ACGME/AOA单一认证体系合并对PM&R申请和匹配率的影响:2012 - 2024年分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Abigail Joy Garcia, Nikola Dragojlovic, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
{"title":"ACGME/AOA单一认证体系合并对PM&R申请和匹配率的影响:2012 - 2024年分析","authors":"Abigail Joy Garcia, Nikola Dragojlovic, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess whether the 2020 ACGME/AOA Single Accreditation System merger affected the proportion of osteopathic and allopathic students applying and matching into physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using publicly available Association of American Medical Colleges and National Resident Matching Program data from 2012 to 2024, this retrospective study analyzed (1) the physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion out of the total pool of allopathic or osteopathic students entering the match for any specialty and (2) the match share of allopathic and osteopathic residents among all physical medicine and rehabilitation matches. Linear regression compared premerger (2012-2019 applications; 2014-2020 matches) and postmerger (2020-2023 applications; 2021-2024 matches) trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion of osteopathic students declined premerger (slope = -0.11) and rose postmerger (0.19). Allopathic application proportions remained stable premerger and increased slightly postmerger. Allopathic match share decreased premerger (-0.41) but increased postmerger (0.77), while osteopathic match share rose faster premerger (1.44) than postmerger (0.57). None of these slope changes reached significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the single accreditation system merger, there was an increase in osteopathic application proportions, and allopathic match share rebounded while osteopathic gains slowed. These trends suggest the merger influenced application and match dynamics but coincided with other shifts in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"396-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education/ American Osteopathic Association Single Accreditation System Merger on PM&R Applications and Match Rates: An Analysis From 2012 to 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail Joy Garcia, Nikola Dragojlovic, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to assess whether the 2020 ACGME/AOA Single Accreditation System merger affected the proportion of osteopathic and allopathic students applying and matching into physical medicine and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using publicly available Association of American Medical Colleges and National Resident Matching Program data from 2012 to 2024, this retrospective study analyzed (1) the physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion out of the total pool of allopathic or osteopathic students entering the match for any specialty and (2) the match share of allopathic and osteopathic residents among all physical medicine and rehabilitation matches. Linear regression compared premerger (2012-2019 applications; 2014-2020 matches) and postmerger (2020-2023 applications; 2021-2024 matches) trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion of osteopathic students declined premerger (slope = -0.11) and rose postmerger (0.19). Allopathic application proportions remained stable premerger and increased slightly postmerger. Allopathic match share decreased premerger (-0.41) but increased postmerger (0.77), while osteopathic match share rose faster premerger (1.44) than postmerger (0.57). None of these slope changes reached significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following the single accreditation system merger, there was an increase in osteopathic application proportions, and allopathic match share rebounded while osteopathic gains slowed. These trends suggest the merger influenced application and match dynamics but coincided with other shifts in medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"396-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002887\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估2020年ACGME/AOA单一认证体系(SAS)合并是否影响骨科(DO)和对抗疗法(MD)学生申请和匹配物理医学与康复(PM&R)专业的比例。设计:利用2012-2024年公开的AAMC和NRMP数据,本回顾性研究分析了(1)进入任何专业匹配的医学博士或医学博士学生总数中,医学博士和医学博士的申请比例;(2)医学博士和医学博士在所有医学博士和医学博士匹配中的比例。线性回归比较了合并前(2012-2019年申请;2014-2020年比赛)和合并后(2020-2023年申请;2021-2024年比赛)的趋势。结果:DO学生的PM&R应用比例在合并前下降(斜率= -0.11),合并后上升(斜率= 0.19)。MD应用比例在合并前保持稳定,合并后略有增加。MD匹配份额在合并前下降(-0.41),合并后上升(0.77),而DO匹配份额在合并前(1.44)比合并后(0.57)增长更快。这些坡度变化都不显著。结论:SAS合并后,DO应用比例增加,MD匹配份额反弹,而DO增长放缓。这些趋势表明,合并影响了应用和匹配动态,但与医学教育的其他变化相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education/ American Osteopathic Association Single Accreditation System Merger on PM&R Applications and Match Rates: An Analysis From 2012 to 2024.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess whether the 2020 ACGME/AOA Single Accreditation System merger affected the proportion of osteopathic and allopathic students applying and matching into physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Design: Using publicly available Association of American Medical Colleges and National Resident Matching Program data from 2012 to 2024, this retrospective study analyzed (1) the physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion out of the total pool of allopathic or osteopathic students entering the match for any specialty and (2) the match share of allopathic and osteopathic residents among all physical medicine and rehabilitation matches. Linear regression compared premerger (2012-2019 applications; 2014-2020 matches) and postmerger (2020-2023 applications; 2021-2024 matches) trends.

Results: The physical medicine and rehabilitation application proportion of osteopathic students declined premerger (slope = -0.11) and rose postmerger (0.19). Allopathic application proportions remained stable premerger and increased slightly postmerger. Allopathic match share decreased premerger (-0.41) but increased postmerger (0.77), while osteopathic match share rose faster premerger (1.44) than postmerger (0.57). None of these slope changes reached significance.

Conclusions: Following the single accreditation system merger, there was an increase in osteopathic application proportions, and allopathic match share rebounded while osteopathic gains slowed. These trends suggest the merger influenced application and match dynamics but coincided with other shifts in medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书