{"title":"碳定价、商品市场和经济稳定:来自欧盟排放交易体系的证据","authors":"Kejia Yan , Boqiang Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the dynamic spillover effects between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and major commodity futures, including energy, agricultural products, and precious metals, across all four phases of the EU ETS. Using the quantile connectedness framework, we capture heterogeneous and asymmetric transmission mechanisms under different market regimes. The results show that EUA futures are predominantly net receivers of shocks from global commodity markets, reflecting their strong integration with energy and financial systems. Nevertheless, EUAs act as net transmitters to fossil fuels—particularly natural gas and coal—under specific conditions, while spillovers to wheat occur mainly in extreme positive markets, raising concerns over food affordability. These findings highlight that EUA prices within the 20 %–60 % quantile range are “reasonable,” effectively constraining fossil fuels without destabilising agricultural or precious metal markets. Overall, the study enriches carbon finance literature by extending connectedness methods to the EU ETS, demonstrating that carbon markets function not only as emission reduction instruments but also as key nodes in global commodity interdependence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commodity Markets","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100536"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon pricing, commodity markets, and economic stability: Evidence from the EU ETS\",\"authors\":\"Kejia Yan , Boqiang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the dynamic spillover effects between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and major commodity futures, including energy, agricultural products, and precious metals, across all four phases of the EU ETS. Using the quantile connectedness framework, we capture heterogeneous and asymmetric transmission mechanisms under different market regimes. The results show that EUA futures are predominantly net receivers of shocks from global commodity markets, reflecting their strong integration with energy and financial systems. Nevertheless, EUAs act as net transmitters to fossil fuels—particularly natural gas and coal—under specific conditions, while spillovers to wheat occur mainly in extreme positive markets, raising concerns over food affordability. These findings highlight that EUA prices within the 20 %–60 % quantile range are “reasonable,” effectively constraining fossil fuels without destabilising agricultural or precious metal markets. Overall, the study enriches carbon finance literature by extending connectedness methods to the EU ETS, demonstrating that carbon markets function not only as emission reduction instruments but also as key nodes in global commodity interdependence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commodity Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851325000807\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commodity Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405851325000807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Carbon pricing, commodity markets, and economic stability: Evidence from the EU ETS
This study investigates the dynamic spillover effects between European Union Allowance (EUA) futures and major commodity futures, including energy, agricultural products, and precious metals, across all four phases of the EU ETS. Using the quantile connectedness framework, we capture heterogeneous and asymmetric transmission mechanisms under different market regimes. The results show that EUA futures are predominantly net receivers of shocks from global commodity markets, reflecting their strong integration with energy and financial systems. Nevertheless, EUAs act as net transmitters to fossil fuels—particularly natural gas and coal—under specific conditions, while spillovers to wheat occur mainly in extreme positive markets, raising concerns over food affordability. These findings highlight that EUA prices within the 20 %–60 % quantile range are “reasonable,” effectively constraining fossil fuels without destabilising agricultural or precious metal markets. Overall, the study enriches carbon finance literature by extending connectedness methods to the EU ETS, demonstrating that carbon markets function not only as emission reduction instruments but also as key nodes in global commodity interdependence.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal is also to stimulate international dialog among academics, industry participants, traders, investors, and policymakers with mutual interests in commodity markets. The mandate for the journal is to present ongoing work within commodity economics and finance. Topics can be related to financialization of commodity markets; pricing, hedging, and risk analysis of commodity derivatives; risk premia in commodity markets; real option analysis for commodity project investment and production; portfolio allocation including commodities; forecasting in commodity markets; corporate finance for commodity-exposed corporations; econometric/statistical analysis of commodity markets; organization of commodity markets; regulation of commodity markets; local and global commodity trading; and commodity supply chains. Commodity markets in this context are energy markets (including renewables), metal markets, mineral markets, agricultural markets, livestock and fish markets, markets for weather derivatives, emission markets, shipping markets, water, and related markets. This interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary journal will cover all commodity markets and is thus relevant for a broad audience. Commodity markets are not only of academic interest but also highly relevant for many practitioners, including asset managers, industrial managers, investment bankers, risk managers, and also policymakers in governments, central banks, and supranational institutions.