分析社交媒体上的锂、喹硫平和丙戊酸:一项信息流行病学研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Maria Montero-Torres, Francisco J Lara-Abelenda, Julen Marin-Napal, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, Raquel Martínez-Velasco, Iñigo Alberdi-Paramo, Ana Gonzalez-Pinto, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro
{"title":"分析社交媒体上的锂、喹硫平和丙戊酸:一项信息流行病学研究。","authors":"Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Maria Montero-Torres, Francisco J Lara-Abelenda, Julen Marin-Napal, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, Raquel Martínez-Velasco, Iñigo Alberdi-Paramo, Ana Gonzalez-Pinto, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro","doi":"10.1186/s40345-025-00395-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although lithium is considered the gold standard for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD), its prescription has declined in recent decades. At the same time, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), such as quetiapine, and other mood stabilisers such as valproic acid, have been increasingly used. Social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) provide real-time insights into public and professional perceptions of these treatments, which may influence their use and adherence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To analyse how lithium, quetiapine, and valproic acid have been represented on X, by focusing on user type, engagement levels, and thematic content of tweets.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods, observational study of tweets published in English and Spanish between 2008 and 2022. Tweets containing the generic or commercial names of lithium, valproic acid, and quetiapine were retrieved and analysed using a validated codebook and semi-supervised machine-learning models. Tweets were categorised by user type and clinical and non-clinical content themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 236,797 analysed tweets, quetiapine was the most frequently mentioned drug (69.4%), followed by valproic acid (19.1%) and lithium (11.5%). Lithium tweets showed the highest engagement (54.0 likes and 18.0 retweets per tweet). Patients mainly focused on quetiapine (47.0%), while healthcare professionals more often discussed lithium (58.1%). Tweets containing clinical content were more common in English (78.0%) than in Spanish (54.7%), especially regarding side effects (53.1% vs 8.2%). Tweets on effectiveness were more frequently discussed in English (48.8%), especially for quetiapine (54.7%), but were less common in Spanish (9.8%). Discussion about drug shortages was more prevalent in Spanish tweets (31.6% vs 0.5%), particularly for valproic acid (55.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite lithium being the least mentioned drug, it generated the highest level of engagement, particularly among healthcare professionals. In contrast, quetiapine was widely mentioned by patients, which reflects a more socially widespread and, at times, problematic use. These findings highlight the value of listening to conversations on social media to better understand perceptions, concerns, and attitudes that may influence adherence and prescribing trends in mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":13944,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing lithium, quetiapine and valproic acid on social media: an infodemiology study.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Maria Montero-Torres, Francisco J Lara-Abelenda, Julen Marin-Napal, Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez, Raquel Martínez-Velasco, Iñigo Alberdi-Paramo, Ana Gonzalez-Pinto, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40345-025-00395-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although lithium is considered the gold standard for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD), its prescription has declined in recent decades. At the same time, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), such as quetiapine, and other mood stabilisers such as valproic acid, have been increasingly used. Social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) provide real-time insights into public and professional perceptions of these treatments, which may influence their use and adherence.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To analyse how lithium, quetiapine, and valproic acid have been represented on X, by focusing on user type, engagement levels, and thematic content of tweets.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods, observational study of tweets published in English and Spanish between 2008 and 2022. Tweets containing the generic or commercial names of lithium, valproic acid, and quetiapine were retrieved and analysed using a validated codebook and semi-supervised machine-learning models. Tweets were categorised by user type and clinical and non-clinical content themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 236,797 analysed tweets, quetiapine was the most frequently mentioned drug (69.4%), followed by valproic acid (19.1%) and lithium (11.5%). Lithium tweets showed the highest engagement (54.0 likes and 18.0 retweets per tweet). Patients mainly focused on quetiapine (47.0%), while healthcare professionals more often discussed lithium (58.1%). Tweets containing clinical content were more common in English (78.0%) than in Spanish (54.7%), especially regarding side effects (53.1% vs 8.2%). Tweets on effectiveness were more frequently discussed in English (48.8%), especially for quetiapine (54.7%), but were less common in Spanish (9.8%). Discussion about drug shortages was more prevalent in Spanish tweets (31.6% vs 0.5%), particularly for valproic acid (55.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite lithium being the least mentioned drug, it generated the highest level of engagement, particularly among healthcare professionals. In contrast, quetiapine was widely mentioned by patients, which reflects a more socially widespread and, at times, problematic use. These findings highlight the value of listening to conversations on social media to better understand perceptions, concerns, and attitudes that may influence adherence and prescribing trends in mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-025-00395-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-025-00395-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然锂被认为是双相情感障碍(BD)维持治疗的金标准,但近几十年来其处方已经减少。与此同时,第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs),如喹硫平,以及其他情绪稳定剂,如丙戊酸,已被越来越多地使用。X(以前的Twitter)等社交媒体平台提供了公众和专业人士对这些治疗的实时看法,这可能会影响它们的使用和依从性。目的:通过关注用户类型、参与度和推文的主题内容,分析锂、喹硫平和丙戊酸在X上的表现。方法:我们对2008年至2022年间以英语和西班牙语发布的推文进行了一项混合方法的观察性研究。包含锂、丙戊酸和喹硫平的通用或商业名称的推文被检索并使用经过验证的代码本和半监督机器学习模型进行分析。推文按用户类型、临床和非临床内容主题进行分类。结果:在分析的236797条推文中,奎硫平是被提及最多的药物(69.4%),其次是丙戊酸(19.1%)和锂(11.5%)。锂离子推文的参与度最高(每条推文54.0个赞和18.0个转发)。患者主要关注喹硫平(47.0%),而医护人员更常讨论锂(58.1%)。包含临床内容的推文用英语(78.0%)比用西班牙语(54.7%)更常见,特别是关于副作用(53.1%对8.2%)。关于有效性的推文用英语讨论的频率更高(48.8%),尤其是喹硫平(54.7%),但用西班牙语讨论的频率较低(9.8%)。关于药物短缺的讨论在西班牙语推文中更为普遍(31.6%对0.5%),特别是丙戊酸(55.8%)。结论:尽管锂是被提及最少的药物,但它产生了最高的参与度,特别是在医疗保健专业人员中。相比之下,奎硫平被患者广泛提及,这反映了一个更广泛的社会,有时,有问题的使用。这些发现强调了倾听社交媒体上的对话的价值,可以更好地理解可能影响依从性和心理健康处方趋势的看法、担忧和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing lithium, quetiapine and valproic acid on social media: an infodemiology study.

