{"title":"st段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后每个护理阶段的延迟对死亡率的影响。","authors":"Omid Rafizadeh, Saghar Erfani, Sobhan Zarbafti, Sahel Erfani","doi":"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely restoration of blood flow is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management. We evaluate the effects of time intervals - total ischemic time, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, delay within the healthcare system, and time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation - on in-hospital mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 315 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a hospital between 2020 and 2021. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive importance of time delay components for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total sample, 35 patients died. The median (interquartile range) for total ischemic time was 310.0 (215.0-547.5) min. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in time to first medical contact [120.0 (60.0-245.0) vs. 210.0 (120.0-272.5); P = 0.007] and total ischemic time [300.0 (210.0-531.2) vs. 370.0 (320.0-720.0); P = 0.001]; however, the multivariable model (accuracy = 0.971, sensitivity = 0.800, specificity = 0.999, and an area under the curve = 0.93) identified total ischemic time as the most important time-based predictor of mortality, followed by system delay, time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation, from symptom onset to first medical contact, and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each delay component in STEMI management carries distinct clinical consequences that necessitate targeted intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10702,"journal":{"name":"Coronary artery disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of delays at each stage of care on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Omid Rafizadeh, Saghar Erfani, Sobhan Zarbafti, Sahel Erfani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely restoration of blood flow is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management. We evaluate the effects of time intervals - total ischemic time, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, delay within the healthcare system, and time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation - on in-hospital mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 315 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a hospital between 2020 and 2021. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive importance of time delay components for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total sample, 35 patients died. The median (interquartile range) for total ischemic time was 310.0 (215.0-547.5) min. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in time to first medical contact [120.0 (60.0-245.0) vs. 210.0 (120.0-272.5); P = 0.007] and total ischemic time [300.0 (210.0-531.2) vs. 370.0 (320.0-720.0); P = 0.001]; however, the multivariable model (accuracy = 0.971, sensitivity = 0.800, specificity = 0.999, and an area under the curve = 0.93) identified total ischemic time as the most important time-based predictor of mortality, followed by system delay, time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation, from symptom onset to first medical contact, and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Each delay component in STEMI management carries distinct clinical consequences that necessitate targeted intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronary artery disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary artery disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000001578","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effects of delays at each stage of care on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Background: Timely restoration of blood flow is critical for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management. We evaluate the effects of time intervals - total ischemic time, time from symptom onset to first medical contact, delay within the healthcare system, and time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation - on in-hospital mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Methods: We analyzed data from 315 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a hospital between 2020 and 2021. A random forest model was used to assess the predictive importance of time delay components for in-hospital mortality.
Results: Of the total sample, 35 patients died. The median (interquartile range) for total ischemic time was 310.0 (215.0-547.5) min. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in time to first medical contact [120.0 (60.0-245.0) vs. 210.0 (120.0-272.5); P = 0.007] and total ischemic time [300.0 (210.0-531.2) vs. 370.0 (320.0-720.0); P = 0.001]; however, the multivariable model (accuracy = 0.971, sensitivity = 0.800, specificity = 0.999, and an area under the curve = 0.93) identified total ischemic time as the most important time-based predictor of mortality, followed by system delay, time from hospital arrival to balloon inflation, from symptom onset to first medical contact, and from arrival at the catheterization laboratory to balloon inflation.
Conclusion: Each delay component in STEMI management carries distinct clinical consequences that necessitate targeted intervention.
期刊介绍:
Coronary Artery Disease welcomes reports of original research with a clinical emphasis, including observational studies, clinical trials, translational research, novel imaging, pharmacology and interventional approaches as well as advances in laboratory research that contribute to the understanding of coronary artery disease. Each issue of Coronary Artery Disease is divided into four areas of focus: Original Research articles, Review in Depth articles by leading experts in the field, Editorials and Images in Coronary Artery Disease. The Editorials will comment on selected original research published in each issue of Coronary Artery Disease, as well as highlight controversies in coronary artery disease understanding and management.
Submitted artcles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.