{"title":"东亚育龄患者自体乳房再造术的比较:深动脉穿支皮瓣与腹壁下深穿支皮瓣。","authors":"Ryohei Ishiura, Makoto Shiraishi, Kohei Mitsui, Kanako Danno, Kento Hosomi, Chihena Hansini Banda, Mitsunaga Narushima","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction in East Asian Patients of Childbearing Age: Profunda Artery Perforator Flap versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.\",\"authors\":\"Ryohei Ishiura, Makoto Shiraishi, Kohei Mitsui, Kanako Danno, Kento Hosomi, Chihena Hansini Banda, Mitsunaga Narushima\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05339-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction in East Asian Patients of Childbearing Age: Profunda Artery Perforator Flap versus Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap.
Background: East Asian patients of childbearing age have relatively lower body mass index (BMI) and tighter breasts than Western patients have. The aim of this study was to compare autologous breast reconstruction between the DIEP flap and PAP flap in these populations.
Methods: A total of 28 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patient age, BMI, laterality, expansion period, type of operation, operation time, resection volume in mastectomy, harvested flap volume, flap volume, flap vessel diameters, inpatient days, early postoperative complications, and late revision surgeries were analyzed.
Results: The surgical procedures included nine DIEP reconstructions and 21 PAP flap reconstructions. The average age of the subjects in the DIEP and PAP flap populations was 45.6 ± 3.80 and 43.5 ± 5.05, respectively (p = 0.27). Their average BMI of DIEP and PAP flap population was 22.7 ± 2.56 and 20.0 ± 1.82, respectively (p < 0.05). According to the perioperative characteristics, harvested flap volume and transferred flap volume in DIEP flap were greater than those in PAP flap significantly (553.6 ± 169.0 g vs 261.0 ± 69.5 g, p < 0.01; 434.6 ± 170.0 g vs 238.9 ± 62.6 g, p < 0.01, respectively). In the transferred flap volume/BMI index ratio, DIEP was significantly higher than PAP significantly (19.4 ± 6.99 g vs 12.2 ± 2.70 g, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The PAP flap provides enough volume for autologous breast reconstruction in most East Asian patients of childbearing age.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.