Christopher Nemeh, Goeto Dantes, Caitlin Cain-Trivette, Kathryn Steklac, Nicholas Schmoke, Hilary R Jessup, Darina Kirilina, Paul Kurlansky, Caleb Varner, Michael Brewer, Eunice Clark, William Middlesworth, Allison F Linden, Eva W Cheung
{"title":"两个大容量中心的儿科体外膜氧合(ECMO)备用经验。","authors":"Christopher Nemeh, Goeto Dantes, Caitlin Cain-Trivette, Kathryn Steklac, Nicholas Schmoke, Hilary R Jessup, Darina Kirilina, Paul Kurlansky, Caleb Varner, Michael Brewer, Eunice Clark, William Middlesworth, Allison F Linden, Eva W Cheung","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide an option for high-risk procedures that may result in cardiopulmonary collapse. The indications for ECMO standby are not well delineated. We describe the experiences of pediatric ECMO standby at two high-volume centers. A retrospective review of pediatric ECMO standby from 2016 to 2023 was performed (n = 394). Data regarding the locations of ECMO standby and the types of procedures were obtained. The primary outcome evaluated was requiring ECMO cannulation during standby. Of the 394 pediatric patients, only 8 (2%) required ECMO cannulation during standby. The indications for ECMO standby were cardiac (84%) and respiratory (16%) complications. Standby locations included the cardiac catheterization suite (55.6%), the operating room (OR) (20.6%), the intensive care unit (ICU) (11.9%), and the interventional radiology (IR) suite (11.9%). Standby within the cardiac catheterization suite included diagnostic only (53%) and interventional (47%), of which 0 and 4 (3.9%) patients required ECMO, respectively. Procedures in OR, IR, or ICU consisted of major surgical procedures (14%), minimally invasive minor procedures (64%), intubations (18%), and transfers/births (4%). Few ECMO standby patients require cannulation; however, it is complicated to predict patient decompensation. Further studies are warranted to delineate which patients would benefit from ECMO standby while balancing cost and resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"786-791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience With Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Standby at Two High-Volume Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Nemeh, Goeto Dantes, Caitlin Cain-Trivette, Kathryn Steklac, Nicholas Schmoke, Hilary R Jessup, Darina Kirilina, Paul Kurlansky, Caleb Varner, Michael Brewer, Eunice Clark, William Middlesworth, Allison F Linden, Eva W Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide an option for high-risk procedures that may result in cardiopulmonary collapse. The indications for ECMO standby are not well delineated. We describe the experiences of pediatric ECMO standby at two high-volume centers. A retrospective review of pediatric ECMO standby from 2016 to 2023 was performed (n = 394). Data regarding the locations of ECMO standby and the types of procedures were obtained. The primary outcome evaluated was requiring ECMO cannulation during standby. Of the 394 pediatric patients, only 8 (2%) required ECMO cannulation during standby. The indications for ECMO standby were cardiac (84%) and respiratory (16%) complications. Standby locations included the cardiac catheterization suite (55.6%), the operating room (OR) (20.6%), the intensive care unit (ICU) (11.9%), and the interventional radiology (IR) suite (11.9%). Standby within the cardiac catheterization suite included diagnostic only (53%) and interventional (47%), of which 0 and 4 (3.9%) patients required ECMO, respectively. Procedures in OR, IR, or ICU consisted of major surgical procedures (14%), minimally invasive minor procedures (64%), intubations (18%), and transfers/births (4%). Few ECMO standby patients require cannulation; however, it is complicated to predict patient decompensation. Further studies are warranted to delineate which patients would benefit from ECMO standby while balancing cost and resource utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"786-791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experience With Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Standby at Two High-Volume Centers.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide an option for high-risk procedures that may result in cardiopulmonary collapse. The indications for ECMO standby are not well delineated. We describe the experiences of pediatric ECMO standby at two high-volume centers. A retrospective review of pediatric ECMO standby from 2016 to 2023 was performed (n = 394). Data regarding the locations of ECMO standby and the types of procedures were obtained. The primary outcome evaluated was requiring ECMO cannulation during standby. Of the 394 pediatric patients, only 8 (2%) required ECMO cannulation during standby. The indications for ECMO standby were cardiac (84%) and respiratory (16%) complications. Standby locations included the cardiac catheterization suite (55.6%), the operating room (OR) (20.6%), the intensive care unit (ICU) (11.9%), and the interventional radiology (IR) suite (11.9%). Standby within the cardiac catheterization suite included diagnostic only (53%) and interventional (47%), of which 0 and 4 (3.9%) patients required ECMO, respectively. Procedures in OR, IR, or ICU consisted of major surgical procedures (14%), minimally invasive minor procedures (64%), intubations (18%), and transfers/births (4%). Few ECMO standby patients require cannulation; however, it is complicated to predict patient decompensation. Further studies are warranted to delineate which patients would benefit from ECMO standby while balancing cost and resource utilization.
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.