可持续的电子学习?对工人来说,这是昙花一现,还是持久的变化

Kuang-Hsien Wang
{"title":"可持续的电子学习?对工人来说,这是昙花一现,还是持久的变化","authors":"Kuang-Hsien Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2025.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This quantitative, observational, quasi-experimental inquiry analyzes the intertemporal e-learning behaviors of full-time workers in Taiwan using nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey data. Methodologically, the analysis links three waves of Taiwan’s Digital Development Survey (2019 = 5706; 2022 = 6860; 2023 = 7116) to a two-period, two-group Difference-in-Differences (DID) estimator and embeds the survey’s perceived-usefulness and ease-of-use items in a temporal-contingency extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). By integrating the TAM with the DID method, the study reveals a substantial surge in e-learning demand during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this demand quickly reverted to pre-pandemic levels after the pandemic, indicating that e-learning primarily functioned as an emergency response rather than instigating a long-term shift in workers' learning behaviors. This pattern holds consistently across workers from various industries and skill levels. The study provides empirical validation for the TAM framework in exogenous shocks, emphasizing the significant roles of perceived usefulness and ease of use in shaping workers' e-learning behaviors. Additionally, it contributes to the literature by offering insights into the heterogeneous demand for e-learning across different skill levels and industries. The findings highlight the short-term volatility of e-learning demand in response to external shocks, extending the theoretical understanding of e-learning behaviors during unforeseen events. These results have important implications for policymakers, suggesting that strategies to promote the long-term normalization of e-learning should address its inherent volatility and focus on fostering sustained engagement beyond crisis-driven adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable E-learning? A flash in the pan or a lasting change for workers\",\"authors\":\"Kuang-Hsien Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wds.2025.100258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This quantitative, observational, quasi-experimental inquiry analyzes the intertemporal e-learning behaviors of full-time workers in Taiwan using nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey data. Methodologically, the analysis links three waves of Taiwan’s Digital Development Survey (2019 = 5706; 2022 = 6860; 2023 = 7116) to a two-period, two-group Difference-in-Differences (DID) estimator and embeds the survey’s perceived-usefulness and ease-of-use items in a temporal-contingency extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). By integrating the TAM with the DID method, the study reveals a substantial surge in e-learning demand during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this demand quickly reverted to pre-pandemic levels after the pandemic, indicating that e-learning primarily functioned as an emergency response rather than instigating a long-term shift in workers' learning behaviors. This pattern holds consistently across workers from various industries and skill levels. The study provides empirical validation for the TAM framework in exogenous shocks, emphasizing the significant roles of perceived usefulness and ease of use in shaping workers' e-learning behaviors. Additionally, it contributes to the literature by offering insights into the heterogeneous demand for e-learning across different skill levels and industries. The findings highlight the short-term volatility of e-learning demand in response to external shocks, extending the theoretical understanding of e-learning behaviors during unforeseen events. These results have important implications for policymakers, suggesting that strategies to promote the long-term normalization of e-learning should address its inherent volatility and focus on fostering sustained engagement beyond crisis-driven adoption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X25000564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X25000564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用具有全国代表性的重复横断面调查数据,分析台湾全职工作者的跨期电子学习行为。在方法上,分析将台湾数位发展调查的三波(2019 = 5706;2022 = 6860;2023 = 7116)与两期、两组差异中的差异(DID)估计器联系起来,并将调查的感知有用性和易用性项目嵌入到技术接受模型(TAM)的时间-应变扩展中。通过将TAM与DID方法相结合,该研究显示,在COVID-19大流行高峰期,电子学习需求大幅增加。然而,这种需求在大流行之后迅速恢复到大流行前的水平,这表明电子学习主要是作为一种应急反应,而不是促使工人学习行为的长期转变。这种模式在不同行业和技能水平的工人中都是一致的。本研究为外生冲击下的TAM框架提供了实证验证,强调了感知有用性和易用性在塑造员工电子学习行为中的重要作用。此外,它还提供了不同技能水平和行业对电子学习的异质需求的见解,从而为文献做出了贡献。研究结果强调了电子学习需求在应对外部冲击时的短期波动,扩展了对不可预见事件下电子学习行为的理论理解。这些结果对政策制定者具有重要意义,表明促进电子学习长期正常化的战略应解决其固有的波动性,并侧重于在危机驱动的采用之外促进持续参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable E-learning? A flash in the pan or a lasting change for workers
This quantitative, observational, quasi-experimental inquiry analyzes the intertemporal e-learning behaviors of full-time workers in Taiwan using nationally representative, repeated cross-sectional survey data. Methodologically, the analysis links three waves of Taiwan’s Digital Development Survey (2019 = 5706; 2022 = 6860; 2023 = 7116) to a two-period, two-group Difference-in-Differences (DID) estimator and embeds the survey’s perceived-usefulness and ease-of-use items in a temporal-contingency extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). By integrating the TAM with the DID method, the study reveals a substantial surge in e-learning demand during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this demand quickly reverted to pre-pandemic levels after the pandemic, indicating that e-learning primarily functioned as an emergency response rather than instigating a long-term shift in workers' learning behaviors. This pattern holds consistently across workers from various industries and skill levels. The study provides empirical validation for the TAM framework in exogenous shocks, emphasizing the significant roles of perceived usefulness and ease of use in shaping workers' e-learning behaviors. Additionally, it contributes to the literature by offering insights into the heterogeneous demand for e-learning across different skill levels and industries. The findings highlight the short-term volatility of e-learning demand in response to external shocks, extending the theoretical understanding of e-learning behaviors during unforeseen events. These results have important implications for policymakers, suggesting that strategies to promote the long-term normalization of e-learning should address its inherent volatility and focus on fostering sustained engagement beyond crisis-driven adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信