授权化学专家与大语言模型的文献解释在单原子催化向高级氧化。

IF 16.9 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jing-Hang Wu,Ran Shi,Xiao Zhou,Liang Zhang,Kong Chen,Han-Qing Yu,Yuen Wu
{"title":"授权化学专家与大语言模型的文献解释在单原子催化向高级氧化。","authors":"Jing-Hang Wu,Ran Shi,Xiao Zhou,Liang Zhang,Kong Chen,Han-Qing Yu,Yuen Wu","doi":"10.1002/anie.202520525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large language models (LLMs) hold considerable promise for large-scale data extraction from scientific literatures for catalyst design and practical optimization. Yet, turning such outputs into reliable, formalized chemical knowledge would heavily rely on domain expertise rather than end-to-end automation. Herein, we present a human-in-the-loop workflow integrating LLM-facilitated structured data extraction with iterative, expert-guided curation and analysis. As a proof of concept, we take single-atom catalysts (SACs) for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) as an example, enabling efficient data extraction, rigorous curation, and statistically driven interpretation. Thus, we uncover the key correlations among metal types, coordination environments, reaction substances, and catalytic performance, providing deeper mechanism insights into SAC-driven AOPs. In contrast to fully automated, end-to-end models, our approach relies on human-driven optimization at multiple stages, and underscores human insight as central to understand LLM outputs. By introducing human-driven prompt refinement, model comparison, and expert-led analysis, our method ensures that human cognition remains central to interpreting LLM outputs and converting structured data into reliable scientific knowledge. Our work addresses the limitations inherent in fully automated, end-to-end methodologies and effectively bridges the gap between structured outputs and catalytically meaningful insights.","PeriodicalId":125,"journal":{"name":"Angewandte Chemie International Edition","volume":"138 1","pages":"e202520525"},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering Chemistry Experts with Large Language Models for Literature Interpretation in Single-Atom Catalysis Toward Advanced Oxidation.\",\"authors\":\"Jing-Hang Wu,Ran Shi,Xiao Zhou,Liang Zhang,Kong Chen,Han-Qing Yu,Yuen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/anie.202520525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large language models (LLMs) hold considerable promise for large-scale data extraction from scientific literatures for catalyst design and practical optimization. Yet, turning such outputs into reliable, formalized chemical knowledge would heavily rely on domain expertise rather than end-to-end automation. Herein, we present a human-in-the-loop workflow integrating LLM-facilitated structured data extraction with iterative, expert-guided curation and analysis. As a proof of concept, we take single-atom catalysts (SACs) for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) as an example, enabling efficient data extraction, rigorous curation, and statistically driven interpretation. Thus, we uncover the key correlations among metal types, coordination environments, reaction substances, and catalytic performance, providing deeper mechanism insights into SAC-driven AOPs. In contrast to fully automated, end-to-end models, our approach relies on human-driven optimization at multiple stages, and underscores human insight as central to understand LLM outputs. By introducing human-driven prompt refinement, model comparison, and expert-led analysis, our method ensures that human cognition remains central to interpreting LLM outputs and converting structured data into reliable scientific knowledge. Our work addresses the limitations inherent in fully automated, end-to-end methodologies and effectively bridges the gap between structured outputs and catalytically meaningful insights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angewandte Chemie International Edition\",\"volume\":\"138 1\",\"pages\":\"e202520525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angewandte Chemie International Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202520525\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angewandte Chemie International Edition","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202520525","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(llm)在从科学文献中提取用于催化剂设计和实际优化的大规模数据方面具有相当大的前景。然而,将这些输出转化为可靠的、形式化的化学知识将严重依赖于领域专业知识,而不是端到端的自动化。在这里,我们提出了一个人在循环的工作流程,将法学硕士促进的结构化数据提取与迭代、专家指导的管理和分析相结合。作为概念验证,我们以用于高级氧化过程(AOPs)的单原子催化剂(SACs)为例,实现了高效的数据提取、严格的管理和统计驱动的解释。因此,我们揭示了金属类型、配位环境、反应物质和催化性能之间的关键相关性,为sac驱动的AOPs提供了更深入的机制见解。与完全自动化的端到端模型相比,我们的方法依赖于人类在多个阶段驱动的优化,并强调人类的洞察力是理解法学硕士输出的核心。通过引入人类驱动的提示改进,模型比较和专家主导的分析,我们的方法确保人类认知仍然是解释法学硕士输出和将结构化数据转换为可靠的科学知识的核心。我们的工作解决了完全自动化、端到端方法固有的局限性,并有效地弥合了结构化产出与催化意义见解之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empowering Chemistry Experts with Large Language Models for Literature Interpretation in Single-Atom Catalysis Toward Advanced Oxidation.
Large language models (LLMs) hold considerable promise for large-scale data extraction from scientific literatures for catalyst design and practical optimization. Yet, turning such outputs into reliable, formalized chemical knowledge would heavily rely on domain expertise rather than end-to-end automation. Herein, we present a human-in-the-loop workflow integrating LLM-facilitated structured data extraction with iterative, expert-guided curation and analysis. As a proof of concept, we take single-atom catalysts (SACs) for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) as an example, enabling efficient data extraction, rigorous curation, and statistically driven interpretation. Thus, we uncover the key correlations among metal types, coordination environments, reaction substances, and catalytic performance, providing deeper mechanism insights into SAC-driven AOPs. In contrast to fully automated, end-to-end models, our approach relies on human-driven optimization at multiple stages, and underscores human insight as central to understand LLM outputs. By introducing human-driven prompt refinement, model comparison, and expert-led analysis, our method ensures that human cognition remains central to interpreting LLM outputs and converting structured data into reliable scientific knowledge. Our work addresses the limitations inherent in fully automated, end-to-end methodologies and effectively bridges the gap between structured outputs and catalytically meaningful insights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.60
自引率
6.60%
发文量
3549
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Angewandte Chemie, a journal of the German Chemical Society (GDCh), maintains a leading position among scholarly journals in general chemistry with an impressive Impact Factor of 16.6 (2022 Journal Citation Reports, Clarivate, 2023). Published weekly in a reader-friendly format, it features new articles almost every day. Established in 1887, Angewandte Chemie is a prominent chemistry journal, offering a dynamic blend of Review-type articles, Highlights, Communications, and Research Articles on a weekly basis, making it unique in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信