全胰切除术后,在标准化胰岛素方案中增加连续血糖监测。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Trine Lund-Jacobsen, Sanne Emtekjær, Jan Henrik Storkholm, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Lene Ringholm, Thomas Peter Almdal
{"title":"全胰切除术后,在标准化胰岛素方案中增加连续血糖监测。","authors":"Trine Lund-Jacobsen, Sanne Emtekjær, Jan Henrik Storkholm, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Lene Ringholm, Thomas Peter Almdal","doi":"10.61409/A05250362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After total pancreatectomy (TP), patients are at high risk of hypoglycaemia regardless of insulin treatment modality. Information on treatment targets and modalities of insulin treatment following TP is sparse. This descriptive study presented experiences with a standardised insulin protocol and examined how the addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) influenced the treatment of diabetes following TP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results from two retrospective cohorts of patients who had undergone total pancreatectomy were collected, 30 patients not using isCGM served as references (operated in 2018-2019, mean age 65.4 years) for 40 patients using isCGM (operated in 2020-2021, mean age 63.3 years). An identical insulin treatment protocol was used for both cohorts. HbA1c, insulin doses, weight and episodes with severe hypoglycaemia were recorded at three, six, nine and 12 months after TP. Percentage of time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR) and time above range (TAR) were collected for isCGM users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HbA1c and insulin doses were similar in the two groups during the first year following TP. In isCGM users, TBR was 0%, TIR 43-48% and TAR 52-57%. Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were numerically but not significantly lower in isCGM users (zero versus four, p = 0.21). The same applied to days of readmittance 4.0 ± 7.7 days versus 15.5 ± 40 (p = 0.13) per patient/year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first year following TP, the use of isCGM was not associated with better glycaemic control. A non-significant trend towards less severe cases of hypoglycaemia and a nonsignificant numerical reduction in days of hospitalisation were observed in isCGM users.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous glucose monitoring added to a standardised insulin protocol following total pancreatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Trine Lund-Jacobsen, Sanne Emtekjær, Jan Henrik Storkholm, Carsten Palnæs Hansen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Lene Ringholm, Thomas Peter Almdal\",\"doi\":\"10.61409/A05250362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>After total pancreatectomy (TP), patients are at high risk of hypoglycaemia regardless of insulin treatment modality. Information on treatment targets and modalities of insulin treatment following TP is sparse. This descriptive study presented experiences with a standardised insulin protocol and examined how the addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) influenced the treatment of diabetes following TP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Results from two retrospective cohorts of patients who had undergone total pancreatectomy were collected, 30 patients not using isCGM served as references (operated in 2018-2019, mean age 65.4 years) for 40 patients using isCGM (operated in 2020-2021, mean age 63.3 years). An identical insulin treatment protocol was used for both cohorts. HbA1c, insulin doses, weight and episodes with severe hypoglycaemia were recorded at three, six, nine and 12 months after TP. Percentage of time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR) and time above range (TAR) were collected for isCGM users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HbA1c and insulin doses were similar in the two groups during the first year following TP. In isCGM users, TBR was 0%, TIR 43-48% and TAR 52-57%. Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were numerically but not significantly lower in isCGM users (zero versus four, p = 0.21). The same applied to days of readmittance 4.0 ± 7.7 days versus 15.5 ± 40 (p = 0.13) per patient/year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first year following TP, the use of isCGM was not associated with better glycaemic control. A non-significant trend towards less severe cases of hypoglycaemia and a nonsignificant numerical reduction in days of hospitalisation were observed in isCGM users.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61409/A05250362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A05250362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在全胰切除术(TP)后,无论采用何种胰岛素治疗方式,患者发生低血糖的风险都很高。关于TP后胰岛素治疗的目标和方式的信息很少。本描述性研究介绍了标准化胰岛素方案的经验,并检查了间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)的增加如何影响TP后糖尿病的治疗。方法:收集两组回顾性全胰切除术患者的结果,其中30例未行isCGM(2018-2019年,平均年龄65.4岁)作为对照,40例行isCGM(2020-2021年,平均年龄63.3岁)。两个队列使用相同的胰岛素治疗方案。在TP后3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月记录HbA1c、胰岛素剂量、体重和严重低血糖发作。收集isCGM用户低于范围的时间百分比(TBR)、在范围内的时间百分比(TIR)和超出范围的时间百分比(TAR)。结果:两组患者在TP术后第一年的糖化血红蛋白和胰岛素剂量相似。isCGM使用者的TBR为0%,TIR为43-48%,TAR为52-57%。使用isCGM的患者发生严重低血糖的次数减少,但没有显著减少(0比4,p = 0.21)。再入院天数(4.0±7.7天)与(15.5±40天)(p = 0.13) /例患者/年相同。结论:在TP后的第一年,使用isCGM与更好的血糖控制无关。在isCGM使用者中观察到低血糖不太严重的趋势和住院天数的非显著减少。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous glucose monitoring added to a standardised insulin protocol following total pancreatectomy.

Introduction: After total pancreatectomy (TP), patients are at high risk of hypoglycaemia regardless of insulin treatment modality. Information on treatment targets and modalities of insulin treatment following TP is sparse. This descriptive study presented experiences with a standardised insulin protocol and examined how the addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) influenced the treatment of diabetes following TP.

Methods: Results from two retrospective cohorts of patients who had undergone total pancreatectomy were collected, 30 patients not using isCGM served as references (operated in 2018-2019, mean age 65.4 years) for 40 patients using isCGM (operated in 2020-2021, mean age 63.3 years). An identical insulin treatment protocol was used for both cohorts. HbA1c, insulin doses, weight and episodes with severe hypoglycaemia were recorded at three, six, nine and 12 months after TP. Percentage of time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR) and time above range (TAR) were collected for isCGM users.

Results: HbA1c and insulin doses were similar in the two groups during the first year following TP. In isCGM users, TBR was 0%, TIR 43-48% and TAR 52-57%. Episodes of severe hypoglycaemia were numerically but not significantly lower in isCGM users (zero versus four, p = 0.21). The same applied to days of readmittance 4.0 ± 7.7 days versus 15.5 ± 40 (p = 0.13) per patient/year.

Conclusions: In the first year following TP, the use of isCGM was not associated with better glycaemic control. A non-significant trend towards less severe cases of hypoglycaemia and a nonsignificant numerical reduction in days of hospitalisation were observed in isCGM users.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信