动。这种量化将粮食系统动态转化为可比较和透明的指标,使MFA成为推动有效转型的关键工具。本文通过文献综述,分析了127项农业食品MFA研究的系统、数据和指标。我们将食品供应链分为五个阶段(初级生产、加工和制造、贸易、分销和零售以及公共和家庭消费),发现很少有研究涵盖所有阶段(16项研究)。在所有阶段中,对初级生产的研究最多(99项研究),对分销和零售的研究最少(33项研究)。现有的研究涵盖了12种食物类别,主要集中在谷物(52% %)、蔬菜(46% %)和肉类(43% %),较少关注乳制品(34% %)。只有34项研究有单一的食物类别,而大多数研究将多个类别合并在一起。我们发现,超过一半的农业食品MFAs仅使用二手来源的数据(例如统计数据),而不到20% %的MFAs完全使用原始数据。农业食品MFAs通常使用物质、食品和生物营养素指标来量化与生物质相关的流动,为营养循环和废物管理等关键粮食系统问题提供信息。因此,我们呼吁研究全链mfa,单一食品类别分析,并使用更有针对性的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physical understanding of food systems towards sustainability with material flow analysis: A critical review

Physical understanding of food systems towards sustainability with material flow analysis: A critical review
Transforming food systems is essential for global sustainability and requires understanding from both socioeconomic and physical dimensions. However, sustainable food systems literature is largely dominated by socioeconomic dimension, while physical understanding of food systems remains limited. Such physical characterisation is often done using material flow analysis (MFA) to explore and quantify flows from farm to fork. This quantification translates food system dynamics into comparable and transparent metrics, making MFA a crucial tool in driving an efficient transformation. Here, using a critical literature review, we analysed 127 agrifood MFA studies on their systems, data, and indicators. We characterized food supply chain into five stages (primary production, processing and manufacturing, trade, distribution and retailing, and public and household consumption) and found very few covered all stages (16 studies). Among all stages, primary production was the most studied (99 studies), while distribution and retailing was the least studied (33 studies). Existing studies covered 12 food categories, primarily focusing on cereals (52 %), vegetables (46 %), and meats (43 %), with less attention on dairy products (34 %). Only 34 studies have a single food category resolution, while most aggregated multiple categories together. We found that over half of agrifood MFAs used data only from secondary sources (e.g., statistics), whereas less than 20 % used exclusively primary data. Agrifood MFAs commonly used indicators of substance, food, and bio-nutrient to quantify biomass associated flows, informing key food systems issues like nutrient circularity and waste management. Accordingly, we call for research on full chain MFAs, single food category analyses, and the use of more targeted datasets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书