Megan J Heise, C M McGhee, Kristina R Olson, Susan A Gelman, Natalie M Gallagher
{"title":"评估青少年和成人性别和社会性别的修订两步评估的可靠性。","authors":"Megan J Heise, C M McGhee, Kristina R Olson, Susan A Gelman, Natalie M Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2025.2575304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the reliability of an updated two-step measure of gender and sex. Gender diverse youths (<i>n</i> = 610, <i>Mean</i> <sub>age</sub> = 15 years, <i>SD</i> = 2) and their parents (<i>n</i> = 606, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 48, <i>SD</i> = 5) completed a measure of sex and gender twice with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. Reliability was high, with 95% or higher agreement for sex and gender for both parents and youths. Reliability was highest for parents and for cisgender and transgender boys and girls, slightly lower for nonbinary youths, and lowest for youths who selected other options (e.g., \"I don't know\"). The two-step measure showed high levels of convergent validity as well. Results demonstrate that the two-step assessment with updated response options reliably identified participants' sex and gender, and these responses could be combined to classify gender modality, including to identify transgender individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12582384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the reliability of a revised two-step assessment of sex and gender in adolescents and adults.\",\"authors\":\"Megan J Heise, C M McGhee, Kristina R Olson, Susan A Gelman, Natalie M Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645579.2025.2575304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study assessed the reliability of an updated two-step measure of gender and sex. Gender diverse youths (<i>n</i> = 610, <i>Mean</i> <sub>age</sub> = 15 years, <i>SD</i> = 2) and their parents (<i>n</i> = 606, <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 48, <i>SD</i> = 5) completed a measure of sex and gender twice with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. Reliability was high, with 95% or higher agreement for sex and gender for both parents and youths. Reliability was highest for parents and for cisgender and transgender boys and girls, slightly lower for nonbinary youths, and lowest for youths who selected other options (e.g., \\\"I don't know\\\"). The two-step measure showed high levels of convergent validity as well. Results demonstrate that the two-step assessment with updated response options reliably identified participants' sex and gender, and these responses could be combined to classify gender modality, including to identify transgender individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12582384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2575304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2575304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the reliability of a revised two-step assessment of sex and gender in adolescents and adults.
This study assessed the reliability of an updated two-step measure of gender and sex. Gender diverse youths (n = 610, Meanage = 15 years, SD = 2) and their parents (n = 606, Mage = 48, SD = 5) completed a measure of sex and gender twice with a time delay of 30-60 minutes. Reliability was high, with 95% or higher agreement for sex and gender for both parents and youths. Reliability was highest for parents and for cisgender and transgender boys and girls, slightly lower for nonbinary youths, and lowest for youths who selected other options (e.g., "I don't know"). The two-step measure showed high levels of convergent validity as well. Results demonstrate that the two-step assessment with updated response options reliably identified participants' sex and gender, and these responses could be combined to classify gender modality, including to identify transgender individuals.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
