评估牙齿年龄估计的主观性:在四种建立良好的第三磨牙评估方法中,内部和内部观察者的可靠性。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Rizky Merdietio Boedi, Ademir Franco, Nikita Polukhin, Akiko Kumagai, Ivan Galic, Jeta Kelmendi, Israel Soriano Vázquez, Sang-Seob Lee, Galina Zolotenkova, Roberto Scendoni, Stefano De Luca
{"title":"评估牙齿年龄估计的主观性:在四种建立良好的第三磨牙评估方法中,内部和内部观察者的可靠性。","authors":"Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Rizky Merdietio Boedi, Ademir Franco, Nikita Polukhin, Akiko Kumagai, Ivan Galic, Jeta Kelmendi, Israel Soriano Vázquez, Sang-Seob Lee, Galina Zolotenkova, Roberto Scendoni, Stefano De Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03616-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In forensic contexts, age assessments constitute matters of substantial legalconsequence, particularly in proceedings involving children and young adolescents. Dental age estimation (DAE) techniques are widely used for this purpose, especially in cases involving undocumented minors. This study assesses intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well-established DAE methods: Gleiser and Hunt Modified by Köhler (GHK), Demirjian (DEM), Kullman (KUL), and Cameriere's Third Molar Maturity Index (I3M). A total of 50 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 14-23.99 years were analyzed by nine qualified forensic experts. The observers assessed the development stages of third molars using the three staging methods (GHK, DEM, KUL) and measured the I3M using Cameriere's metric approach. Primarily, the quantitative assessment for analyzing the agreement was Cohen's Kappa, Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (AC1) and (AC2), and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Statistical analysis revealed high intra-observer reliability for all methods, with coefficient values indicating strong agreement among individual observers. In terms of inter-observer reliability, the I3M achieved the highest agreement (ICC 0.986), followed by DEM (AC2 0.918), GHK (AC2 0.914), and KUL (AC2 0.868). Notably, maxillary third molars consistently showed lower inter-observer agreement than mandibular third molars, particularly when assessed using the DEM and GHK methods. The highest inter-observer agreement in cases where a tooth could not be staged or measured was observed for the KUL method (AC1 0.993), followed by I3M (AC1 0.988), with DEM and GHK, demonstrating equivalent levels of agreement (AC1 0.954). All of the tested methods yielded highly reliable results, especially DEM and GHK. The choice of a staging method should be guided by the specific objectives of each study. Moreover, while the I3M method demonstrated high reliability values, obtaining identical repeated measurements was nearly impossible due to its metric approach..</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing subjectivity in dental age estimation: intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well established third molar evaluation methods.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Rizky Merdietio Boedi, Ademir Franco, Nikita Polukhin, Akiko Kumagai, Ivan Galic, Jeta Kelmendi, Israel Soriano Vázquez, Sang-Seob Lee, Galina Zolotenkova, Roberto Scendoni, Stefano De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00414-025-03616-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In forensic contexts, age assessments constitute matters of substantial legalconsequence, particularly in proceedings involving children and young adolescents. Dental age estimation (DAE) techniques are widely used for this purpose, especially in cases involving undocumented minors. This study assesses intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well-established DAE methods: Gleiser and Hunt Modified by Köhler (GHK), Demirjian (DEM), Kullman (KUL), and Cameriere's Third Molar Maturity Index (I3M). A total of 50 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 14-23.99 years were analyzed by nine qualified forensic experts. The observers assessed the development stages of third molars using the three staging methods (GHK, DEM, KUL) and measured the I3M using Cameriere's metric approach. Primarily, the quantitative assessment for analyzing the agreement was Cohen's Kappa, Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (AC1) and (AC2), and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Statistical analysis revealed high intra-observer reliability for all methods, with coefficient values indicating strong agreement among individual observers. In terms of inter-observer reliability, the I3M achieved the highest agreement (ICC 0.986), followed by DEM (AC2 0.918), GHK (AC2 0.914), and KUL (AC2 0.868). Notably, maxillary third molars consistently showed lower inter-observer agreement than mandibular third molars, particularly when assessed using the DEM and GHK methods. The highest inter-observer agreement in cases where a tooth could not be staged or measured was observed for the KUL method (AC1 0.993), followed by I3M (AC1 0.988), with DEM and GHK, demonstrating equivalent levels of agreement (AC1 0.954). All of the tested methods yielded highly reliable results, especially DEM and GHK. The choice of a staging method should be guided by the specific objectives of each study. Moreover, while the I3M method demonstrated high reliability values, obtaining identical repeated measurements was nearly impossible due to its metric approach..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03616-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03616-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法医环境中,年龄评估构成具有重大法律后果的事项,特别是在涉及儿童和青少年的诉讼中。牙齿年龄估计(DAE)技术被广泛用于这一目的,特别是在涉及无证未成年人的情况下。本研究评估了四种成熟的DAE方法的观察者内部和观察者之间的可靠性:Gleiser和Hunt,由Köhler (GHK)、Demirjian (DEM)、Kullman (KUL)和Cameriere的第三磨牙成熟度指数(I3M)修正。由9名合格的法医专家对年龄在14-23.99岁的50张全景x线片进行分析。观察人员使用三种分期方法(GHK, DEM, KUL)评估第三磨牙的发育阶段,并使用Cameriere的度量方法测量I3M。分析一致性的定量评估主要是Cohen’s Kappa、Gwet’s agreement Coefficient (AC1)和(AC2)以及class内相关系数(ICC)。统计分析显示,所有方法的观察者内部信度都很高,系数值表明观察者之间的一致性很强。在观察者间信度方面,I3M的一致性最高(ICC 0.986),其次是DEM (AC2 0.918)、GHK (AC2 0.914)和KUL (AC2 0.868)。值得注意的是,上颌第三磨牙的观察者间一致性低于下颌第三磨牙,特别是在使用DEM和GHK方法评估时。在无法分级或测量牙齿的情况下,KUL方法观察到的观察者间一致性最高(AC1 0.993),其次是I3M (AC1 0.988), DEM和GHK显示出相同的一致性水平(AC1 0.954)。所有的测试方法都获得了高可靠性的结果,特别是DEM和GHK。分期方法的选择应以每项研究的具体目标为指导。此外,虽然I3M方法显示出高可靠性值,但由于其度量方法,几乎不可能获得相同的重复测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing subjectivity in dental age estimation: intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well established third molar evaluation methods.

In forensic contexts, age assessments constitute matters of substantial legalconsequence, particularly in proceedings involving children and young adolescents. Dental age estimation (DAE) techniques are widely used for this purpose, especially in cases involving undocumented minors. This study assesses intra- and inter-observer reliability across four well-established DAE methods: Gleiser and Hunt Modified by Köhler (GHK), Demirjian (DEM), Kullman (KUL), and Cameriere's Third Molar Maturity Index (I3M). A total of 50 panoramic radiographs from individuals aged 14-23.99 years were analyzed by nine qualified forensic experts. The observers assessed the development stages of third molars using the three staging methods (GHK, DEM, KUL) and measured the I3M using Cameriere's metric approach. Primarily, the quantitative assessment for analyzing the agreement was Cohen's Kappa, Gwet's Agreement Coefficient (AC1) and (AC2), and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Statistical analysis revealed high intra-observer reliability for all methods, with coefficient values indicating strong agreement among individual observers. In terms of inter-observer reliability, the I3M achieved the highest agreement (ICC 0.986), followed by DEM (AC2 0.918), GHK (AC2 0.914), and KUL (AC2 0.868). Notably, maxillary third molars consistently showed lower inter-observer agreement than mandibular third molars, particularly when assessed using the DEM and GHK methods. The highest inter-observer agreement in cases where a tooth could not be staged or measured was observed for the KUL method (AC1 0.993), followed by I3M (AC1 0.988), with DEM and GHK, demonstrating equivalent levels of agreement (AC1 0.954). All of the tested methods yielded highly reliable results, especially DEM and GHK. The choice of a staging method should be guided by the specific objectives of each study. Moreover, while the I3M method demonstrated high reliability values, obtaining identical repeated measurements was nearly impossible due to its metric approach..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信