Elissa El Khawli, Anita C Keller, Susan Reh, Susanne Scheibe
{"title":"为了相处而压抑:对工作中压抑的社会动机的一生描述。","authors":"Elissa El Khawli, Anita C Keller, Susan Reh, Susanne Scheibe","doi":"10.1007/s11031-025-10146-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expressive suppression, an emotion regulation strategy that entails hiding one's feelings, is commonly used to deal with interpersonal stressors at work, despite its negative relationship with affective well-being. To understand the context around suppression at work, we adopted a motivated, situational emotion regulation perspective to investigate the motives and context of suppression use at work. In a daily diary study, we investigated the effects of experienced incivility, in concert with daily communion and status motives, in predicting suppression at work. Drawing on lifespan theories, we also addressed between-person differences in communion and status motives by investigating how age relates to these motives via two theoretically established developmental goal orientations - growth and maintenance. Data were analyzed from 291 participants who participated in a daily diary study with three daily measurements for 15 working days (3,159 daily records). At the within-person level, incivility and communion motives both predicted use of suppression. Status motives did not relate to suppression, nor did either motive interact with experienced incivility to predict suppression. At the between-person level, age was indirectly negatively related to status and communion motives via lower growth orientation. Our findings offer insights into how daily motives influence emotion regulation strategy use, as well as how age and developmental goal orientations relate to these motives at the inter-person level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48282,"journal":{"name":"Motivation and Emotion","volume":"49 6","pages":"701-716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12638333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suppress to get along: a lifespan account of social motives for suppression at work.\",\"authors\":\"Elissa El Khawli, Anita C Keller, Susan Reh, Susanne Scheibe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11031-025-10146-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Expressive suppression, an emotion regulation strategy that entails hiding one's feelings, is commonly used to deal with interpersonal stressors at work, despite its negative relationship with affective well-being. To understand the context around suppression at work, we adopted a motivated, situational emotion regulation perspective to investigate the motives and context of suppression use at work. In a daily diary study, we investigated the effects of experienced incivility, in concert with daily communion and status motives, in predicting suppression at work. Drawing on lifespan theories, we also addressed between-person differences in communion and status motives by investigating how age relates to these motives via two theoretically established developmental goal orientations - growth and maintenance. Data were analyzed from 291 participants who participated in a daily diary study with three daily measurements for 15 working days (3,159 daily records). At the within-person level, incivility and communion motives both predicted use of suppression. Status motives did not relate to suppression, nor did either motive interact with experienced incivility to predict suppression. At the between-person level, age was indirectly negatively related to status and communion motives via lower growth orientation. Our findings offer insights into how daily motives influence emotion regulation strategy use, as well as how age and developmental goal orientations relate to these motives at the inter-person level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"volume\":\"49 6\",\"pages\":\"701-716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12638333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motivation and Emotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-025-10146-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motivation and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-025-10146-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Suppress to get along: a lifespan account of social motives for suppression at work.
Expressive suppression, an emotion regulation strategy that entails hiding one's feelings, is commonly used to deal with interpersonal stressors at work, despite its negative relationship with affective well-being. To understand the context around suppression at work, we adopted a motivated, situational emotion regulation perspective to investigate the motives and context of suppression use at work. In a daily diary study, we investigated the effects of experienced incivility, in concert with daily communion and status motives, in predicting suppression at work. Drawing on lifespan theories, we also addressed between-person differences in communion and status motives by investigating how age relates to these motives via two theoretically established developmental goal orientations - growth and maintenance. Data were analyzed from 291 participants who participated in a daily diary study with three daily measurements for 15 working days (3,159 daily records). At the within-person level, incivility and communion motives both predicted use of suppression. Status motives did not relate to suppression, nor did either motive interact with experienced incivility to predict suppression. At the between-person level, age was indirectly negatively related to status and communion motives via lower growth orientation. Our findings offer insights into how daily motives influence emotion regulation strategy use, as well as how age and developmental goal orientations relate to these motives at the inter-person level.
期刊介绍:
Motivation and Emotion publishes articles on human motivational and emotional phenomena that make theoretical advances by linking empirical findings to underlying processes. Submissions should focus on key problems in motivation and emotion, and, if using non-human participants, should contribute to theories concerning human behavior. Articles should be explanatory rather than merely descriptive, providing the data necessary to understand the origins of motivation and emotion, to explicate why, how, and under what conditions motivational and emotional states change, and to document that these processes are important to human functioning.A range of methodological approaches are welcome, with methodological rigor as the key criterion. Manuscripts that rely exclusively on self-report data are appropriate, but published articles tend to be those that rely on objective measures (e.g., behavioral observations, psychophysiological responses, reaction times, brain activity, and performance or achievement indicators) either singly or combination with self-report data.The journal generally does not publish scale development and validation articles. However, it is open to articles that focus on the post-validation contribution that a new measure can make. Scale development and validation work therefore may be submitted if it is used as a necessary prerequisite to follow-up studies that demonstrate the importance of the new scale in making a theoretical advance.