Cristina Taliento, Pantaleo Greco, Giulia Bruni, Ina Marie Dueholm Hjorth, An Coosemans, Wouter Froyman, Dirk Timmerman, John Charles Rotondo, Chiara Mazziotta, Martina Arcieri, Stefano Restaino, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Carlotta Giorgi, Lars Dyrskjøt, Paolo Pinton, Giampaolo Morciano
{"title":"循环肿瘤DNA在卵巢癌诊断中的应用综述。","authors":"Cristina Taliento, Pantaleo Greco, Giulia Bruni, Ina Marie Dueholm Hjorth, An Coosemans, Wouter Froyman, Dirk Timmerman, John Charles Rotondo, Chiara Mazziotta, Martina Arcieri, Stefano Restaino, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Carlotta Giorgi, Lars Dyrskjøt, Paolo Pinton, Giampaolo Morciano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains a leading cause of gynecologic cancer mortality worldwide, largely due to late-stage diagnosis and limited early detection tools. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy through detection of tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA in detecting OC compared to healthy controls or benign conditions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases through April 2024, including studies that assessed sensitivity, specificity of ctDNA assays in plasma or serum samples. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024590089.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, employing a variety of molecular techniques including polymerase chain reaction-based methylation assays (73.7%) and sequencing methods (whole genome sequencing/next-generation sequencing) (21%), targeting single genes or multi-gene panels. Diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA varied, with sensitivity (40.6%-94.7%) and specificity (56%-100%) ranging broadly, but often outperforming CA125, particularly in early-stage. Concordance between ctDNA and tumor tissue ranged from moderate (r = 0.428) to strong (r = 0.771).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis, narrative synthesis suggests that ctDNA may offer an improved early detection capability over CA125, through methylation and copy number variation analyses. Further controlled prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA as a complementary tool in OC detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"102686"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating tumor DNA in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Taliento, Pantaleo Greco, Giulia Bruni, Ina Marie Dueholm Hjorth, An Coosemans, Wouter Froyman, Dirk Timmerman, John Charles Rotondo, Chiara Mazziotta, Martina Arcieri, Stefano Restaino, Francesco Multinu, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Carlotta Giorgi, Lars Dyrskjøt, Paolo Pinton, Giampaolo Morciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ovarian cancer (OC) remains a leading cause of gynecologic cancer mortality worldwide, largely due to late-stage diagnosis and limited early detection tools. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy through detection of tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA in detecting OC compared to healthy controls or benign conditions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases through April 2024, including studies that assessed sensitivity, specificity of ctDNA assays in plasma or serum samples. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024590089.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, employing a variety of molecular techniques including polymerase chain reaction-based methylation assays (73.7%) and sequencing methods (whole genome sequencing/next-generation sequencing) (21%), targeting single genes or multi-gene panels. Diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA varied, with sensitivity (40.6%-94.7%) and specificity (56%-100%) ranging broadly, but often outperforming CA125, particularly in early-stage. Concordance between ctDNA and tumor tissue ranged from moderate (r = 0.428) to strong (r = 0.771).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis, narrative synthesis suggests that ctDNA may offer an improved early detection capability over CA125, through methylation and copy number variation analyses. Further controlled prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA as a complementary tool in OC detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102686\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:卵巢癌(OC)仍然是全球妇科癌症死亡的主要原因,主要是由于晚期诊断和有限的早期检测工具。循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)已成为一种很有前途的非侵入性生物标志物,有可能通过检测肿瘤特异性遗传和表观遗传改变来提高诊断准确性。方法:本系统综述旨在评价ctDNA检测卵巢癌的准确性,并与健康对照或良性对照进行比较。到2024年4月,我们在PubMed、Web of Science和EBSCO数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,包括评估血浆或血清样本中ctDNA检测的敏感性和特异性的研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具评估偏倚风险。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024590089。结果:19项研究符合纳入标准,采用多种分子技术,包括基于聚合酶链反应的甲基化测定(73.7%)和测序方法(全基因组测序/下一代测序)(21%),针对单基因或多基因面板。ctDNA的诊断准确性各不相同,其敏感性(40.6%-94.7%)和特异性(56%-100%)范围很广,但通常优于CA125,特别是在早期。ctDNA与肿瘤组织的一致性从中度(r = 0.428)到强(r = 0.771)不等。结论:尽管研究间的异质性排除了荟萃分析,但叙述性综合表明,通过甲基化和拷贝数变异分析,ctDNA可能比CA125提供更好的早期检测能力。需要进一步的前瞻性对照研究来验证ctDNA作为卵巢癌检测补充工具的临床应用。
Circulating tumor DNA in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a systematic review.
Objective: Ovarian cancer (OC) remains a leading cause of gynecologic cancer mortality worldwide, largely due to late-stage diagnosis and limited early detection tools. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy through detection of tumor-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations.
Methods: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA in detecting OC compared to healthy controls or benign conditions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases through April 2024, including studies that assessed sensitivity, specificity of ctDNA assays in plasma or serum samples. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024590089.
Results: Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, employing a variety of molecular techniques including polymerase chain reaction-based methylation assays (73.7%) and sequencing methods (whole genome sequencing/next-generation sequencing) (21%), targeting single genes or multi-gene panels. Diagnostic accuracy of ctDNA varied, with sensitivity (40.6%-94.7%) and specificity (56%-100%) ranging broadly, but often outperforming CA125, particularly in early-stage. Concordance between ctDNA and tumor tissue ranged from moderate (r = 0.428) to strong (r = 0.771).
Conclusions: Although heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis, narrative synthesis suggests that ctDNA may offer an improved early detection capability over CA125, through methylation and copy number variation analyses. Further controlled prospective studies are needed to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA as a complementary tool in OC detection.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.