Background: Although lithium is considered the gold standard for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD), its prescription has declined in recent decades. At the same time, second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), such as quetiapine, and other mood stabilisers such as valproic acid, have been increasingly used. Social media platforms such as X (formerly Twitter) provide real-time insights into public and professional perceptions of these treatments, which may influence their use and adherence.

Aims: To analyse how lithium, quetiapine, and valproic acid have been represented on X, by focusing on user type, engagement levels, and thematic content of tweets.

Method: We conducted a mixed-methods, observational study of tweets published in English and Spanish between 2008 and 2022. Tweets containing the generic or commercial names of lithium, valproic acid, and quetiapine were retrieved and analysed using a validated codebook and semi-supervised machine-learning models. Tweets were categorised by user type and clinical and non-clinical content themes.

Results: Among the 236,797 analysed tweets, quetiapine was the most frequently mentioned drug (69.4%), followed by valproic acid (19.1%) and lithium (11.5%). Lithium tweets showed the highest engagement (54.0 likes and 18.0 retweets per tweet). Patients mainly focused on quetiapine (47.0%), while healthcare professionals more often discussed lithium (58.1%). Tweets containing clinical content were more common in English (78.0%) than in Spanish (54.7%), especially regarding side effects (53.1% vs 8.2%). Tweets on effectiveness were more frequently discussed in English (48.8%), especially for quetiapine (54.7%), but were less common in Spanish (9.8%). Discussion about drug shortages was more prevalent in Spanish tweets (31.6% vs 0.5%), particularly for valproic acid (55.8%).

Conclusions: Despite lithium being the least mentioned drug, it generated the highest level of engagement, particularly among healthcare professionals. In contrast, quetiapine was widely mentioned by patients, which reflects a more socially widespread and, at times, problematic use. These findings highlight the value of listening to conversations on social media to better understand perceptions, concerns, and attitudes that may influence adherence and prescribing trends in mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bipolar Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access online journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. It publishes contributions from the broad range of clinical, psychological and biological research in bipolar disorders. It is the official journal of the ECNP-ENBREC (European Network of Bipolar Research Expert Centres ) Bipolar Disorders Network, the International Group for the study of Lithium Treated Patients (IGSLi) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Bipolare Störungen (DGBS) and invites clinicians and researchers from around the globe to submit original research papers, short research communications, reviews, guidelines, case reports and letters to the editor that help to enhance understanding of bipolar disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信