阻碍大肠杆菌固有耐药途径赋予抗生素致敏性和耐药性。

IF 7.2 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
PLoS Biology Pub Date : 2025-10-22 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003443
Manasvi Balachandran, Rohini Chatterjee, Ishaan Chaudhary, Chinmaya Jena, Nishad Matange
{"title":"阻碍大肠杆菌固有耐药途径赋予抗生素致敏性和耐药性。","authors":"Manasvi Balachandran, Rohini Chatterjee, Ishaan Chaudhary, Chinmaya Jena, Nishad Matange","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pathways of intrinsic resistance in bacteria are promising targets for novel antibiotics and resistance breakers. Here, we used a genome-wide screen to identify single gene knockouts of Escherichia coli that were hypersusceptible to trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, two chemically diverse broad-spectrum antibiotics. Among the hits from our screen, knockouts of acrB, an efflux pump, and rfaG or lpxM, both involved in cell envelope biogenesis, were hypersensitive to multiple antimicrobials and could sensitize genetically resistant E. coli strains to antibiotics. Using experimental evolution under trimethoprim pressure, we show that high drug selection regimes drove these knockouts to extinction more frequently than wild type. Among them, ΔacrB was most compromised in its ability to evolve resistance, establishing it as a promising target for \"resistance proofing.\" At a sub-inhibitory trimethoprim concentration, however, all three knockouts adapted to the antibiotic and consequently recovered from hypersensitivity, albeit to different extents. This recovery was driven by mutations in drug-specific resistance pathways, rather than compensatory evolution, frequently involving upregulation of the drug target. Notably, resistance-conferring mutations could by-pass defects in cell wall biosynthesis more effectively than efflux even though resistant mutations did not directly engage either pathway. Since inhibiting drug-efflux emerged as a better strategy, we tested the ability of chlorpromazine, an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), to resistance proof E. coli against trimethoprim. While qualitatively similar in the short term, genetic and pharmacological inhibition differed dramatically on an evolutionary time scale due to evolution of resistance to the EPI. Further, adaptation to the EPI-antibiotic pair also led to multidrug adaptation. The lack of concordance between genetic and pharmacological inhibition revealed a crucial lacuna in our understanding of the mutational repertoires that facilitate adaptation to antibiotics in bacteria. We propose that while intrinsic resistance mechanisms are effective targets for antibiotic sensitization, rapid evolutionary recovery may significantly limit their utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":"23 10","pages":"e3003443"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12543169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impeding pathways of intrinsic resistance in Escherichia coli confers antibiotic sensitization and resistance proofing.\",\"authors\":\"Manasvi Balachandran, Rohini Chatterjee, Ishaan Chaudhary, Chinmaya Jena, Nishad Matange\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pathways of intrinsic resistance in bacteria are promising targets for novel antibiotics and resistance breakers. Here, we used a genome-wide screen to identify single gene knockouts of Escherichia coli that were hypersusceptible to trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, two chemically diverse broad-spectrum antibiotics. Among the hits from our screen, knockouts of acrB, an efflux pump, and rfaG or lpxM, both involved in cell envelope biogenesis, were hypersensitive to multiple antimicrobials and could sensitize genetically resistant E. coli strains to antibiotics. Using experimental evolution under trimethoprim pressure, we show that high drug selection regimes drove these knockouts to extinction more frequently than wild type. Among them, ΔacrB was most compromised in its ability to evolve resistance, establishing it as a promising target for \\\"resistance proofing.