中国对非洲COVID-19援助:趋势及其对未来大流行防范的影响

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia Hudson, Raghav Venkataramani, Sailor Miao, Julius N Odhiambo
{"title":"中国对非洲COVID-19援助:趋势及其对未来大流行防范的影响","authors":"Julia Hudson, Raghav Venkataramani, Sailor Miao, Julius N Odhiambo","doi":"10.1186/s12992-025-01153-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic underfunding of pandemic preparedness remains a critical weakness in global health security. Without sustained, strategic investment, the world risks repeating the reactive approaches of past crises. This study examines the modes of COVID-19 aid delivered by the Chinese government across African countries and regions, offering a nuanced understanding of China's operational role in pandemic response. In doing so, it contributes to the global health assistance literature by providing a more comprehensive view of China's involvement in the prevention, treatment, and control of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 727 Chinese health-related project commitments to African countries indicates that the majority targeted the provision of personal protective equipment (43.33%), followed by diagnostic and medical equipment (26%), and vaccination initiatives (17.88%). Regionally, Southern Africa received the highest average number of projects per country, while Northern Africa received the lowest. At the national level, South Africa (5.09%), Zimbabwe (4.00%), and Cameroon (3.85%) accounted for the largest shares of total projects, whereas Eritrea (0.001%), Cabo Verde (0.004%), and Somalia (0.004%) received the smallest proportions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research reveals the growing significance of Chinese aid in the global health agenda through its active role in combating COVID-19 across the African continent. It also highlights emerging trends and suggests potential adjustments needed in pandemic financing strategies for more effective future efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China's COVID-19 aid in Africa: trends and implications for future pandemic preparedness.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Hudson, Raghav Venkataramani, Sailor Miao, Julius N Odhiambo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12992-025-01153-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic underfunding of pandemic preparedness remains a critical weakness in global health security. Without sustained, strategic investment, the world risks repeating the reactive approaches of past crises. This study examines the modes of COVID-19 aid delivered by the Chinese government across African countries and regions, offering a nuanced understanding of China's operational role in pandemic response. In doing so, it contributes to the global health assistance literature by providing a more comprehensive view of China's involvement in the prevention, treatment, and control of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 727 Chinese health-related project commitments to African countries indicates that the majority targeted the provision of personal protective equipment (43.33%), followed by diagnostic and medical equipment (26%), and vaccination initiatives (17.88%). Regionally, Southern Africa received the highest average number of projects per country, while Northern Africa received the lowest. At the national level, South Africa (5.09%), Zimbabwe (4.00%), and Cameroon (3.85%) accounted for the largest shares of total projects, whereas Eritrea (0.001%), Cabo Verde (0.004%), and Somalia (0.004%) received the smallest proportions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research reveals the growing significance of Chinese aid in the global health agenda through its active role in combating COVID-19 across the African continent. It also highlights emerging trends and suggests potential adjustments needed in pandemic financing strategies for more effective future efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Globalization and Health\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Globalization and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01153-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01153-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大流行防范的长期资金不足仍然是全球卫生安全的一个严重弱点。如果没有持续的战略投资,世界就有可能重蹈过去危机中被动应对的覆辙。本研究考察了中国政府在非洲国家和地区提供的COVID-19援助模式,为中国在大流行应对中的运作作用提供了细致入微的理解。通过这样做,它通过更全面地了解中国参与COVID-19的预防、治疗和控制,为全球卫生援助文献做出了贡献。结果:对中国向非洲国家提供的727个卫生相关项目承诺的分析表明,大多数是提供个人防护装备(43.33%),其次是诊断和医疗设备(26%),以及疫苗接种行动(17.88%)。从区域来看,南部非洲每个国家获得的平均项目数量最多,而北部非洲获得的项目数量最少。在国家层面,南非(5.09%)、津巴布韦(4.00%)和喀麦隆(3.85%)占总项目的最大份额,而厄立特里亚(0.001%)、佛得角(0.004%)和索马里(0.004%)所占比例最小。结论:本研究揭示了中国援助在全球卫生议程中日益重要的作用,中国援助在整个非洲大陆抗击COVID-19方面发挥了积极作用。报告还强调了新出现的趋势,并提出了大流行筹资战略中可能需要进行的调整,以使今后的努力更加有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
China's COVID-19 aid in Africa: trends and implications for future pandemic preparedness.

Background: Chronic underfunding of pandemic preparedness remains a critical weakness in global health security. Without sustained, strategic investment, the world risks repeating the reactive approaches of past crises. This study examines the modes of COVID-19 aid delivered by the Chinese government across African countries and regions, offering a nuanced understanding of China's operational role in pandemic response. In doing so, it contributes to the global health assistance literature by providing a more comprehensive view of China's involvement in the prevention, treatment, and control of COVID-19.

Results: Analysis of 727 Chinese health-related project commitments to African countries indicates that the majority targeted the provision of personal protective equipment (43.33%), followed by diagnostic and medical equipment (26%), and vaccination initiatives (17.88%). Regionally, Southern Africa received the highest average number of projects per country, while Northern Africa received the lowest. At the national level, South Africa (5.09%), Zimbabwe (4.00%), and Cameroon (3.85%) accounted for the largest shares of total projects, whereas Eritrea (0.001%), Cabo Verde (0.004%), and Somalia (0.004%) received the smallest proportions.

Conclusions: This research reveals the growing significance of Chinese aid in the global health agenda through its active role in combating COVID-19 across the African continent. It also highlights emerging trends and suggests potential adjustments needed in pandemic financing strategies for more effective future efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信