加沙大屠杀后生物伦理学的可信度。

IF 2.3 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-09-12 Epub Date: 2025-11-13 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70052
Maide Barış, Hossein Dabbagh, Mohammad Sharif Razai, Mehmet İnanç Özekmekçi, Arianne Shahvisi
{"title":"加沙大屠杀后生物伦理学的可信度。","authors":"Maide Barış,&nbsp;Hossein Dabbagh,&nbsp;Mohammad Sharif Razai,&nbsp;Mehmet İnanç Özekmekçi,&nbsp;Arianne Shahvisi","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Between October 2023 and January 2025, the Israeli military's sustained attacks on Gaza resulted in an estimated 186,000 deaths and the systematic destruction of healthcare infrastructure. Despite the professed commitment to human dignity, justice, and the minimization of suffering within bioethics, major institutions and scholars in the field have largely remained silent or selectively engaged with the crisis. This paper argues that the Gaza genocide exposes a deeper crisis within bioethics: its growing detachment from urgent, real-world ethical challenges. Such detachment erodes public trust and raises fundamental questions about the discipline's relevance and credibility. The article interrogates the possible reasons and motivations for the silence and disengagement in the face of genocide in Gaza, and examines the institutional and disciplinary responsibilities that bioethics bears in response to health-destroying state violence. Framing the inaction as a moral failure with far-reaching implications, the article proposes alternative routes of ethical engagement and outlines steps toward a more inclusive and responsive bioethics. It calls for the urgent reorientation of the field toward a justice-driven, politically conscious practice capable of confronting today's most pressing ethical issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"40 8","pages":"784-792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bioe.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Credibility of Bioethics After the Gaza Genocide\",\"authors\":\"Maide Barış,&nbsp;Hossein Dabbagh,&nbsp;Mohammad Sharif Razai,&nbsp;Mehmet İnanç Özekmekçi,&nbsp;Arianne Shahvisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bioe.70052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Between October 2023 and January 2025, the Israeli military's sustained attacks on Gaza resulted in an estimated 186,000 deaths and the systematic destruction of healthcare infrastructure. Despite the professed commitment to human dignity, justice, and the minimization of suffering within bioethics, major institutions and scholars in the field have largely remained silent or selectively engaged with the crisis. This paper argues that the Gaza genocide exposes a deeper crisis within bioethics: its growing detachment from urgent, real-world ethical challenges. Such detachment erodes public trust and raises fundamental questions about the discipline's relevance and credibility. The article interrogates the possible reasons and motivations for the silence and disengagement in the face of genocide in Gaza, and examines the institutional and disciplinary responsibilities that bioethics bears in response to health-destroying state violence. Framing the inaction as a moral failure with far-reaching implications, the article proposes alternative routes of ethical engagement and outlines steps toward a more inclusive and responsive bioethics. It calls for the urgent reorientation of the field toward a justice-driven, politically conscious practice capable of confronting today's most pressing ethical issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"40 8\",\"pages\":\"784-792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bioe.70052\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.70052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2023年10月至2025年1月期间,以色列军队对加沙的持续攻击估计造成186 000人死亡,并有系统地破坏保健基础设施。尽管生物伦理学宣称要维护人的尊严、正义和尽量减少痛苦,但该领域的主要机构和学者在很大程度上保持沉默,或者有选择地参与这场危机。本文认为,加沙大屠杀暴露了生物伦理学中更深层次的危机:它越来越脱离紧迫的、现实世界的伦理挑战。这种疏离侵蚀了公众的信任,并对这门学科的相关性和可信度提出了根本性的质疑。本文探讨了面对加沙的种族灭绝而保持沉默和脱离接触的可能原因和动机,并探讨了生物伦理学在应对破坏健康的国家暴力方面所承担的制度和纪律责任。文章将不作为视为具有深远影响的道德失败,提出了伦理参与的替代途径,并概述了迈向更具包容性和响应性的生物伦理学的步骤。它要求该领域的紧急重新定位,以正义为导向,具有政治意识的实践能够面对当今最紧迫的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Credibility of Bioethics After the Gaza Genocide

Between October 2023 and January 2025, the Israeli military's sustained attacks on Gaza resulted in an estimated 186,000 deaths and the systematic destruction of healthcare infrastructure. Despite the professed commitment to human dignity, justice, and the minimization of suffering within bioethics, major institutions and scholars in the field have largely remained silent or selectively engaged with the crisis. This paper argues that the Gaza genocide exposes a deeper crisis within bioethics: its growing detachment from urgent, real-world ethical challenges. Such detachment erodes public trust and raises fundamental questions about the discipline's relevance and credibility. The article interrogates the possible reasons and motivations for the silence and disengagement in the face of genocide in Gaza, and examines the institutional and disciplinary responsibilities that bioethics bears in response to health-destroying state violence. Framing the inaction as a moral failure with far-reaching implications, the article proposes alternative routes of ethical engagement and outlines steps toward a more inclusive and responsive bioethics. It calls for the urgent reorientation of the field toward a justice-driven, politically conscious practice capable of confronting today's most pressing ethical issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书