记忆早期记忆的年龄相关差异和共性:年轻人和老年人的比较。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2025.2594556
Berivan Ece, Sami Gülgöz
{"title":"记忆早期记忆的年龄相关差异和共性:年轻人和老年人的比较。","authors":"Berivan Ece, Sami Gülgöz","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2025.2594556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated age-related differences and commonalities in earliest memories, focusing on retrieval speed, recollection type (remember vs. know), retrieval type (direct vs. generative), age at the time of the event, and phenomenological characteristics. The sample consisted of 131 adults: 68 young adults (48.5% males; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 20.29, <i>Sa<sub>ge</sub></i> = 1.53) and 63 older adults (47.6% males; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 68.43, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 4.11). They reported their earliest memories, estimated their age at the time, indicated recollection and retrieval types, and rated event characteristics (e.g., importance, vividness). Results showed that older adults were significantly more likely to classify their memories as <i>remembered</i> and <i>directly</i> retrieved, whereas young adults had a more balanced distribution of the classifications. <i>Directly</i> retrieved memories were accessed more rapidly than <i>generatively</i> retrieved ones, and young adults demonstrated shorter retrieval latencies than older adults. Additionally, older adults dated their earliest memories to later age and rated them as significantly more vivid, emotionally intense, and personally meaningful. Recollection type was not associated with retrieval latency but linked to higher vividness and confidence. Overall, our findings demonstrate potential age-related shifts in the retrieval and subjective evaluation of earliest autobiographical memories.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":" ","pages":"57-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-related differences and commonalities in remembering earliest memories: a comparison of young and older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Berivan Ece, Sami Gülgöz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09658211.2025.2594556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated age-related differences and commonalities in earliest memories, focusing on retrieval speed, recollection type (remember vs. know), retrieval type (direct vs. generative), age at the time of the event, and phenomenological characteristics. The sample consisted of 131 adults: 68 young adults (48.5% males; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 20.29, <i>Sa<sub>ge</sub></i> = 1.53) and 63 older adults (47.6% males; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 68.43, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 4.11). They reported their earliest memories, estimated their age at the time, indicated recollection and retrieval types, and rated event characteristics (e.g., importance, vividness). Results showed that older adults were significantly more likely to classify their memories as <i>remembered</i> and <i>directly</i> retrieved, whereas young adults had a more balanced distribution of the classifications. <i>Directly</i> retrieved memories were accessed more rapidly than <i>generatively</i> retrieved ones, and young adults demonstrated shorter retrieval latencies than older adults. Additionally, older adults dated their earliest memories to later age and rated them as significantly more vivid, emotionally intense, and personally meaningful. Recollection type was not associated with retrieval latency but linked to higher vividness and confidence. Overall, our findings demonstrate potential age-related shifts in the retrieval and subjective evaluation of earliest autobiographical memories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"57-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2594556\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2594556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了与年龄相关的早期记忆的差异和共性,重点是检索速度、回忆类型(记住与知道)、检索类型(直接与生成)、事件发生时的年龄和现象学特征。样本包括131名成年人:68名年轻人(48.5%男性;Mage = 20.29, Sage = 1.53)和63名老年人(47.6%男性;Mage = 68.43, SDage = 4.11)。他们报告了他们最早的记忆,估计了他们当时的年龄,指出了回忆和提取的类型,并对事件特征(如重要性、生动性)进行了评级。结果表明,老年人更有可能将他们的记忆分类为记忆和直接检索,而年轻人的分类分布更为平衡。直接检索的记忆比生成检索的记忆更快,年轻人比老年人表现出更短的检索潜伏期。此外,老年人将他们最早的记忆追溯到较晚的年龄,并认为这些记忆明显更生动、情感更强烈、对个人更有意义。回忆类型与检索延迟无关,但与更高的生动度和信心有关。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在早期自传体记忆的检索和主观评价中,潜在的年龄相关变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-related differences and commonalities in remembering earliest memories: a comparison of young and older adults.

We investigated age-related differences and commonalities in earliest memories, focusing on retrieval speed, recollection type (remember vs. know), retrieval type (direct vs. generative), age at the time of the event, and phenomenological characteristics. The sample consisted of 131 adults: 68 young adults (48.5% males; Mage = 20.29, Sage = 1.53) and 63 older adults (47.6% males; Mage = 68.43, SDage = 4.11). They reported their earliest memories, estimated their age at the time, indicated recollection and retrieval types, and rated event characteristics (e.g., importance, vividness). Results showed that older adults were significantly more likely to classify their memories as remembered and directly retrieved, whereas young adults had a more balanced distribution of the classifications. Directly retrieved memories were accessed more rapidly than generatively retrieved ones, and young adults demonstrated shorter retrieval latencies than older adults. Additionally, older adults dated their earliest memories to later age and rated them as significantly more vivid, emotionally intense, and personally meaningful. Recollection type was not associated with retrieval latency but linked to higher vividness and confidence. Overall, our findings demonstrate potential age-related shifts in the retrieval and subjective evaluation of earliest autobiographical memories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书