\\\" At a sub-inhibitory trimethoprim concentration, however, all three knockouts adapted to the antibiotic and consequently recovered from hypersensitivity, albeit to different extents. This recovery was driven by mutations in drug-specific resistance pathways, rather than compensatory evolution, frequently involving upregulation of the drug target. Notably, resistance-conferring mutations could by-pass defects in cell wall biosynthesis more effectively than efflux even though resistant mutations did not directly engage either pathway. Since inhibiting drug-efflux emerged as a better strategy, we tested the ability of chlorpromazine, an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), to resistance proof E. coli against trimethoprim. While qualitatively similar in the short term, genetic and pharmacological inhibition differed dramatically on an evolutionary time scale due to evolution of resistance to the EPI. Further, adaptation to the EPI-antibiotic pair also led to multidrug adaptation. The lack of concordance between genetic and pharmacological inhibition revealed a crucial lacuna in our understanding of the mutational repertoires that facilitate adaptation to antibiotics in bacteria. We propose that while intrinsic resistance mechanisms are effective targets for antibiotic sensitization, rapid evolutionary recovery may significantly limit their utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"e3003443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12543169/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003443\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细菌的内在耐药途径是新型抗生素和耐药抑制剂的有希望的靶点。在这里,我们使用全基因组筛选来鉴定对甲氧苄啶和氯霉素(两种化学上不同的广谱抗生素)敏感的大肠杆菌的单基因敲除。在我们筛选的结果中,acrB、外排泵和rfaG或lpxM基因敲除都参与细胞包膜生物发生,对多种抗菌素过敏,并可能使基因耐药的大肠杆菌菌株对抗生素敏感。通过在甲氧苄氨嘧啶压力下的实验进化,我们发现高药物选择机制比野生型更频繁地导致这些基因敲除灭绝。其中,ΔacrB在其进化抗性的能力方面受到最大的损害,使其成为“抗性证明”的有希望的目标。然而,在亚抑制性甲氧苄氨嘧啶浓度下,所有三种基因敲除都适应了抗生素,并因此从过敏中恢复过来,尽管程度不同。这种恢复是由药物特异性耐药途径的突变驱动的,而不是代偿性进化,经常涉及药物靶点的上调。值得注意的是,即使抗性突变不直接参与任何途径,但赋予抗性的突变可以比外排更有效地绕过细胞壁生物合成中的缺陷。由于抑制药物外排是一种更好的策略,我们测试了氯丙嗪,一种外排泵抑制剂(EPI),对耐药大肠杆菌对甲氧苄啶的能力。虽然在短期内质量相似,但由于对EPI的抗性进化,遗传和药理学抑制在进化时间尺度上存在显着差异。此外,对epi -抗生素对的适应也导致了多药物适应。遗传和药理学抑制之间缺乏一致性揭示了我们对促进细菌适应抗生素的突变谱的理解中的一个关键空白。我们认为,虽然内在耐药机制是抗生素致敏的有效靶点,但快速的进化恢复可能会显著限制其效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impeding pathways of intrinsic resistance in Escherichia coli confers antibiotic sensitization and resistance proofing.

Pathways of intrinsic resistance in bacteria are promising targets for novel antibiotics and resistance breakers. Here, we used a genome-wide screen to identify single gene knockouts of Escherichia coli that were hypersusceptible to trimethoprim and chloramphenicol, two chemically diverse broad-spectrum antibiotics. Among the hits from our screen, knockouts of acrB, an efflux pump, and rfaG or lpxM, both involved in cell envelope biogenesis, were hypersensitive to multiple antimicrobials and could sensitize genetically resistant E. coli strains to antibiotics. Using experimental evolution under trimethoprim pressure, we show that high drug selection regimes drove these knockouts to extinction more frequently than wild type. Among them, ΔacrB was most compromised in its ability to evolve resistance, establishing it as a promising target for "resistance proofing." At a sub-inhibitory trimethoprim concentration, however, all three knockouts adapted to the antibiotic and consequently recovered from hypersensitivity, albeit to different extents. This recovery was driven by mutations in drug-specific resistance pathways, rather than compensatory evolution, frequently involving upregulation of the drug target. Notably, resistance-conferring mutations could by-pass defects in cell wall biosynthesis more effectively than efflux even though resistant mutations did not directly engage either pathway. Since inhibiting drug-efflux emerged as a better strategy, we tested the ability of chlorpromazine, an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), to resistance proof E. coli against trimethoprim. While qualitatively similar in the short term, genetic and pharmacological inhibition differed dramatically on an evolutionary time scale due to evolution of resistance to the EPI. Further, adaptation to the EPI-antibiotic pair also led to multidrug adaptation. The lack of concordance between genetic and pharmacological inhibition revealed a crucial lacuna in our understanding of the mutational repertoires that facilitate adaptation to antibiotics in bacteria. We propose that while intrinsic resistance mechanisms are effective targets for antibiotic sensitization, rapid evolutionary recovery may significantly limit their utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-BIOLOGY
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
359
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions. The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public. PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信