东亚育龄患者自体乳房再造术的比较:深动脉穿支皮瓣与腹壁下深穿支皮瓣。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ryohei Ishiura, Makoto Shiraishi, Kohei Mitsui, Kanako Danno, Kento Hosomi, Chihena Hansini Banda, Mitsunaga Narushima
{"title":"东亚育龄患者自体乳房再造术的比较:深动脉穿支皮瓣与腹壁下深穿支皮瓣。","authors":"Ryohei Ishiura, Makoto Shiraishi, Kohei Mitsui, Kanako Danno, Kento Hosomi, Chihena Hansini Banda, Mitsunaga Narushima","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction in East Asian Patients of Childbearing Age: Profunda Artery Perforator Flap versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.\",\"authors\":\"Ryohei Ishiura, Makoto Shiraishi, Kohei Mitsui, Kanako Danno, Kento Hosomi, Chihena Hansini Banda, Mitsunaga Narushima\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:东亚育龄患者的体重指数(BMI)相对较低,乳房较紧。本研究的目的是比较DIEP皮瓣和PAP皮瓣在这些人群中的自体乳房重建。方法:对连续28例患者进行回顾性分析。分析患者年龄、BMI、侧位、扩张期、手术类型、手术时间、乳房切除术切除体积、皮瓣切除体积、皮瓣体积、皮瓣血管直径、住院天数、术后早期并发症及后期翻修手术。结果:手术包括9例DIEP重建和21例PAP皮瓣重建。DIEP组和PAP组的平均年龄分别为45.6±3.80岁和43.5±5.05岁(p = 0.27)。DIEP组和PAP组的平均BMI分别为22.7±2.56和20.0±1.82 (p)。结论:PAP瓣为大多数东亚育龄患者的自体乳房重建提供了足够的体积。证据等级iv:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction in East Asian Patients of Childbearing Age: Profunda Artery Perforator Flap versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.

Background: East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.

Methods: A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.

Results: The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信