{"title":"成人及其儿童的疫苗接种:来自调查和实验数据的见解。","authors":"Yiting Guo, Yan Peng, Lijia Wei","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination for adults and their children: insights from survey and experimental data.\",\"authors\":\"Yiting Guo, Yan Peng, Lijia Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00685-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vaccination for adults and their children: insights from survey and experimental data.
Vaccines are widely acknowledged as one of the most efficient and effective strategies for preventing diseases. This study, based on two waves of public survey data and complemented by incentivized experiments, investigates how behavioral preferences shape actual decisions to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. By combining these methods, the research aims to enhance both internal and external validity. Our findings indicate that individuals with elevated levels of prosociality show a greater propensity to receive the initial dose of the vaccine, a pattern that holds across both the general public and university students. In contrast, parental decisions regarding child vaccination are significantly associated with greater risk taking and lower omission bias, but not with prosocial preferences.
期刊介绍:
Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.