作为挤压混凝土3D打印质量控制工具的袖标和渗透计

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
M. Barry, Y. Jacquet, A. Perrot
{"title":"作为挤压混凝土3D打印质量控制工具的袖标和渗透计","authors":"M. Barry,&nbsp;Y. Jacquet,&nbsp;A. Perrot","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02831-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of 3D concrete printing has led to a broad array of digital construction processes, with extrusion-based techniques emerging as the most widespread. Despite significant advances, the lack of standardized procedures for quality control and structural design continues to impede broader industrial adoption. Effective quality control in 3D concrete printing requires that the rheological properties of fresh materials align with the demands of the printing process, thereby calling for rapid, field-deployable testing methods. Among recent developments, the slug test has shown promise by enabling estimation of the initial shear yield stress based on the mass of extruded slugs. However, this method provides limited insight into buildability, which depends on the time-dependent evolution of the material’s yield stress. To address this gap, pocket vane and penetration tests have been adapted for use in 3D printing contexts. Vane tests, when conducted with pocket devices, allow in situ tracking of the yield stress over time, while penetration tests—performed using either slow or fast protocols—offer valuable information on the material’s strength development. This paper presents a protocol that combines pocket vane and penetrometer testing to simultaneously evaluate shear yield stress and internal friction angle in printable mortars. The proposed approach is validated through experimental investigations on four different mortar formulations, demonstrating its relevance for practical quality control in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pocket vane and penetrometer as quality control tool for Extrusion 3D concrete printing\",\"authors\":\"M. Barry,&nbsp;Y. Jacquet,&nbsp;A. Perrot\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02831-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The development of 3D concrete printing has led to a broad array of digital construction processes, with extrusion-based techniques emerging as the most widespread. Despite significant advances, the lack of standardized procedures for quality control and structural design continues to impede broader industrial adoption. Effective quality control in 3D concrete printing requires that the rheological properties of fresh materials align with the demands of the printing process, thereby calling for rapid, field-deployable testing methods. Among recent developments, the slug test has shown promise by enabling estimation of the initial shear yield stress based on the mass of extruded slugs. However, this method provides limited insight into buildability, which depends on the time-dependent evolution of the material’s yield stress. To address this gap, pocket vane and penetration tests have been adapted for use in 3D printing contexts. Vane tests, when conducted with pocket devices, allow in situ tracking of the yield stress over time, while penetration tests—performed using either slow or fast protocols—offer valuable information on the material’s strength development. This paper presents a protocol that combines pocket vane and penetrometer testing to simultaneously evaluate shear yield stress and internal friction angle in printable mortars. The proposed approach is validated through experimental investigations on four different mortar formulations, demonstrating its relevance for practical quality control in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02831-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02831-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

3D混凝土打印的发展导致了一系列数字施工过程,其中基于挤压的技术最为普遍。尽管取得了重大进展,但缺乏质量控制和结构设计的标准化程序继续阻碍着更广泛的工业采用。在3D混凝土打印中,有效的质量控制要求新鲜材料的流变特性与打印过程的要求保持一致,因此需要快速的、可现场部署的测试方法。在最近的发展中,段塞测试通过基于挤压段塞的质量来估计初始剪切屈服应力,显示出了希望。然而,这种方法对可建造性的了解有限,这取决于材料屈服应力随时间的演变。为了解决这一差距,口袋叶片和穿透测试已经适应了3D打印环境。当使用口袋装置进行叶片测试时,可以随时间原地跟踪屈服应力,而渗透测试(使用慢速或快速协议进行)可提供有关材料强度发展的宝贵信息。本文提出了一种将口袋叶片和贯入仪相结合的方法来同时测定可打印砂浆的剪切屈服应力和内摩擦角。通过对四种不同砂浆配方的实验研究,验证了所提出的方法的有效性,证明了其与挤压型3D混凝土打印实际质量控制的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pocket vane and penetrometer as quality control tool for Extrusion 3D concrete printing

Pocket vane and penetrometer as quality control tool for Extrusion 3D concrete printing

The development of 3D concrete printing has led to a broad array of digital construction processes, with extrusion-based techniques emerging as the most widespread. Despite significant advances, the lack of standardized procedures for quality control and structural design continues to impede broader industrial adoption. Effective quality control in 3D concrete printing requires that the rheological properties of fresh materials align with the demands of the printing process, thereby calling for rapid, field-deployable testing methods. Among recent developments, the slug test has shown promise by enabling estimation of the initial shear yield stress based on the mass of extruded slugs. However, this method provides limited insight into buildability, which depends on the time-dependent evolution of the material’s yield stress. To address this gap, pocket vane and penetration tests have been adapted for use in 3D printing contexts. Vane tests, when conducted with pocket devices, allow in situ tracking of the yield stress over time, while penetration tests—performed using either slow or fast protocols—offer valuable information on the material’s strength development. This paper presents a protocol that combines pocket vane and penetrometer testing to simultaneously evaluate shear yield stress and internal friction angle in printable mortars. The proposed approach is validated through experimental investigations on four different mortar formulations, demonstrating its relevance for practical quality control in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信