光学和屈光手术中大语言模型的比较评估:多项选择题的表现。

IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine
Leah Attal, Elad Shvartz, Alon Gorenshtein, Shirley Pincovich, Daniel Bahir
{"title":"光学和屈光手术中大语言模型的比较评估:多项选择题的表现。","authors":"Leah Attal, Elad Shvartz, Alon Gorenshtein, Shirley Pincovich, Daniel Bahir","doi":"10.3390/vision9040085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven advanced AI Large Language Models (LLMs)-ChatGPT 4o, ChatGPT O3 Mini, ChatGPT O1, DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Grok-3-in answering multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in optics and refractive surgery, to assess their role in medical education for residents. The AI models were tested using 134 publicly available MCQs from national ophthalmology certification exams, categorized by the need to perform calculations, the relevant subspecialty, and the use of images. Accuracy was analyzed and compared statistically. ChatGPT O1 achieved the highest overall accuracy (83.5%), excelling in complex optical calculations (84.1%) and optics questions (82.4%). DeepSeek V3 displayed superior accuracy in refractive surgery-related questions (89.7%), followed by ChatGPT O3 Mini (88.4%). ChatGPT O3 Mini significantly outperformed others in image analysis, with 88.2% accuracy. Moreover, ChatGPT O1 demonstrated comparable accuracy rates for both calculated and non-calculated questions (84.1% vs. 83.3%). This is in stark contrast to other models, which exhibited significant discrepancies in accuracy for calculated and non-calculated questions. The findings highlight the ability of LLMs to achieve high accuracy in ophthalmology MCQs, particularly in complex optical calculations and visual items. These results suggest potential applications in exam preparation and medical training contexts, while underscoring the need for future studies designed to directly evaluate their role and impact in medical education. The findings highlight the significant potential of AI models in ophthalmology education, particularly in performing complex optical calculations and visual stem questions. Future studies should utilize larger, multilingual datasets to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of Large Language Models in Optics and Refractive Surgery: Performance on Multiple-Choice Questions.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Attal, Elad Shvartz, Alon Gorenshtein, Shirley Pincovich, Daniel Bahir\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vision9040085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven advanced AI Large Language Models (LLMs)-ChatGPT 4o, ChatGPT O3 Mini, ChatGPT O1, DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Grok-3-in answering multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in optics and refractive surgery, to assess their role in medical education for residents. The AI models were tested using 134 publicly available MCQs from national ophthalmology certification exams, categorized by the need to perform calculations, the relevant subspecialty, and the use of images. Accuracy was analyzed and compared statistically. ChatGPT O1 achieved the highest overall accuracy (83.5%), excelling in complex optical calculations (84.1%) and optics questions (82.4%). DeepSeek V3 displayed superior accuracy in refractive surgery-related questions (89.7%), followed by ChatGPT O3 Mini (88.4%). ChatGPT O3 Mini significantly outperformed others in image analysis, with 88.2% accuracy. Moreover, ChatGPT O1 demonstrated comparable accuracy rates for both calculated and non-calculated questions (84.1% vs. 83.3%). This is in stark contrast to other models, which exhibited significant discrepancies in accuracy for calculated and non-calculated questions. The findings highlight the ability of LLMs to achieve high accuracy in ophthalmology MCQs, particularly in complex optical calculations and visual items. These results suggest potential applications in exam preparation and medical training contexts, while underscoring the need for future studies designed to directly evaluate their role and impact in medical education. The findings highlight the significant potential of AI models in ophthalmology education, particularly in performing complex optical calculations and visual stem questions. Future studies should utilize larger, multilingual datasets to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9040085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9040085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估七个先进的人工智能大型语言模型(llm)——ChatGPT 40、ChatGPT O3 Mini、ChatGPT O1、DeepSeek V3、DeepSeek R1、Gemini 2.0 Flash和grok -3在光学和屈光手术中回答多项选择题(mcq)的性能,以评估它们在住院医师医学教育中的作用。人工智能模型使用来自国家眼科认证考试的134个公开mcq进行测试,根据执行计算的需要、相关的亚专业和图像的使用进行分类。对准确度进行分析和统计比较。ChatGPT 01获得了最高的总体精度(83.5%),在复杂光学计算(84.1%)和光学问题(82.4%)方面表现出色。DeepSeek V3在屈光手术相关问题上的准确率更高(89.7%),其次是ChatGPT O3 Mini(88.4%)。ChatGPT O3 Mini在图像分析方面明显优于其他产品,准确率为88.2%。此外,ChatGPT 01对计算题和非计算题的准确率相当(84.1%对83.3%)。这与其他模型形成鲜明对比,这些模型在计算问题和非计算问题的准确性上表现出显著差异。研究结果强调了llm在眼科mcq中实现高精度的能力,特别是在复杂的光学计算和视觉项目中。这些结果提示了在考试准备和医学培训背景下的潜在应用,同时强调了未来研究的必要性,旨在直接评估它们在医学教育中的作用和影响。研究结果强调了人工智能模型在眼科教育中的巨大潜力,特别是在执行复杂的光学计算和视觉系统问题方面。未来的研究应该利用更大的、多语言的数据集来证实和扩展这些初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative Assessment of Large Language Models in Optics and Refractive Surgery: Performance on Multiple-Choice Questions.

Comparative Assessment of Large Language Models in Optics and Refractive Surgery: Performance on Multiple-Choice Questions.

Comparative Assessment of Large Language Models in Optics and Refractive Surgery: Performance on Multiple-Choice Questions.

Comparative Assessment of Large Language Models in Optics and Refractive Surgery: Performance on Multiple-Choice Questions.

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of seven advanced AI Large Language Models (LLMs)-ChatGPT 4o, ChatGPT O3 Mini, ChatGPT O1, DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Grok-3-in answering multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in optics and refractive surgery, to assess their role in medical education for residents. The AI models were tested using 134 publicly available MCQs from national ophthalmology certification exams, categorized by the need to perform calculations, the relevant subspecialty, and the use of images. Accuracy was analyzed and compared statistically. ChatGPT O1 achieved the highest overall accuracy (83.5%), excelling in complex optical calculations (84.1%) and optics questions (82.4%). DeepSeek V3 displayed superior accuracy in refractive surgery-related questions (89.7%), followed by ChatGPT O3 Mini (88.4%). ChatGPT O3 Mini significantly outperformed others in image analysis, with 88.2% accuracy. Moreover, ChatGPT O1 demonstrated comparable accuracy rates for both calculated and non-calculated questions (84.1% vs. 83.3%). This is in stark contrast to other models, which exhibited significant discrepancies in accuracy for calculated and non-calculated questions. The findings highlight the ability of LLMs to achieve high accuracy in ophthalmology MCQs, particularly in complex optical calculations and visual items. These results suggest potential applications in exam preparation and medical training contexts, while underscoring the need for future studies designed to directly evaluate their role and impact in medical education. The findings highlight the significant potential of AI models in ophthalmology education, particularly in performing complex optical calculations and visual stem questions. Future studies should utilize larger, multilingual datasets to confirm and extend these preliminary findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书