Idylla KRAS突变检测在生理盐水和细胞溶解液中细针抽吸的验证:与配对的FFPE肿瘤样本的比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Aida Molero, Pilar Ortega de la Obra, Mónica Mate, Purificación Manzanares
{"title":"Idylla KRAS突变检测在生理盐水和细胞溶解液中细针抽吸的验证:与配对的FFPE肿瘤样本的比较。","authors":"Aida Molero, Pilar Ortega de la Obra, Mónica Mate, Purificación Manzanares","doi":"10.1002/dc.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular testing on FNA rinses offers a simple, minimally invasive, and cost-effective alternative to tissue biopsies. Among clinically relevant biomarkers, KRAS mutations are key in guiding targeted therapy across several cancer types. The fully automated Idylla platform provides rapid analysis directly from FFPE samples, without DNA extraction. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of applying the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test to FNA needle rinses collected in saline and Cytolyt. We analyzed 30 FNA rinses from resection specimens of 27 colorectal adenocarcinomas and three pancreatic adenocarcinomas (simulated FNAs). All 30 rinses were collected in saline, and 18 were additionally collected in Cytolyt without Preservcyt transfer. After cytospin preparation to assess cellularity and tumor percentage, the rinse was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min to obtain a pellet. A 50 μL aliquot of the pellet was directly loaded into the Idylla cartridge. Results from all rinses were compared with the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test on the corresponding FFPE tumor tissue. KRAS mutations were consistently detected in FNA rinses, with no false negatives or false positives observed. A single case, a saline rinse, was misclassified by the automated variant caller (reported as Q61K instead of the true G12D). However, amplification curve review confirmed a clear G12D, while the Q61K signal was aberrant. The Idylla KRAS Mutation Test can be reliably applied to FNA needle rinses in both saline and Cytolyt, yielding robust results in samples with high tumor content. Nevertheless, careful review of amplification curve patterns is essential in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test on Fine-Needle Aspiration Needle Rinses in Saline and Cytolyt Solution Without DNA Extraction: A Comparison With Paired FFPE Tumor Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Aida Molero, Pilar Ortega de la Obra, Mónica Mate, Purificación Manzanares\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Molecular testing on FNA rinses offers a simple, minimally invasive, and cost-effective alternative to tissue biopsies. Among clinically relevant biomarkers, KRAS mutations are key in guiding targeted therapy across several cancer types. The fully automated Idylla platform provides rapid analysis directly from FFPE samples, without DNA extraction. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of applying the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test to FNA needle rinses collected in saline and Cytolyt. We analyzed 30 FNA rinses from resection specimens of 27 colorectal adenocarcinomas and three pancreatic adenocarcinomas (simulated FNAs). All 30 rinses were collected in saline, and 18 were additionally collected in Cytolyt without Preservcyt transfer. After cytospin preparation to assess cellularity and tumor percentage, the rinse was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min to obtain a pellet. A 50 μL aliquot of the pellet was directly loaded into the Idylla cartridge. Results from all rinses were compared with the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test on the corresponding FFPE tumor tissue. KRAS mutations were consistently detected in FNA rinses, with no false negatives or false positives observed. A single case, a saline rinse, was misclassified by the automated variant caller (reported as Q61K instead of the true G12D). However, amplification curve review confirmed a clear G12D, while the Q61K signal was aberrant. The Idylla KRAS Mutation Test can be reliably applied to FNA needle rinses in both saline and Cytolyt, yielding robust results in samples with high tumor content. Nevertheless, careful review of amplification curve patterns is essential in this setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.70039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FNA冲洗液的分子检测提供了一种简单、微创、成本效益高的组织活检替代方法。在临床相关的生物标志物中,KRAS突变是指导几种癌症类型靶向治疗的关键。全自动的Idylla平台可直接对FFPE样品进行快速分析,无需提取DNA。在本研究中,我们评估了将Idylla KRAS突变试验应用于生理盐水和细胞液中收集的FNA针冲洗液的可行性。我们分析了27例结直肠腺癌和3例胰腺腺癌(模拟FNA)切除标本中的30个FNA冲洗液。所有30次冲洗均在生理盐水中收集,另外18次在没有保存细胞转移的细胞液中收集。在细胞自旋制备以评估细胞和肿瘤百分比后,漂洗液以2500 rpm离心5分钟以获得颗粒。将50 μL的微球直接装入Idylla药筒中。将所有冲洗结果与相应FFPE肿瘤组织的Idylla KRAS突变试验结果进行比较。在FNA冲洗液中一致检测到KRAS突变,未观察到假阴性或假阳性。一个单独的病例,生理盐水冲洗,被自动变异调用者错误分类(报告为Q61K而不是真正的G12D)。然而,放大曲线复查证实G12D信号清晰,而Q61K信号异常。Idylla KRAS突变试验可以可靠地应用于生理盐水和细胞液中的FNA针冲洗,在肿瘤含量高的样品中产生可靠的结果。然而,在这种情况下,仔细审查放大曲线模式是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test on Fine-Needle Aspiration Needle Rinses in Saline and Cytolyt Solution Without DNA Extraction: A Comparison With Paired FFPE Tumor Samples.

Molecular testing on FNA rinses offers a simple, minimally invasive, and cost-effective alternative to tissue biopsies. Among clinically relevant biomarkers, KRAS mutations are key in guiding targeted therapy across several cancer types. The fully automated Idylla platform provides rapid analysis directly from FFPE samples, without DNA extraction. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of applying the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test to FNA needle rinses collected in saline and Cytolyt. We analyzed 30 FNA rinses from resection specimens of 27 colorectal adenocarcinomas and three pancreatic adenocarcinomas (simulated FNAs). All 30 rinses were collected in saline, and 18 were additionally collected in Cytolyt without Preservcyt transfer. After cytospin preparation to assess cellularity and tumor percentage, the rinse was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min to obtain a pellet. A 50 μL aliquot of the pellet was directly loaded into the Idylla cartridge. Results from all rinses were compared with the Idylla KRAS Mutation Test on the corresponding FFPE tumor tissue. KRAS mutations were consistently detected in FNA rinses, with no false negatives or false positives observed. A single case, a saline rinse, was misclassified by the automated variant caller (reported as Q61K instead of the true G12D). However, amplification curve review confirmed a clear G12D, while the Q61K signal was aberrant. The Idylla KRAS Mutation Test can be reliably applied to FNA needle rinses in both saline and Cytolyt, yielding robust results in samples with high tumor content. Nevertheless, careful review of amplification curve patterns is essential in this setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信