额叶区和执行功能测试:脑损伤患者显示的可疑关联。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroSci Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI:10.3390/neurosci6040105
Demis Basso, Ida Bosio, Vincenza Tarantino, Francesco Carabba
{"title":"额叶区和执行功能测试:脑损伤患者显示的可疑关联。","authors":"Demis Basso, Ida Bosio, Vincenza Tarantino, Francesco Carabba","doi":"10.3390/neurosci6040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its introduction, the construct of executive functions (EFs) has been associated with a set of tests to assess these functions and a brain network centered in the associative frontal brain regions. While the majority of perspectives have endorsed these associations, some studies have started casting doubts on them. In this article, the association between the construct of EFs, the tests used to assess them, and the involvement of frontal regions is examined. A sample of 28 patients with brain injuries was divided into three subgroups according to the region of the injury (anterior, posterior, antero-posterior). Patients were assessed with a battery of tests, including 25 measures of EFs and 6 control measures. A series of regression models revealed no significant differences in performance across the three groups. Findings indicate that the EF tests are not specific enough to differentiate EFs and brain injuries. The alleged reference of EFs to the frontal areas of the brain should attribute a higher role to other associative areas. The present study provides recommendations about how the EFs concept could be improved through methodological refinements and/or its dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":74294,"journal":{"name":"NeuroSci","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frontal Regions and Executive Function Testing: A Doubted Association Shown by Brain-Injured Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Demis Basso, Ida Bosio, Vincenza Tarantino, Francesco Carabba\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/neurosci6040105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since its introduction, the construct of executive functions (EFs) has been associated with a set of tests to assess these functions and a brain network centered in the associative frontal brain regions. While the majority of perspectives have endorsed these associations, some studies have started casting doubts on them. In this article, the association between the construct of EFs, the tests used to assess them, and the involvement of frontal regions is examined. A sample of 28 patients with brain injuries was divided into three subgroups according to the region of the injury (anterior, posterior, antero-posterior). Patients were assessed with a battery of tests, including 25 measures of EFs and 6 control measures. A series of regression models revealed no significant differences in performance across the three groups. Findings indicate that the EF tests are not specific enough to differentiate EFs and brain injuries. The alleged reference of EFs to the frontal areas of the brain should attribute a higher role to other associative areas. The present study provides recommendations about how the EFs concept could be improved through methodological refinements and/or its dissemination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroSci\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550954/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroSci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6040105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

执行功能(EFs)的结构自引入以来,一直与一系列评估这些功能的测试和以大脑联合额叶区域为中心的大脑网络联系在一起。虽然大多数观点支持这些关联,但一些研究开始对它们提出质疑。在这篇文章中,研究了电磁场的结构、用于评估它们的测试和额叶区域的参与之间的联系。选取28例脑损伤患者,根据损伤部位(前、后、前后)分为3个亚组。通过一系列测试对患者进行评估,包括25项EFs测量和6项对照测量。一系列回归模型显示,三组学生的表现没有显著差异。研究结果表明,EF测试不足以特异性区分EF和脑损伤。所谓的脑电波与大脑额叶区的关联应该归因于其他相关区域的更高作用。本研究就如何通过改进方法和(或)传播环境基金概念提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frontal Regions and Executive Function Testing: A Doubted Association Shown by Brain-Injured Patients.

Since its introduction, the construct of executive functions (EFs) has been associated with a set of tests to assess these functions and a brain network centered in the associative frontal brain regions. While the majority of perspectives have endorsed these associations, some studies have started casting doubts on them. In this article, the association between the construct of EFs, the tests used to assess them, and the involvement of frontal regions is examined. A sample of 28 patients with brain injuries was divided into three subgroups according to the region of the injury (anterior, posterior, antero-posterior). Patients were assessed with a battery of tests, including 25 measures of EFs and 6 control measures. A series of regression models revealed no significant differences in performance across the three groups. Findings indicate that the EF tests are not specific enough to differentiate EFs and brain injuries. The alleged reference of EFs to the frontal areas of the brain should attribute a higher role to other associative areas. The present study provides recommendations about how the EFs concept could be improved through methodological refinements and/or its dissemination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信