2017年SALT上限减少了慈善捐款:来自990表格数据的证据

IF 3.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sara LaLumia
{"title":"2017年SALT上限减少了慈善捐款:来自990表格数据的证据","authors":"Sara LaLumia","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) included provisions that reduce the share of filers who itemize deductions, raising the net-of-tax price of gifts to charity. Two such provisions are the near-doubling of the standard deduction and the introduction of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local tax (SALT) payments. The effects of these provisions on taxpayer behavior were not uniform across geographic areas. In locations with initially low state and local taxes, where the $10,000 cap is not binding for many taxpayers, there were small declines in itemization rates. Areas with initially high SALT payments saw larger declines in itemization. This paper makes use of geographic variation to investigate whether TCJA provisions affected gifts received by charitable organizations. Analyzing organization-level data from IRS Form 990, I find that charitable organizations located in counties where the SALT cap is most binding experienced a 1.5 % relative decline in contributions after the tax change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economics","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2017 SALT cap reduced charitable contributions: Evidence from form 990 data\",\"authors\":\"Sara LaLumia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) included provisions that reduce the share of filers who itemize deductions, raising the net-of-tax price of gifts to charity. Two such provisions are the near-doubling of the standard deduction and the introduction of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local tax (SALT) payments. The effects of these provisions on taxpayer behavior were not uniform across geographic areas. In locations with initially low state and local taxes, where the $10,000 cap is not binding for many taxpayers, there were small declines in itemization rates. Areas with initially high SALT payments saw larger declines in itemization. This paper makes use of geographic variation to investigate whether TCJA provisions affected gifts received by charitable organizations. Analyzing organization-level data from IRS Form 990, I find that charitable organizations located in counties where the SALT cap is most binding experienced a 1.5 % relative decline in contributions after the tax change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Economics\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105498\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725001963\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272725001963","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《减税与就业法案》(Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, TCJA)包括了一些条款,这些条款减少了逐项列出扣除项目的申报者所占的比例,从而提高了捐赠给慈善机构的净税价格。其中两项条款是将标准扣除额提高近一倍,以及对州和地方税(SALT)支付的扣除额设定1万美元的上限。这些规定对纳税人行为的影响在不同地理区域并不统一。在最初州税和地方税较低的地区,10,000美元的上限对许多纳税人没有约束力,逐项税率略有下降。最初SALT支付较高的地区的逐项分配下降幅度较大。本文利用地理差异来考察TCJA条款是否会影响慈善组织收到的捐赠。分析IRS表格990的组织层面数据,我发现,在SALT上限最具约束力的县,慈善组织在税收变化后的捐款相对下降了1.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2017 SALT cap reduced charitable contributions: Evidence from form 990 data
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) included provisions that reduce the share of filers who itemize deductions, raising the net-of-tax price of gifts to charity. Two such provisions are the near-doubling of the standard deduction and the introduction of a $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local tax (SALT) payments. The effects of these provisions on taxpayer behavior were not uniform across geographic areas. In locations with initially low state and local taxes, where the $10,000 cap is not binding for many taxpayers, there were small declines in itemization rates. Areas with initially high SALT payments saw larger declines in itemization. This paper makes use of geographic variation to investigate whether TCJA provisions affected gifts received by charitable organizations. Analyzing organization-level data from IRS Form 990, I find that charitable organizations located in counties where the SALT cap is most binding experienced a 1.5 % relative decline in contributions after the tax change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Economics aims to promote original scientific research in the field of public economics, focusing on the utilization of contemporary economic theory and quantitative analysis methodologies. It serves as a platform for the international scholarly community to engage in discussions on public policy matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信