KRAS和NRAS突变在北欧人群和现实世界的转移性结直肠癌队列。

Emerik Osterlund, Ari Ristimäki, Luís Nunes, Soili Kytölä, Sonja Aho, Eetu Heervä, Aki Uutela, Kaisa Lehtomäki, Hanna Stedt, Päivi Halonen, Joel Kontiainen, Timo Muhonen, Raija Kallio, Jari Sundström, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Lasse Nieminen, Halfdan Sorbye, Per Pfeiffer, Tapio Salminen, Arno Nordin, Annamarja Lamminmäki, Markus J Mäkinen, Tobias Sjöblom, Helena Isoniemi, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Osterlund
{"title":"KRAS和NRAS突变在北欧人群和现实世界的转移性结直肠癌队列。","authors":"Emerik Osterlund, Ari Ristimäki, Luís Nunes, Soili Kytölä, Sonja Aho, Eetu Heervä, Aki Uutela, Kaisa Lehtomäki, Hanna Stedt, Päivi Halonen, Joel Kontiainen, Timo Muhonen, Raija Kallio, Jari Sundström, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Lasse Nieminen, Halfdan Sorbye, Per Pfeiffer, Tapio Salminen, Arno Nordin, Annamarja Lamminmäki, Markus J Mäkinen, Tobias Sjöblom, Helena Isoniemi, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Osterlund","doi":"10.1038/s44276-025-00188-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>KRAS and NRAS mutations (mt) are drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied frequencies, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of different KRASmt and NRASmt in population-based and real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three Nordic cohorts were combined and molecularly characterised for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E hotspot mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2649 mCRC patients, 2118 were molecularly classified. KRASmt were seen in 49%, NRASmt in 4%, RAS&BRAFwt in 33%, and BRAF-V600Emt in 14%. No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between KRASmt and NRASmt. Median overall survival (OS) was longest among RAS&BRAFwt, intermediate among KRASmt and NRASmt, and shortest among BRAF-V600Emt (28.3 vs 21.4 vs 26.3 vs 9.2 months, respectively). Among the eight most common KRASmt, the only clinical difference was that KRAS-G12S had more distant lymph node metastases (38% vs 18-27%, p = 0.041). KRAS-G12S had shorter OS than KRAS-G12V, KRAS-G12C, KRAS-G12A, and KRAS-G13D. The differences were smaller in treatment groups but withstood in multivariable models. The three most common NRASmt did not differ clinically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KRASmt and NRASmt are seen in 49% and 4% of mCRC, respectively. No clinically relevant differences were observed between different RASmt. KRASmt is a common subgroup for which the outcome hopefully can be improved with newly developed drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":519964,"journal":{"name":"BJC reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KRAS and NRAS mutations in Nordic population-based and real-world metastatic colorectal cancer cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Emerik Osterlund, Ari Ristimäki, Luís Nunes, Soili Kytölä, Sonja Aho, Eetu Heervä, Aki Uutela, Kaisa Lehtomäki, Hanna Stedt, Päivi Halonen, Joel Kontiainen, Timo Muhonen, Raija Kallio, Jari Sundström, Annika Ålgars, Raija Ristamäki, Lasse Nieminen, Halfdan Sorbye, Per Pfeiffer, Tapio Salminen, Arno Nordin, Annamarja Lamminmäki, Markus J Mäkinen, Tobias Sjöblom, Helena Isoniemi, Bengt Glimelius, Pia Osterlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44276-025-00188-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>KRAS and NRAS mutations (mt) are drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied frequencies, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of different KRASmt and NRASmt in population-based and real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three Nordic cohorts were combined and molecularly characterised for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E hotspot mutations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2649 mCRC patients, 2118 were molecularly classified. KRASmt were seen in 49%, NRASmt in 4%, RAS&BRAFwt in 33%, and BRAF-V600Emt in 14%. No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between KRASmt and NRASmt. Median overall survival (OS) was longest among RAS&BRAFwt, intermediate among KRASmt and NRASmt, and shortest among BRAF-V600Emt (28.3 vs 21.4 vs 26.3 vs 9.2 months, respectively). Among the eight most common KRASmt, the only clinical difference was that KRAS-G12S had more distant lymph node metastases (38% vs 18-27%, p = 0.041). KRAS-G12S had shorter OS than KRAS-G12V, KRAS-G12C, KRAS-G12A, and KRAS-G13D. The differences were smaller in treatment groups but withstood in multivariable models. The three most common NRASmt did not differ clinically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KRASmt and NRASmt are seen in 49% and 4% of mCRC, respectively. No clinically relevant differences were observed between different RASmt. KRASmt is a common subgroup for which the outcome hopefully can be improved with newly developed drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJC reports\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJC reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00188-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJC reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44276-025-00188-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:KRAS和NRAS突变(mt)是转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的驱动因素。我们研究了KRASmt和NRASmt在人群和现实世界中的频率、特征、治疗和结果。方法:结合三个北欧队列,对KRAS、NRAS和BRAF-V600E热点突变进行分子表征。结果:在2649例mCRC患者中,有2118例被分子分类。KRASmt占49%,NRASmt占4%,RAS&BRAFwt占33%,BRAF-V600Emt占14%。KRASmt和NRASmt的临床特征无差异。中位总生存期(OS) RAS&BRAFwt组最长,KRASmt和NRASmt组居中,BRAF-V600Emt组最短(分别为28.3个月、21.4个月、26.3个月和9.2个月)。在8种最常见的KRASmt中,唯一的临床差异是KRAS-G12S有更多的远处淋巴结转移(38% vs 18-27%, p = 0.041)。KRAS-G12S的生存期比KRAS-G12V、KRAS-G12C、KRAS-G12A和KRAS-G13D短。治疗组的差异较小,但在多变量模型中存在差异。三种最常见的NRASmt在临床上没有差异。结论:KRASmt和NRASmt分别占mCRC的49%和4%。不同RASmt间无临床相关差异。KRASmt是一种常见的亚组,其结果有望通过新开发的药物得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KRAS and NRAS mutations in Nordic population-based and real-world metastatic colorectal cancer cohorts.

Background: KRAS and NRAS mutations (mt) are drivers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied frequencies, characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of different KRASmt and NRASmt in population-based and real-world settings.

Methods: Three Nordic cohorts were combined and molecularly characterised for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF-V600E hotspot mutations.

Results: Of 2649 mCRC patients, 2118 were molecularly classified. KRASmt were seen in 49%, NRASmt in 4%, RAS&BRAFwt in 33%, and BRAF-V600Emt in 14%. No differences in clinical characteristics were observed between KRASmt and NRASmt. Median overall survival (OS) was longest among RAS&BRAFwt, intermediate among KRASmt and NRASmt, and shortest among BRAF-V600Emt (28.3 vs 21.4 vs 26.3 vs 9.2 months, respectively). Among the eight most common KRASmt, the only clinical difference was that KRAS-G12S had more distant lymph node metastases (38% vs 18-27%, p = 0.041). KRAS-G12S had shorter OS than KRAS-G12V, KRAS-G12C, KRAS-G12A, and KRAS-G13D. The differences were smaller in treatment groups but withstood in multivariable models. The three most common NRASmt did not differ clinically.

Conclusion: KRASmt and NRASmt are seen in 49% and 4% of mCRC, respectively. No clinically relevant differences were observed between different RASmt. KRASmt is a common subgroup for which the outcome hopefully can be improved with newly developed drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信