成人及其儿童的疫苗接种:来自调查和实验数据的见解。

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yiting Guo, Yan Peng, Lijia Wei
{"title":"成人及其儿童的疫苗接种:来自调查和实验数据的见解。","authors":"Yiting Guo, Yan Peng, Lijia Wei","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination for adults and their children: insights from survey and experimental data.\",\"authors\":\"Yiting Guo, Yan Peng, Lijia Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗被广泛认为是预防疾病最有效和最有效的战略之一。本研究基于两波公众调查数据,并辅以激励实验,调查了行为偏好如何影响接受COVID-19疫苗接种的实际决定。通过这些方法的结合,研究旨在提高内部效度和外部效度。我们的研究结果表明,亲社会水平较高的个体更倾向于接种初始剂量的疫苗,这一模式在普通公众和大学生中都适用。相比之下,父母关于儿童疫苗接种的决定与更大的风险承担和更低的遗漏偏见显著相关,但与亲社会偏好无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccination for adults and their children: insights from survey and experimental data.

Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信