Chin Fen Neoh, Michelle K Yong, Leesa Rowley, Andrew W Roberts, Glen A Kennedy, Simon He, Anthony P Schwarer, Ian A Bilmon, Andrew H Wei, Monica A Slavin
{"title":"ALLG AMLM16试验中fms样酪氨酸激酶3-内串联重复(FLT3-ITD)阳性急性髓性白血病患者在初始诱导和巩固治疗期间接受索拉非尼的抗真菌预防","authors":"Chin Fen Neoh, Michelle K Yong, Leesa Rowley, Andrew W Roberts, Glen A Kennedy, Simon He, Anthony P Schwarer, Ian A Bilmon, Andrew H Wei, Monica A Slavin","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the rates of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis during initial induction and consolidation treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) plus either sorafenib or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of sorafenib or placebo in combination with intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML (ALLG AMLM16 trial), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) prophylaxis was administered at 5 mg/kg twice weekly during induction and consolidation phases in both sorafenib and placebo treatment arms. Alternative prophylaxis was allowed per institutional practice once sorafenib/placebo treatment was completed. IFD episodes, reported as either a serious adverse event or an adverse event, were adjudicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 94 patients included for analysis of IFD, four IFD episodes (one proven and three possible) were reported during the induction treatment phase. The overall rate of proven/probable/possible IFD was 4.3% (4/94), with rates of 3.1% (2/64) and 6.7% (2/30) in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. Seven patients had infusion-related reactions, and four were reported to be associated with LAMB administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMB with or without subsequent azole prophylaxis could be an alternative option for fungal prophylaxis for patients with AML in whom azoles are contraindicated or not tolerated. Sorafenib does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of IFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antifungal prophylaxis in patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive acute myeloid leukaemia receiving sorafenib during initial induction and consolidation treatment in ALLG AMLM16 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Chin Fen Neoh, Michelle K Yong, Leesa Rowley, Andrew W Roberts, Glen A Kennedy, Simon He, Anthony P Schwarer, Ian A Bilmon, Andrew H Wei, Monica A Slavin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the rates of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis during initial induction and consolidation treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) plus either sorafenib or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of sorafenib or placebo in combination with intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML (ALLG AMLM16 trial), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) prophylaxis was administered at 5 mg/kg twice weekly during induction and consolidation phases in both sorafenib and placebo treatment arms. Alternative prophylaxis was allowed per institutional practice once sorafenib/placebo treatment was completed. IFD episodes, reported as either a serious adverse event or an adverse event, were adjudicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 94 patients included for analysis of IFD, four IFD episodes (one proven and three possible) were reported during the induction treatment phase. The overall rate of proven/probable/possible IFD was 4.3% (4/94), with rates of 3.1% (2/64) and 6.7% (2/30) in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. Seven patients had infusion-related reactions, and four were reported to be associated with LAMB administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMB with or without subsequent azole prophylaxis could be an alternative option for fungal prophylaxis for patients with AML in whom azoles are contraindicated or not tolerated. Sorafenib does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of IFD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf385\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antifungal prophylaxis in patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive acute myeloid leukaemia receiving sorafenib during initial induction and consolidation treatment in ALLG AMLM16 trial.
Objectives: To report the rates of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis during initial induction and consolidation treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) plus either sorafenib or placebo.
Methods: As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of sorafenib or placebo in combination with intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML (ALLG AMLM16 trial), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) prophylaxis was administered at 5 mg/kg twice weekly during induction and consolidation phases in both sorafenib and placebo treatment arms. Alternative prophylaxis was allowed per institutional practice once sorafenib/placebo treatment was completed. IFD episodes, reported as either a serious adverse event or an adverse event, were adjudicated.
Results: Of the 94 patients included for analysis of IFD, four IFD episodes (one proven and three possible) were reported during the induction treatment phase. The overall rate of proven/probable/possible IFD was 4.3% (4/94), with rates of 3.1% (2/64) and 6.7% (2/30) in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. Seven patients had infusion-related reactions, and four were reported to be associated with LAMB administration.
Conclusions: LAMB with or without subsequent azole prophylaxis could be an alternative option for fungal prophylaxis for patients with AML in whom azoles are contraindicated or not tolerated. Sorafenib does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of IFD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.